AB 1457: Public social services: merit or civil service employee.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2023-09-30
Current Status:
Passed
(2023-09-30: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 279, Statutes of 2023.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
This bill requires that when counties decide who qualifies for certain public benefits, those decisions must be made only by county merit or civil service employees (county workers hired under civil‑service rules, not political appointees or contractors). It adds the In‑Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), the Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), and Adult Protective Services (APS) to a list that already covers Medi‑Cal, CalWORKs, and CalFresh.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Existing law requires that any decisions governing eligibility for the Medi-Cal program, the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, or the CalFresh program that, in the state, are made by a county pursuant to provisions relating to public social services be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
Existing law generally requires the federal and state laws and regulations governing the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (or CalFresh in the state) to also govern the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP). Existing law requires the delivery of nutrition benefits under CFAP to be identical to the delivery of CalFresh benefits, to the extent permissible under federal law.
Existing law generally requires the federal and state laws and regulations governing the Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled (SSI/SSP) program to also govern the Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI).
Existing law sets forth various provisions relating to the implementation of the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program as a covered Medi-Cal benefit.
Existing law requires that the investigation of allegations of elder and dependent adult abuse under provisions relating to Adult Protective Services (APS), and the case management of elder and dependent adult abuse cases, be performed by county merit systems civil service employees.
This bill would add CFAP, CAPI, IHSS, and APS to the above-described list of programs for which any decisions governing eligibility that are made by a county would be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
Existing law requires that any decisions governing eligibility for the Medi-Cal program, the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, or the CalFresh program that, in the state, are made by a county pursuant to provisions relating to public social services be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
Existing law generally requires the federal and state laws and regulations governing the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (or CalFresh in the state) to also govern the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP). Existing law requires the delivery of nutrition benefits under CFAP to be identical to the delivery of CalFresh benefits, to the extent permissible under federal law.
Existing law generally requires the federal and state laws and regulations governing the Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled (SSI/SSP) program to also govern the Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI).
Existing law sets forth various provisions relating to the implementation of the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program as a covered Medi-Cal benefit.
Existing law requires that the investigation of allegations of elder and dependent adult abuse under provisions relating to Adult Protective Services (APS), and the case management of elder and dependent adult abuse cases, be performed by county merit systems civil service employees.
This bill would add CFAP, CAPI, IHSS, and APS to the above-described list of programs for which any decisions governing eligibility that are made by a county would be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
Existing law requires that any decisions governing eligibility for the Medi-Cal program, the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, or the CalFresh program that, in the state, are made by a county pursuant to provisions relating to public social services be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
Existing law generally requires the federal and state laws and regulations governing the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (or CalFresh in the state) to also govern the California Food Assistance Program (CFAP). Existing law requires the delivery of nutrition benefits under CFAP to be identical to the delivery of CalFresh benefits, to the extent permissible under federal law.
Existing law generally requires the federal and state laws and regulations governing the Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled (SSI/SSP) program to also govern the Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI).
Existing law sets forth various provisions relating to the implementation of the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program as a covered Medi-Cal benefit.
Existing law requires that the investigation of allegations of elder and dependent adult abuse under provisions relating to Adult Protective Services (APS), and the case management of elder and dependent adult abuse cases, be performed by county merit systems civil service employees.
This bill would add CFAP, CAPI, IHSS, and APS to the above-described list of programs for which any decisions governing eligibility that are made by a county would be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
Any decisions governing eligibility for any of the following programs that, in California, are made by a county pursuant to this division shall be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county:
(a)The Medi-Cal program, as described in Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000) of Part 3.
(b)The In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, as described in Article 7 (commencing with Section 12300) of Chapter 3 of Part 3.
(c)The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, as described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 11200) of Part 3.
(d)The CalFresh program, as described in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 18900) of Part 6.
(e)The California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), as described in Chapter 10.1 (commencing with Section 18930) of Part 6.
(f)The Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI) pursuant to Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 18937) of Part 6.
(g)The Adult Protective Services (APS) program, as described in Chapter 13 (commencing with Section 15750) of Part 3.
Any decisions governing eligibility for any of the following programs that, in California, are made by a county pursuant to this division shall be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county:
(a)The Medi-Cal program, as described in Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000) of Part 3.
(b)The In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, as described in Article 7 (commencing with Section 12300) of Chapter 3 of Part 3.
(c)The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, as described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 11200) of Part 3.
(d)The CalFresh program, as described in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 18900) of Part 6.
(e)The California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), as described in Chapter 10.1 (commencing with Section 18930) of Part 6.
(f)The Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI) pursuant to Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 18937) of Part 6.
(g)The Adult Protective Services (APS) program, as described in Chapter 13 (commencing with Section 15750) of Part 3.
