AB 3218: Unflavored Tobacco List.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2024-09-28
Current Status:
Passed
(2024-09-28: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 849, Statutes of 2024.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than December 31, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, as specified, describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration has been sought and its status, if applicable, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style for the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions, and operating the list, as specified. The bill would create the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund for the collection of these fees, and would continuously appropriate these fees to the Attorney General for the purposes above, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
This bill would refine the definitions of characteristic flavor and tobacco product for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor or wholesaler from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would prohibit a delivery seller from selling a tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of these prohibitions.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. The bill would authorize the California Tax and Fee Administration or a law enforcement agency that discovers that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to seize those products, as specified. Under the bill, seized products would be delivered to the department within 30 days and deemed forfeited to the state. The bill would require the department to issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to $50 per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department, with increasing penalties for subsequent seizures. If a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns, or has made a sale of, a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, the bill would authorize the department to seize the tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer and would require the department to impose a civil penalty if the property is seized, as specified. If a distributor or other person has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, or a wholesaler has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer and the department or a local law enforcement agency has not seized the product, the bill would require the department to issue a warning for a first offense, suspend their license for a second offense, and revoke their license for a third offense.
Existing law, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, generally prohibits the retail sale of cigarettes in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale. Existing law authorizes the delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products if specified conditions are met.
This bill would refine the definition of cigarette for the purpose of these provisions, and would expand that prohibition to include the sale of tobacco products. The bill would require a delivery seller of cigarettes or tobacco products to comply with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location as if the delivery sale occurred entirely within the state and place.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by SB 1230 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1230 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than December 31, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, as specified, describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration has been sought and its status, if applicable, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style for the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions, and operating the list, as specified. The bill would create the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund for the collection of these fees, and would continuously appropriate these fees to the Attorney General for the purposes above, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
This bill would refine the definitions of characteristic flavor and tobacco product for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor or wholesaler from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would prohibit a delivery seller from selling a tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of these prohibitions.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. The bill would authorize the California Tax and Fee Administration or a law enforcement agency that discovers that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to seize those products, as specified. Under the bill, seized products would be delivered to the department within 30 days and deemed forfeited to the state. The bill would require the department to issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to $50 per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department, with increasing penalties for subsequent seizures. If a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns, or has made a sale of, a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, the bill would authorize the department to seize the tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer and would require the department to impose a civil penalty if the property is seized, as specified. If a distributor or other person has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, or a wholesaler has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer and the department or a local law enforcement agency has not seized the product, the bill would require the department to issue a warning for a first offense, suspend their license for a second offense, and revoke their license for a third offense.
Existing law, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, generally prohibits the retail sale of cigarettes in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale. Existing law authorizes the delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products if specified conditions are met.
This bill would refine the definition of cigarette for the purpose of these provisions, and would expand that prohibition to include the sale of tobacco products. The bill would require a delivery seller of cigarettes or tobacco products to comply with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location as if the delivery sale occurred entirely within the state and place.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by SB 1230 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1230 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified. A violation of this prohibition is an infraction.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than December 31, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, as specified, describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration has been sought and its status, if applicable, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to charge require a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style for the costs of incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions, and operating the list, as specified. The bill would create the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund for the collection of these fees, and would continuously appropriate these fees to the Attorney General for the purposes above, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
This bill would refine the definitions of characteristic flavor and tobacco product for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor or wholesaler from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would prohibit a delivery seller from selling a tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of these prohibitions.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the California Tax and Fee Administration or a law enforcement agency that discovers that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to seize those products, as specified. Under the bill, seized products would be delivered to the department within 30 days and deemed forfeited to the state. The bill would require the department to issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to $50 per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department, with increasing penalties for subsequent seizures. If a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns, or has made a sale of, a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, the bill would authorize the department to seize the tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer and would require the department to impose a civil penalty if the property is seized, as specified. If a distributor or other person has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, or a wholesaler has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer and the department or a local law enforcement agency has not seized the product, the bill would require the department to issue a warning for a first offense, suspend their license for a second offense, and revoke their license for a third offense.