Any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh any of the following programs that, in California, are made by a county pursuant to this division shall be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county. county:
(a)The Medi-Cal program, as described in Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000) of Part 3.
(b)The In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, as described in Article 7 (commencing with Section 12300) of Chapter 3 of Part 3.
(c)The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, as described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 11200) of Part 3.
(d)The CalFresh program, as described in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 18900) of Part 6.
(e)The California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), as described in Chapter 10.1 (commencing with Section 18930) of Part 6.
(f)The Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI) pursuant to Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 18937) of Part 6.
(g)The Adult Protective Services (APS) program, as described in Chapter 13 (commencing with Section 15750) of Part 3.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2023 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 279, Statutes of 2023. |
| Sep 30, 2023 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2353.). |
| Jun 21, 2023 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 19). |
| May 10, 2023 | Referred to Com. on HUMAN S. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1361.) |
| Apr 20, 2023 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 18). |
| Mar 9, 2023 | Referred to Com. on HUM. S. |
| Feb 18, 2023 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 20. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2023 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB1457 Ortega et al. By Skinner | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 19, 2023 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Human Services |
Passed |
|
| Apr 27, 2023 | AB 1457 Ortega Consent Calendar Second Day | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 18, 2023 | Do pass. To Consent Calendar. | Assembly Standing Committee on Human Services |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees | ** Support | |
| California Black Health Network | ** Support | |
| California Labor Federation, Afl-Cio | ** Support | |
| California Pan - Ethnic Health Network | ** Support | |
| California School Employees Association | ** Support | |
| California State Council of Service Employees International Union | ** Support | |
| Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organizations | ** Support | |
| County Welfare Directors Association of California | ** Support | |
| TechEquity Collaborative | ** Support | |
| Western Center On Law & Poverty | * Support | Jun 19, 2023 |
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 1457 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1457
Author: Ortega (D), et al.
Introduced: 2/17/23
Vote: 21
SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE: 4-0, 6/19/23
AYES: Alvarado-Gil, Hurtado, Menjivar, Wahab
NO VOTE RECORDED: Ochoa Bogh
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 4/27/23 (Consent) - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Public social services: merit or civil service employee
SOURCE: American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
California State Council of Service Employees International Union
DIGEST:
This bill adds the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), and the Adult Protective Services (APS) program to the social services programs requiring decisions governing eligibility to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the IHSS program to provide supportive services, including domestic, protective supervision, personal care, and paramedical services as specified, to individuals who are aged, blind, or living with disabilities, and who are unable to perform the services themselves or remain safely in their homes without receiving these services. (WIC 12300 et seq.)
- Establishes, under federal law, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known as CalFresh in California, to promote the general welfare and to safeguard the health and wellbeing of the nation’s population by raising the levels of nutrition among low-income households. (7 United States Code Section (U.S.C.) 2011 et seq.)
- Establishes the CalFresh program for the administration of federal SNAP benefits to eligible individuals. Provides program requirements and eligibility, as specified. (WIC 18900 et seq.)
- Establishes the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, which permits states to implement the program under a state plan. (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
- Establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits and, in part, which is governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq., WIC 14000 et seq.)
- Requires, in federal regulations, state agency personnel used in the SNAP certification process to be employed in accordance with the current standards for a merit system of personnel administration or any standards later prescribed by the U.S. Civil Service Commission, as specified, and further, stipulates that volunteers and other non-State agency employees shall not conduct certification interviews or certify SNAP applicants. (7 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) 272.4(a))
- Stipulates in federal regulations that a state Medicaid agency may delegate authority to make eligibility determinations or to conduct fair hearings, as specified, only to a government agency which maintains personnel standards on a merit basis. (42 C.F.R. 431.10(c)(2))
- Establishes, in state law, the CalWORKs Program, to provide cash assistance and other social services for low-income families through the federal TANF program. Under CalWORKs, each county provides assistance through a combination of state, county, and federal TANF funds. (WIC 11200 et seq.)
- Requires the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) to establish CFAP to provide assistance for persons who are not eligible for federal SNAP benefits due solely to their immigration status, as specified. (WIC 18930 et seq.)
- Defines “Adult Protective Services (APS)” to mean a county welfare department, except persons who do not work directly with elders or dependent adults as part of their official duties, including support staff and maintenance staff. (WIC 15610.13)
- Authorizes APS agencies and local long-term care ombudsman programs, within their jurisdiction and statutory authority, to investigate elder and dependent adult abuse and criminal neglect, and to assist local law enforcement agencies in criminal investigations at the law enforcement agencies’ request, if consistent with federal law, as specified. (PC 368.5(b)
- Provides that the civil service includes every officer and employee of the State except as otherwise provided in California State Constitution and requires that in the civil service permanent appointment and promotion are to be made under a general system based on merit ascertained by competitive examination. (California Constitution, Sec. 1, Res. Ch. 5)
- Requires any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh made by a California county to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county. (WIC 10503)
This bill adds the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), and the Adult Protective Services (APS) program to the social services programs in California that require decisions governing eligibility to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee.