Existing law, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, generally prohibits the retail sale of cigarettes in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale. Existing law authorizes the delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products if specified conditions are met.
This bill would refine the definition of cigarette for the purpose of these provisions, and would expand that prohibition to include the sale of tobacco products. The bill would require a delivery seller of cigarettes or tobacco products to comply with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location as if the delivery sale occurred entirely within the state and place.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by SB 1230 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1230 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified. A violation of this prohibition is an infraction.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than December 31, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, as specified, describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration has been sought and its status, if applicable, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to charge a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style for the costs of processing the submissions, and operating the list, as specified. The bill would create the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund for the collection of these fees, and would continuously appropriate these fees to the Attorney General for the purposes above, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
This bill would refine the definitions of characteristic flavor and tobacco product for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor or wholesaler from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would prohibit a delivery seller from selling a tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of this prohibition. these prohibitions.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
This bill would deem certain tobacco products possessed in violation of these provisions that are seized by the California Tax and Fee Administration to be forfeited to the state.This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the California Tax and Fee Administration or a law enforcement agency that discovers that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to seize those products, as specified. Under the bill, seized products would be delivered to the department within 30 days and deemed forfeited to the state. The bill would require the department to issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to $50 per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department, with increasing penalties for subsequent seizures. If a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns, or has made a sale of, a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, the bill would authorize the department to seize the tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer and would require the department to impose a civil penalty if the property is seized, as specified. If a distributor or other person has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, or a wholesaler has made a sale of a tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List or a tobacco product flavor enhancer and the department or a local law enforcement agency has not seized the product, the bill would require the department to issue a warning for a first offense, suspend their license for a second offense, and revoke their license for a third offense.
Existing law, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, generally prohibits the retail sale of cigarettes in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale. Existing law authorizes the delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products if specified conditions are met.
This bill would refine the definition of cigarette for the purpose of these provisions, and would expand that prohibition to include the sale of tobacco products. The bill would require a delivery seller of cigarettes or tobacco products to comply with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location as if the delivery sale occurred entirely within the state and place.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified. A violation of this prohibition is an infraction.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than December 31, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, as specified, describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration has been sought and its status, if applicable, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to charge a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style for the costs of processing the submissions, and operating the list, as specified. The bill would create the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund for the collection of these fees, and would continuously appropriate these fees to the Attorney General for the purposes above, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a product brand style in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
This bill would refine the definition definitions of characteristic flavor and tobacco product for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of this prohibition.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
This bill would deem certain tobacco products possessed in violation of these provisions that are seized by the California Tax and Fee Administration to be forfeited to the state.
This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified. A violation of this prohibition is an infraction.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than December 31, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, as specified, certify that each brand style is not adulterated or misbranded, as defined, describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration has been sought and its status, if applicable, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to charge a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style for the costs of processing the submissions, and operating the list, as specified. The bill would create the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund for the collection of these fees, and would continuously appropriate these fees to the Attorney General for the purposes above, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a product in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
TheThis bill would refine the definition of characteristic flavor for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of this prohibition.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
TheThis bill would deem certain tobacco products possessed in violation of these provisions that are seized by the California Tax and Fee Administration to be forfeited to the state.
This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified. A violation of this prohibition is an infraction.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than July 1, December 31, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style and state that it lacks a characterizing flavor and provide documentation demonstrating compliance with specified federal requirements. style, brand, and product category, as specified, certify that each brand style is not adulterated or misbranded, as defined, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a product in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
The bill would refine the definition of characteristic flavor for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of this prohibition.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
The bill would deem certain tobacco products possessed in violation of these provisions that are seized by the California Tax and Fee Administration to be forfeited to the state.
This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products, as defined, to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law, the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, provides for enforcement of that prohibition by the Attorney General.
Existing law prohibits a tobacco retailer, as defined, from offering for sale any flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified. A violation of this prohibition is an infraction.
This bill would require the Attorney General to, by no later than July 1, 2025, establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined.
This bill would require each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. The bill would require a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style and state that it lacks a characterizing flavor and provide documentation demonstrating compliance with specified federal requirements. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Attorney General to determine whether each brand style has a characterizing flavor, as specified. The bill would require any manufacturer or importer that submits a product in this way to, among other things, consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcing these provisions and to appoint an agent for service of process, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty up to $50,000 against any manufacturer or importer who falsely certifies that brand style determined to have a characteristic flavor, lacks a characteristic flavor.
The bill would refine the definition of characteristic flavor for purposes of the prohibition and these provisions.
This bill would prohibit a distributor from selling any tobacco product not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List to any person, as specified, for sale in the state and would authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified, for violations of this prohibition.
This bill would authorize the Attorney General to recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigative costs, and other related costs, against a nonprevailing party in a civil action brought pursuant to these provisions. The bill would require moneys recovered by the Attorney General in an action pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund, as specified.
The bill would deem certain tobacco products possessed in violation of these provisions that are seized by the California Tax and Fee Administration to be forfeited to the state.
This bill would also ban the retail sale of any tobacco product not on the Unflavored Tobacco List, as specified. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Section 22974.2 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22974.2.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers at the retail location or any other persons location.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers shall be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall issue the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized under Section 22974.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(5)For the purposes of paragraph (1), package means the individual packet, box, or other container of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers that are normally sold or intended to be sold at retail. Package does not include containers that contain smaller packaging units of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, including, but not limited to, cartons, cases, bales, or boxes.
SEC. 3.Section 22978.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22978.3.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, or has made a sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers possessed, stored, owned, or sold by the wholesaler.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers will be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers described in subdivision (a), the department shall impose a civil penalty upon the wholesaler equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall impose the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized in Section 22978.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(c)Upon discovery by the department that a distributor, wholesaler, or other person has made a sale in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and, for wholesalers, if neither the department nor a law enforcement agency seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers from the wholesaler pursuant to subdivision (a), all of the following shall apply:
(1)Upon a first offense, the department shall issue a warning notice to the distributor, wholesaler, or other person.
(2)Upon a second offense, the department shall suspend the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)Upon a third offense, the department shall revoke the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or other person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(d)The appeals procedures applicable to Section 22978.7 shall apply to the warning notice, suspension, and revocation actions taken by the department pursuant to this section.
SEC. 4.Section 22980 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22980.(a)A peace officer or department employee granted limited peace officer status pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 830.11 of the Penal Code, upon presenting appropriate credentials, is authorized to enter any place as described in paragraph (2) or (3) and to conduct inspections in accordance with all of the following:
(1)Inspections shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
(2)Inspections may be at any place at which cigarettes or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored or at any site where evidence of activities involving evasion of cigarette or tobacco products tax and violations of Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code may be discovered.
(3)Inspections may be at any place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.1 or 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(4)Inspections shall be requested or conducted no more than once in a 24-hour period.
(b)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection shall be subject to the penalties imposed pursuant to Section 22981.
SEC. 5.Section 22990 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22990.(a)All moneys collected pursuant to this division shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. No moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund shall be used to supplant state or local General Fund money for any purpose.
(b)All moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund are available for expenditure, upon appropriation by the Legislature, solely for the purpose of implementing, enforcing, and administering the California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, including the seizure and destruction of cigarettes and tobacco products.
SEC. 6.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)(1)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
(A)Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B)Describes, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 301 et seq.) has been sought and, if so, the status of any request for that authorization, approval, or order.
(C)Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(2)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand styles lack of characterizing flavor.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(3)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and documentation regarding tobacco product status, packaging, or marketing of a brand style.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph and designated as nonpublic shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(f)(1)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(2)(A)The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination.