Background
According to the author, “privatization of social services has been a national trend for many decades, exacerbated by the Trump Administration. We now see from study after study that privatization correlates with a decreasing approval rate of applicants and a worsening of services offered, quality of care, and protections for workers managing these essential programs, all in the name of cost savings to the State that never materializes. California made a great first step in 2018 by passing AB 3224 to prevent the State from contracting out with private companies to make eligibility decisions for CalFresh, CalWORKs, and Medi-Cal. AB 1457 will expand on this work to protect California’s low-income, foreign-born, and elderly communities by extending privatization protections for CAPI, CFAP, IHSS, and APS programs”.
Merit System and Civil Service. The state established civil service decades ago to ensure that the tax payer-funded hiring process ‒ including employee recruitment, selection, promotion, and retention ‒ is structured in a fair and impartial manner. State employees are part of the civil service under the California State Constitution. The merit system is the process of hiring and promoting based on their ability to perform the job, rather than on their political connections. The state also uses exams to measure a potential candidate's qualification for a particular title and a list of eligible candidates is established for each title ranked by their examination scores.
Efforts to Privatize Public Benefits. In 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture issued guidance inviting states to request a waiver to the long-standing regulation preventing privatized workers from determining eligibility for SNAP. Privatization is often thought of as a means to decrease costs for public services; however, reports by In the Public Interest, a national nonprofit research and policy organization, found that privatization “threatened the very goals and mission of many public good and services, especially those that the poor interact with the most”. The reports also notes that a disproportionate number of poor individuals and families face additional financial strain and hurt when food assistance programs like CalFresh are privatized.
Concerns have been raised in California that privatizing and contracting out eligibility determination for government administered programs would impact eligibility determination standards and the employment of existing civil service employees. In response to these concerns, AB 3224 (Thurmond, Chapter 179, Statutes of 2018) was enacted to require any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh be made exclusively by county merit or civil service employees. The provisions of this bill would expand this requirement to include IHSS CAPI, CFAP and the APS programs.
Cash Assistance Payments for Immigrants (CAPI). The federal Welfare Reform Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-193) prohibited non-citizen immigrants from receiving SSI/SSP benefits. As a result of these federal changes, only non-citizen immigrants who were receiving SSI/SSP in August 1996 are still eligible to receive SSI/SSP. California created CAPI to assist newly, ineligible immigrants by providing monthly cash benefits to aged, blind, and disabled non-citizens who were made ineligible for SSI/SSP due solely to their immigration status. The amount of CAPI benefits is equivalent to the amount of SSI/SSP benefits. CAPI is 100 percent state funded.
CAPI recipients may also be eligible for Medi-Cal, CalFresh and In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), but they must file for each benefit separately. There is no automatic eligibility link between CAPI and these other programs.
California Food Assistance Program (CFAP). Under federal law, CalFresh benefits are not available to undocumented immigrants. However, California provides state-funded food benefits through CFAP for a limited group of qualified non-citizens who are not eligible for federal benefits due to their immigration status. Like CalFresh, CFAP benefits are provided via EBT cards and can only be used to purchase food products authorized under CalFresh. Income and other eligibility requirements, as well as benefit amounts, for CFAP align with those for CalFresh. According to the Legislative Analyst Office, as of January 2022, CFAP provides food assistance to approximately 35,000 legal permanent residents each month and they receive an average food benefit amount of $131.
In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS). The IHSS program provides in-home services for qualified low-income Californians who are at least 65 years of age, blind or living with a disability with assistance in performing activities of daily living to enable them to live in their own homes. IHSS is administered at the state level by CDSS and at the local level by counties.
The program pays care providers to assist with personal care services (such as bathing, toileting, and grooming), domestic and related services (meal preparation, housecleaning, and the like), paramedical services, and protective supervision. IHSS services also may include accompaniment to medical appointments, protective supervision for recipients who have a mental impairment and may place themselves at risk of injury, hazard or accident and paramedical services, when directed by a physician. According to CDSS, about 619,163 Californians receive in-home care through IHSS, with 98.5 percent of whom received it as a Medicaid (or Medi-Cal in California) benefit.