(B)Removal of a brand style from the UTL will be effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C)A manufacturer or importer may provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in paragraph (1) within 30 days of the notice provided pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(D)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import.
(k)(1)Every manufacturer and importer submission under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) shall be accompanied by an initial application fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. The Attorney General shall collect an annual renewal fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of maintaining the UTL, to offset the costs associated with operating the UTL. The fee shall be for the fiscal year ending June 30 and shall not be prorated.
(2)Application and renewal fees received under this subdivision shall be deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of processing the submissions and operating the UTL.
(l)(1)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2)A manufacturer or importer may challenge a decision by the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1) in addition to providing additional materials to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision (f).
(m)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
(n)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(o)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), a distributor or wholesaler shall not sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. A delivery seller shall not sell a tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California.
(2)This subdivision does not apply to the sale of tobacco products by a distributor or wholesaler to a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, or any other person that the state, pursuant to the United States Constitution, the laws of the United States, or the California Constitution, is prohibited from regulating.
(3)For each tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor, wholesaler, or delivery seller according to the following schedule:
(A)A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(B)A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation within a five-year period.
(C)A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(D)A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(E)A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(p)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(q)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations, requiring reporting of delivery sales of tobacco products and constitutionally exempted distributions of flavored tobacco products, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(r)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(s)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104559.5, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)Tobacco product flavor enhancer has the same meaning as defined in Section 104559.5.
(5)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(t)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 7.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 7.5.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 8.Section 30101.7 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30101.7.(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to facilitate the collection of all applicable state surtaxes, sales or use taxes, and escrow and other payment obligations on cigarettes sold to residents of the state and to ensure compliance with the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 (PACT Act; Public Law 111-154).
(b)Except as provided in subdivision (d), no person may engage in a retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale.
(c)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1)Cigarette has the same meaning as provided in Section 375 of Title 15 of the United States Code, as amended from time to time.
(2)Consumer means a person who purchases cigarettes or tobacco products. Consumer does not include any person licensed under this part or under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code and lawfully operating as a manufacturer, distributor, wholesaler, or retailer of cigarettes or tobacco products.
(3)Delivery sale means sale of cigarettes or tobacco products into and in this state in either of the following cases:
(A)The consumer submits the order for the sale by means of a telephone or other method of voice transmission, the mail, or the Internet or other online service, or the seller is otherwise not in the physical presence of the consumer when the request for purchase or order is made.
(B)The cigarettes or tobacco products are delivered to the consumer by common carrier, private delivery service, or other method of remote delivery, or the seller is not in the physical presence of the consumer when the consumer obtains possession of the cigarettes or tobacco products.
(4)Delivery seller means a person who makes a delivery sale.
(5)Face-to-face sale means a sale in which the purchaser is in the physical presence of the seller or the sellers employee or agent at the time of the sale. A face-to-face sale does not include a delivery sale.
(6)Indian country shall have the same meaning as provided in Section 1151 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and includes any other land held by the United States in trust or restricted status for one or more Indian tribes.
(7)Interstate commerce means commerce between a state and any place outside the state, commerce between a state and Indian country in the state, or commerce between points in the same state but through a place outside of the state or through any Indian country.
(8)Tobacco products shall have the same meaning as otherwise defined under this part with the exception of cigars.
(d)A person may engage in delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products to a person in California provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The delivery seller has fully complied with all of the requirements of Chapter 10A (commencing with Section 375) of Title 15 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Jenkins Act.
(2)The delivery seller obtains and maintains any applicable license under this part and under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within this state.
(3)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law that imposes escrow or other payment obligations on tobacco product manufacturers, including, but not limited to, Sections 104555 to 104557, inclusive, of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location, including Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within the state and place.
(5)The Attorney General may require the delivery seller to report to the Attorney General its delivery sales of cigarettes and tobacco products to California consumers in the form and manner specified by the Attorney General.
(e)Any violation of this section by any person is a misdemeanor. Each offense shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), or imprisonment not to exceed one year in a county jail, or both the fine and imprisonment. The amount of any fines assessed shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund.