Adult Protective Services (APS). APS provides voluntary alternatives and remedies to elder and dependent adults who are facing abuse from others or who are struggling to adequately take care of themselves. Services are provided without regard to the person requiring services. Since 1984, California has operated an APS program, which was later realigned to the counties in 2011. All counties within California are required under SB 2199 (Lockyer, Chapter 946, Statutes of 1998) to establish and maintain a system of protective services for elder and dependent adults who may be subjected to neglect, abuse, or exploitation, or who are unable to protect their own interest.
County APS agencies serve adults ages 60 years and older and dependent adults (ages 18-59 years with a disability), who are unable to meet their own needs, or are victims of abuse, neglect, or exploitation. County APS agencies investigate reports of known or suspected abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult, except for those that occur in or under the supervision of a state hospital, a state developmental center, or a long-term care facility including a community care facility, residential care facility for the elderly, and a long-term health care facility. They are also required to educate the public about the reporting requirements and responsibilities under the Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Reporting laws. Law enforcement, doctors, and other mandated reporters in the community rely on APS services to protect older and dependent adults from further abuse. In FY 2021-22, statewide APS received 215,998 reports and opened 162,253 cases.
This bill adds the IHSS, CAPI, CFAP and APS programs to the list of programs for which decisions regarding eligibility must be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of a county, consistent with how the state makes decisions for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, and CalFresh.
Related/Prior Legislation
AB 3224 (Thurmond, Chapter 179, Statutes of 2018) required any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh that are made by counties in California, to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
SUPPORT: (Verified 6/20/23)
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (co-source)
California State Council of Service Employees International Union (co-source)
California Black Health Network
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
California Pan - Ethnic Health Network
California School Employees Association
California State Council of Service Employees International Union
Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organizations
County Welfare Directors Association of California
Techequity Collaborative
OPPOSITION: (Verified 6/20/23)
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 4/27/23
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Connolly, Megan Dahle, Davies, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Mike Fong, Vince Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Holden, Hoover, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lackey, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Schiavo, Soria, Ta, Ting, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Jim Patterson
Prepared by: Bridgett Hankerson / HUMAN S. / (916) 651-1524
6/21/23 14:30:39
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
Senator Alvarado-Gil, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular
Bill No: | AB 1457 | ||
Author: | Ortega | ||
Version: | February 17, 2023 | Hearing Date: | June 19, 2023 |
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | No |
Consultant: | Bridgett Hankerson | ||
Subject: Public social services: merit or civil service employee
SUMMARY
This bill adds the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), and the Adult Protective Services (APS) program to the social services programs requiring decisions governing eligibility to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee.
ABSTRACT
Existing Law:
- Establishes the IHSS program to provide supportive services, including domestic, protective supervision, personal care, and paramedical services as specified, to individuals who are aged, blind, or living with disabilities, and who are unable to perform the services themselves or remain safely in their homes without receiving these services. (WIC 12300 et seq.)
- Establishes, under federal law, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known as CalFresh in California, to promote the general welfare and to safeguard the health and wellbeing of the nation’s population by raising the levels of nutrition among low-income households. (7 United States Code Section (U.S.C.) 2011 et seq.)
- Establishes the CalFresh program for the administration of federal SNAP benefits to eligible individuals. Provides program requirements and eligibility, as specified. (WIC 18900 et seq.)
- Establishes the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, which permits states to implement the program under a state plan. (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
- Establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits and, in part, which is governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq., WIC 14000 et seq.)
- Requires, in federal regulations, state agency personnel used in the SNAP certification process to be employed in accordance with the current standards for a merit system of personnel administration or any standards later prescribed by the U.S. Civil Service Commission, as specified, and further, stipulates that volunteers and other non-State agency employees shall not conduct certification interviews or certify SNAP applicants. (7 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) 272.4(a))
- Stipulates in federal regulations that a state Medicaid agency may delegate authority to make eligibility determinations or to conduct fair hearings, as specified, only to a government agency which maintains personnel standards on a merit basis. (42 C.F.R. 431.10(c)(2))
- Establishes, in state law, the CalWORKs Program, to provide cash assistance and other social services for low-income families through the federal TANF program. Under CalWORKs, each county provides assistance through a combination of state, county, and federal TANF funds. (WIC 11200 et seq.)
- Requires the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) to establish CFAP to provide assistance for persons who are not eligible for federal SNAP benefits due solely to their immigration status, as specified. (WIC 18930 et seq.)