(f)The State Board of Equalization may provide information relative to a sellers failure or attempt to comply with the PACT Act and the Jenkins Act to the Attorney General.
(g)The Attorney General or a city attorney, county counsel, or district attorney may bring a civil action to enforce this section against a person that violates this section and, in addition to any other remedy provided by law, the court shall assess a civil penalty in accordance with the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) and not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation within a five-year period.
(3)A civil penalty of not less than four thousand dollars ($4,000) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not less than five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500) and not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for a fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(h)This section does not prohibit the lawful sale of a tobacco product that occurs by means of a vending machine.
(i)Nothing in this section shall relieve the seller of cigarettes from any other applicable requirement of state law relating to the sale or distribution of cigarettes or tobacco products in this state.
(j)The board shall enforce the licensing and tax provisions of this section. Other provisions of this section shall be enforced by the Attorney General.
(k)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 9.The Legislature finds and declares that Section 6 of this act, which adds Section 104559.1 to the Health and Safety Code, imposes a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the Attorney General, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
SEC. 10.Section 7.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1230. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1230, in which case Section 7 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 11.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Section 22974.2 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22974.2.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers at the retail location or any other persons location.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers shall be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall issue the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized under Section 22974.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(5)For the purposes of paragraph (1), package means the individual packet, box, or other container of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers that are normally sold or intended to be sold at retail. Package does not include containers that contain smaller packaging units of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, including, but not limited to, cartons, cases, bales, or boxes.
SEC. 3.Section 22978.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22978.3.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, or has made a sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers possessed, stored, owned, or sold by the wholesaler.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers will be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers described in subdivision (a), the department shall impose a civil penalty upon the wholesaler equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall impose the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized in Section 22978.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(c)Upon discovery by the department that a distributor, wholesaler, or other person has made a sale in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and, for wholesalers, if neither the department nor a law enforcement agency seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers from the wholesaler pursuant to subdivision (a), all of the following shall apply:
(1)Upon a first offense, the department shall issue a warning notice to the distributor, wholesaler, or other person.
(2)Upon a second offense, the department shall suspend the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)Upon a third offense, the department shall revoke the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or other person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(d)The appeals procedures applicable to Section 22978.7 shall apply to the warning notice, suspension, and revocation actions taken by the department pursuant to this section.
SEC. 4.Section 22980 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22980.(a)A peace officer or department employee granted limited peace officer status pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 830.11 of the Penal Code, upon presenting appropriate credentials, is authorized to enter any place as described in paragraph (2) or (3) and to conduct inspections in accordance with all of the following:
(1)Inspections shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
(2)Inspections may be at any place at which cigarettes or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored or at any site where evidence of activities involving evasion of cigarette or tobacco products tax and violations of Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code may be discovered.
(3)Inspections may be at any place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.1 or 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(4)Inspections shall be requested or conducted no more than once in a 24-hour period.
(b)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection shall be subject to the penalties imposed pursuant to Section 22981.
SEC. 5.Section 22990 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22990.(a)All moneys collected pursuant to this division shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. No moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund shall be used to supplant state or local General Fund money for any purpose.
(b)All moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund are available for expenditure, upon appropriation by the Legislature, solely for the purpose of implementing, enforcing, and administering the California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, including the seizure and destruction of cigarettes and tobacco products.
SEC. 6.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)(1)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
(A)Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B)Describes, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 301 et seq.) has been sought and, if so, the status of any request for that authorization, approval, or order.
(C)Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(2)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand styles lack of characterizing flavor.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(3)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and documentation regarding tobacco product status, packaging, or marketing of a brand style.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph and designated as nonpublic shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(f)(1)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(2)(A)The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination.
(B)Removal of a brand style from the UTL will be effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C)A manufacturer or importer may provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in paragraph (1) within 30 days of the notice provided pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(D)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import.