- Defines “Adult Protective Services (APS)” to mean a county welfare department, except persons who do not work directly with elders or dependent adults as part of their official duties, including support staff and maintenance staff. (WIC 15610.13)
- Authorizes APS agencies and local long-term care ombudsman programs, within their jurisdiction and statutory authority, to investigate elder and dependent adult abuse and criminal neglect, and to assist local law enforcement agencies in criminal investigations at the law enforcement agencies’ request, if consistent with federal law, as specified. (PC 368.5(b)
- Provides that the civil service includes every officer and employee of the State except as otherwise provided in California State Constitution and requires that in the civil service permanent appointment and promotion are to be made under a general system based on merit ascertained by competitive examination. (California Constitution, Sec. 1, Res. Ch. 5)
- Requires any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh made by a California county to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county. (WIC 10503)
This Bill:
- Adds the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), and the Adult Protective Services (APS) program to the social services programs in California that require decisions governing eligibility to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee.
FISCAL IMPACT
This bill was not analyzed by a fiscal committee as this bill was keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Purpose of the Bill:
According to the author, “privatization of social services has been a national trend for many decades, exacerbated by the Trump Administration. We now see from study after study that privatization correlates with a decreasing approval rate of applicants and a worsening of services offered, quality of care, and protections for workers managing these essential programs, all in the name of cost savings to the State that never materializes. California made a great first step in 2018 by passing AB 3224 to prevent the State from contracting out with private companies to make eligibility decisions for CalFresh, CalWORKs, and Medi-Cal. AB 1457 will expand on this work to protect California’s low-income, foreign-born, and elderly communities by extending privatization protections for CAPI, CFAP, IHSS, and APS programs”.
Merit System and Civil Service
The state established civil service decades ago to ensure that the tax payer-funded hiring process ‒ including employee recruitment, selection, promotion, and retention ‒ is structured in a fair and impartial manner. State employees are part of the civil service under the California State Constitution. The merit system is the process of hiring and promoting based on their ability to perform the job, rather than on their political connections. The state also uses exams to measure a potential candidate's qualification for a particular title and a list of eligible candidates is established for each title ranked by their examination scores.
Efforts to Privatize Public Benefits
In 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture issued guidance inviting states to request a waiver to the long-standing regulation preventing privatized workers from determining eligibility for SNAP. Privatization is often thought of as a means to decrease costs for public services; however, reports by In the Public Interest, a national nonprofit research and policy organization, found that privatization “threatened the very goals and mission of many public good and services, especially those that the poor interact with the most”. The reports also notes that a disproportionate number of poor individuals and families face additional financial strain and hurt when food assistance programs like CalFresh are privatized.
Concerns have been raised in California that privatizing and contracting out eligibility determination for government administered programs would impact eligibility determination standards and the employment of existing civil service employees. In response to these concerns, AB 3224 (Thurmond, Chapter 179, Statutes of 2018) was enacted to require any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh be made exclusively by county merit or civil service employees. The provisions of this bill would expand this requirement to include IHSS CAPI, CFAP and the APS programs.
Cash Assistance Payments for Immigrants (CAPI)
The federal Welfare Reform Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-193) prohibited non-citizen immigrants from receiving SSI/SSP benefits. As a result of these federal changes, only non-citizen immigrants who were receiving SSI/SSP in August 1996 are still eligible to receive SSI/SSP. California created CAPI to assist newly, ineligible immigrants by providing monthly cash benefits to aged, blind, and disabled non-citizens who were made ineligible for SSI/SSP due solely to their immigration status. The amount of CAPI benefits is equivalent to the amount of SSI/SSP benefits. CAPI is 100 percent state funded.
CAPI recipients may also be eligible for Medi-Cal, CalFresh and In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), but they must file for each benefit separately. There is no automatic eligibility link between CAPI and these other programs.
California Food Assistance Program (CFAP)
Under federal law, CalFresh benefits are not available to undocumented immigrants. However, California provides state-funded food benefits through CFAP for a limited group of qualified non-citizens who are not eligible for federal benefits due to their immigration status. Like CalFresh, CFAP benefits are provided via EBT cards and can only be used to purchase food products authorized under CalFresh. Income and other eligibility requirements, as well as benefit amounts, for CFAP align with those for CalFresh. According to the Legislative Analyst Office, as of January 2022, CFAP provides food assistance to approximately 35,000 legal permanent residents each month and they receive an average food benefit amount of $131.
In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
The IHSS program provides in-home services for qualified low-income Californians who are at least 65 years of age, blind or living with a disability with assistance in performing activities of daily living to enable them to live in their own homes. IHSS is administered at the state level by CDSS and at the local level by counties.
The program pays care providers to assist with personal care services (such as bathing, toileting, and grooming), domestic and related services (meal preparation, housecleaning, and the like), paramedical services, and protective supervision. IHSS services also may include accompaniment to medical appointments, protective supervision for recipients who have a mental impairment and may place themselves at risk of injury, hazard or accident and paramedical services, when directed by a physician. According to CDSS, about 619,163 Californians receive in-home care through IHSS, with 98.5 percent of whom received it as a Medicaid (or Medi-Cal in California) benefit.
Adult Protective Services (APS)
APS provides voluntary alternatives and remedies to elder and dependent adults who are facing abuse from others or who are struggling to adequately take care of themselves. Services are provided without regard to the person requiring services. Since 1984, California has operated an APS program, which was later realigned to the counties in 2011. All counties within California are required under SB 2199 (Lockyer, Chapter 946, Statutes of 1998) to establish and maintain a system of protective services for elder and dependent adults who may be subjected to neglect, abuse, or exploitation, or who are unable to protect their own interest.
County APS agencies serve adults ages 60 years and older and dependent adults (ages 18-59 years with a disability), who are unable to meet their own needs, or are victims of abuse, neglect, or exploitation. County APS agencies investigate reports of known or suspected abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult, except for those that occur in or under the supervision of a state hospital, a state developmental center, or a long-term care facility including a community care facility, residential care facility for the elderly, and a long-term health care facility. They are also required to educate the public about the reporting requirements and responsibilities under the Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Reporting laws. Law enforcement, doctors, and other mandated reporters in the community rely on APS services to protect older and dependent adults from further abuse. In FY 2021-22, statewide APS received 215,998 reports and opened 162,253 cases.
This bill would add the IHSS, CAPI, CFAP and APS programs to the list of programs for which decisions regarding eligibility must be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of a county, consistent with how the state makes decisions for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, and CalFresh.
Related/Prior Legislation:
AB 3224 (Thurmond, Chapter 179, Statutes of 2018) required any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh that are made by counties in California, to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
COMMENTS
This bill seeks to expand the list of programs where the decisions governing eligibility that are made by counties within California to made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county and not by private entities. According to the sponsors of the bill, this would codify current practice within the state and protect programs from privatization by adding additional social services programs. Private companies often run on a model of maximizing profits and minimizing costs. This bill seeks to ensure that short term financial needs of private interests do not come at the expense of the long term outcomes of those served in the APS, CAPI, CFAP and IHSS programs. If passed, this bill would build on prior legislative efforts.
PRIOR VOTES
| |
Assembly Floor: | 79 - 0 |
Assembly Human Services Committee: | 7 - 0 |
POSITIONS
Support:
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (Co-Sponsor)
California State Council of Service Employees International Union (Co-Sponsor)
California Black Health Network
California Labor Federation, Afl-cio
California Pan - Ethnic Health Network
Oppose:
None received
-- END --
Date of Hearing: April 18, 2023
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
Corey A. Jackson, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1457 (
Author:Ortega) – As Introduced Ver:February 17, 2023
SUBJECT: Public social services: merit or civil service employee
SUMMARY: Adds the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), and Adult Protective Services (APS) program to the social services programs requiring decisions governing eligibility to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee.
EXISTING LAW:
- Requires any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh that, in California, are made by a county pursuant to this division to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county. (Welfare and Institutions Code Section [WIC] 10503)
- Establishes the IHSS program to provide supportive services, including domestic, protective supervision, personal care, and paramedical services as specified, to individuals who are aged, blind, or living with disabilities, and who are unable to perform the services themselves or remain safely in their homes without receiving these services. (WIC 12300 et seq.)
- Establishes under federal law the “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program” (SNAP) pursuant to the Food Stamp Act of 1964 and establishes, in California statute, the “CalFresh” program to administer the provision of federal SNAP benefits to families and individuals meeting certain criteria, as specified. (7 United States Code [U.S.C.] 2011 et seq., WIC 18900 et seq.)
- Establishes under federal law the “Temporary Assistance for Needy Families” (TANF) program to provide aid and welfare-to-work services to eligible families and, in California, provides that TANF funds for welfare-to-work services are administered through the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program. (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq., WIC 11200 et seq.)
- Establishes citizenship requirements for SNAP benefits, including that undocumented immigrants are ineligible for SNAP, as specified. (7 Code of Federal Regulations [C.F.R.] 273.4)
- Requires the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) to establish CFAP to provide assistance for persons who are not eligible for federal SNAP benefits due solely to their immigration status, as specified. (WIC 18930 et seq.)
- Provides that noncitizens of the United States (U.S.) shall be eligible for CFAP if the person’s immigration status meets the SNAP eligibility criteria in effect on August 21, 1996, but is not eligible for SNAP benefits solely due to their immigration status, as specified. (WIC 18930(b)(1))
- Requires, to the extent allowed by federal law, that the income, resources, and deductible expenses of those who receive CFAP benefits shall be excluded when calculating CalFresh benefits. (WIC 18930(d)(1))
- Provides that no household shall receive more CalFresh benefits than it would if no household member was rendered ineligible pursuant to federal law, as specified. (WIC 18930(d)(2))
- Declares that elders and dependent adults may be subjected to abuse, neglect, or abandonment and that the state has the responsibility to protect them. Further provides for uniform state guidelines, which specify when county adult protective service agencies are to investigate allegations of abuse of elders and dependent adults and the appropriate role of local law enforcement, in order to ensure that a minimum level of protection is provided to elders and dependent adults in each county. (WIC 15600(a) and (i))
- Defines “abuse of an elder or a dependent adult” to mean physical abuse, neglect, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or other treatment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering; the deprivation by a care custodian of goods or services that are necessary to avoid physical harm or mental suffering, or financial abuse, as defined. (WIC 15610.07(a); and Penal Code Section [PEN] 368.5(A)(i))
- Defines “adult protective services” to mean a county welfare department, except persons who do not work directly with elders or dependent adults as part of their official duties, including support staff and maintenance staff. (WIC 15610.13)
- Authorizes APS agencies and local long-term care ombudsman programs, within their jurisdiction and statutory authority, to investigate elder and dependent adult abuse and criminal neglect, and to assist local law enforcement agencies in criminal investigations at the law enforcement agencies’ request, if consistent with federal law, as specified. (PEN 368.5(b)
- Establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits and, in part, which is governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq., WIC 14000 et seq.)
- Requires, in federal regulations, state agency personnel used in the SNAP certification process to be employed in accordance with the current standards for a merit system of personnel administration or any standards later prescribed by the U.S. Civil Service Commission, as specified, and further, stipulates that volunteers and other non-State agency employees shall not conduct certification interviews or certify SNAP applicants. (7 C.F.R. 272.4(a))
- Stipulates in federal regulations that a state Medicaid agency may delegate authority to make eligibility determinations or to conduct fair hearings, as specified, only to a government agency which maintains personnel standards on a merit basis. (42 C.F.R. 431.10(c)(2))
FISCAL EFFECT: This bill was keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS:
Background: Federal guidance. The U.S. Department of Agriculture issued guidance in 2017 inviting states to request a waiver to the long-standing regulation preventing privatized workers from determining eligibility for SNAP. In response to concerns that privatizing and contracting out eligibility standards would not only threaten the jobs of existing civil service employees, but also impact the standards used for eligibility, legislation was introduced to prohibit this practice in California. AB 3224 (Thurmond), Chapter 179, Statutes of 2018, was enacted to require any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh that are made by counties in California, to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county. This bill simply expands this requirement to include more social service programs.
Research conducted by In the Public Interest, a national nonprofit research and policy organization, regarding attempts to privatize Medicaid in Kansas and Iowa, has indicated that privatization correlates with a decreasing approval rate of applicants and a worsening of services offered, quality of care, and protections for workers managing these essential programs. Additionally, cost savings to the state did not materialize. As the experiences seen in the privatization of Medicaid in Kansas and Iowa, not only were the fees charged by the private companies higher than what it had cost the government to manage the program, but the insurance companies requested additional government funding claiming they were functioning over budget. In fact, they had been cutting corners, and putting more pressure on fewer medical providers in order to make a profit on managing the Medicaid program.
Merit and civil service employees. Civil service, also known as the merit system, was created to assure that the recruitment and retention of a qualified work force, and, the selection and promotion of employees providing public services and compensated by tax dollars is conducted in a fair and impartial manner and in a competitive fashion. State employees are part of the civil service and the California State Constitution.
In Home Supportive Services. The IHSS program in California is available to eligible low-income individuals who need assistance with daily living tasks. To qualify for the state-established program, an individual must be at least 65 years old, living with a disability, or blind. IHSS providers are paid through the program to assist with personal care services (bathing, grooming, etc.), domestic and related services (food preparation, light housecleaning, etc.), protective supervision, and paramedical services. Recipients of IHSS are responsible for selecting, hiring, firing, directing, and supervising their provider—however, the state handles payroll. According to CDSS, at the end of January 2022, there were 569,710 IHSS providers throughout the state and 666,357 individuals enrolled in the program. Within the entire program, over 98% of recipients receive care as a Medicaid benefit. CDSS has oversight of the IHSS program, and the program is administered at the county level.
California Food Assistance Program. Due to the strict federal eligibility requirements that limit who can receive CalFresh benefits, California operates the state-funded CFAP, which provides food benefits to qualified non-citizens. In order to qualify for CFAP indefinitely, non-citizens must: currently be ineligible for CalFresh solely due to their immigration status; have been legally residing in the U.S. as a lawfully permanent resident prior to August 22, 1996; be battered or abused; and, be qualified non-citizens who are no longer federally eligible under the seven-year time limit. Additionally, a non-citizen can qualify for CFAP if they are otherwise eligible for the program but were sponsored into the U.S. on or after August 22, 1996, and: their sponsor has died or is disabled; or, the applicant, after entry into the U.S., is a victim of abuse by the sponsor or the spouse of the sponsor if the spouse is living with the sponsor. According to data from the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), CFAP serves approximately 35,000 legal permanent residents.
Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants. The 1998 Budget Act Implementation Bill for Social Services authorized the state-funded CAPI. The program was designed to provide cash assistance to certain aged, blind, and disabled immigrants who could no longer qualify for the Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Payment (SSI/SSP) Program. CAPI payment amounts vary depending on a person's marital status, living arrangements and other income and its payment standards are equivalent to the amount of SSI/SSP benefits. To qualify, recipients must meet the following:
- Meet all other SSI/SSP eligibility criteria except for immigration status.
- Be aged, blind, or disabled.
- Be a resident of California.
- Have resources below the allowable limits of $2,000 for an individual or $3,000 for a couple, and:
- Have income less than the CAPI standards.
- Be a non-citizen and meet the immigration status criteria in effect for SSI/SSP as of August 21, 1996.
- Be ineligible for SSI/SSP solely due to immigration status. This means a CAPI applicant must apply or SSI/SSP, or submit other proof of ineligibility from the Social Security Administration.
Adult Protective Services was established in 1984 and has agencies located in each of the 58 counties to assist adults 60 years of age and older, and dependent adults ages 18-59, who are disabled, when they are victims of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or unable to meet their own needs. When reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation are made, APS conducts an investigation and depending on the outcome, can provide services to keep them safe from harm. These services are provided without regard to income. In 1998, SB 2199 (Lockyer), Chapter 946, Statutes of 1998, was enacted to require each county to have a 24-hour emergency response system, to offer time-limited case management services that include advocacy, counseling and community services, as well as emergency shelter and in-home protection. The most common type of abuse reported is financial abuse, followed by psychological/emotional abuse, neglect and physical abuse. These made up almost 94% of the over 400,000 cases of abuse reported to APS between October 2019 to September 2022.
Author’s Statement: According to the Author, “Privatization of social services has been a national trend for many decades, exacerbated by the Trump Administration. We now see from study after study that privatization correlates with a decreasing approval rate of applicants and a worsening of services offered, quality of care, and protections for workers managing these essential programs, all in the name of cost savings to the State that never materialize. California made a great first step in 2018 by passing AB 3224 to prevent the State from contracting out with private companies to make eligibility decisions for CalFresh, CalWORKs, and Medi-Cal. [This bill] will expand on this work to protect California’s low-income, foreign-born, and elderly communities by extending privatization protections for CAPI, CFAP, IHSS, and APS programs.”
Need for this bill: The provisions of this bill seek to build on the existing prohibition to contracting out eligibility decisions for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh, by ensuring that eligibility decisions for other California safety net programs are not made by private companies who could place profit over meeting the needs of the state’s vulnerable clients. This bill would not impact the parameters of eligibility nor would it impact the provision of services, it would simply maintain the current practice of not contracting out eligibility decisions for social services programs. Despite this, the author and sponsor have reported that several counties are considering contracting eligibility workers to perform Medi-Cal eligibility redeterminations, which would be in contrast to existing law.
Equity Implications: This bill is attempting to prevent the disruption of services provided to those who qualify for CAPI, CFAP, IHSS, and APS, the majority of whom are low-income, foreign-born, and/or elderly and in need of the services provided by California’s safety net. According to data from the Public Policy Institute of California, California has done a better job than most other states in preventing large-scale privatization of social services. Nationally, California serves more families than other states do: in 2015, 65 out of 100 in poverty received cash assistance through CalWORKs, compared to the national average of 23 out of 100. By codifying current practice these programs that are proven to work well in pulling low-income families out of poverty through cash assistance provisions will be protected.
RELATED AND PRIOR LEGISLATION:
AB 3224 (Thurmond), Chapter 179, Statutes of 2018, required any decisions governing eligibility for Medi-Cal, CalWORKs, or CalFresh that are made by counties in California, to be made exclusively by a merit or civil service employee of the county.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
AFSCME, AFL-CIO (Co-Sponsor)
California State Council of Service Employees International Union (SEIU California) (Co-Sponsor)
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organizations
County Welfare Directors Association of California (CWDA)
TechEquity Collaborative
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Jessica Langtry / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089
Discussed in Hearing
View Older HearingsBill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):