(k)(1)Every manufacturer and importer submission under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) shall be accompanied by an initial application fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. The Attorney General shall collect an annual renewal fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of maintaining the UTL, to offset the costs associated with operating the UTL. The fee shall be for the fiscal year ending June 30 and shall not be prorated.
(2)Application and renewal fees received under this subdivision shall be deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of processing the submissions and operating the UTL.
(l)(1)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2)A manufacturer or importer may challenge a decision by the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1) in addition to providing additional materials to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision (f).
(m)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
(n)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(o)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), a distributor or wholesaler shall not sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. A delivery seller shall not sell a tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California.
(2)This subdivision does not apply to the sale of tobacco products by a distributor or wholesaler to a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, or any other person that the state, pursuant to the United States Constitution, the laws of the United States, or the California Constitution, is prohibited from regulating.
(3)For each tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor, wholesaler, or delivery seller according to the following schedule:
(A)A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(B)A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation within a five-year period.
(C)A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(D)A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(E)A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(p)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(q)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations, requiring reporting of delivery sales of tobacco products and constitutionally exempted distributions of flavored tobacco products, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(r)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(s)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104559.5, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)Tobacco product flavor enhancer has the same meaning as defined in Section 104559.5.
(5)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(t)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 7.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 7.5.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 8.Section 30101.7 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30101.7.(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to facilitate the collection of all applicable state surtaxes, sales or use taxes, and escrow and other payment obligations on cigarettes sold to residents of the state and to ensure compliance with the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 (PACT Act; Public Law 111-154).
(b)Except as provided in subdivision (d), no person may engage in a retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale.
(c)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1)Cigarette has the same meaning as provided in Section 375 of Title 15 of the United States Code, as amended from time to time.
(2)Consumer means a person who purchases cigarettes or tobacco products. Consumer does not include any person licensed under this part or under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code and lawfully operating as a manufacturer, distributor, wholesaler, or retailer of cigarettes or tobacco products.
(3)Delivery sale means sale of cigarettes or tobacco products into and in this state in either of the following cases:
(A)The consumer submits the order for the sale by means of a telephone or other method of voice transmission, the mail, or the Internet or other online service, or the seller is otherwise not in the physical presence of the consumer when the request for purchase or order is made.
(B)The cigarettes or tobacco products are delivered to the consumer by common carrier, private delivery service, or other method of remote delivery, or the seller is not in the physical presence of the consumer when the consumer obtains possession of the cigarettes or tobacco products.
(4)Delivery seller means a person who makes a delivery sale.
(5)Face-to-face sale means a sale in which the purchaser is in the physical presence of the seller or the sellers employee or agent at the time of the sale. A face-to-face sale does not include a delivery sale.
(6)Indian country shall have the same meaning as provided in Section 1151 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and includes any other land held by the United States in trust or restricted status for one or more Indian tribes.
(7)Interstate commerce means commerce between a state and any place outside the state, commerce between a state and Indian country in the state, or commerce between points in the same state but through a place outside of the state or through any Indian country.
(8)Tobacco products shall have the same meaning as otherwise defined under this part with the exception of cigars.
(d)A person may engage in delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products to a person in California provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The delivery seller has fully complied with all of the requirements of Chapter 10A (commencing with Section 375) of Title 15 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Jenkins Act.
(2)The delivery seller obtains and maintains any applicable license under this part and under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within this state.
(3)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law that imposes escrow or other payment obligations on tobacco product manufacturers, including, but not limited to, Sections 104555 to 104557, inclusive, of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location, including Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within the state and place.
(5)The Attorney General may require the delivery seller to report to the Attorney General its delivery sales of cigarettes and tobacco products to California consumers in the form and manner specified by the Attorney General.
(e)Any violation of this section by any person is a misdemeanor. Each offense shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), or imprisonment not to exceed one year in a county jail, or both the fine and imprisonment. The amount of any fines assessed shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund.
(f)The State Board of Equalization may provide information relative to a sellers failure or attempt to comply with the PACT Act and the Jenkins Act to the Attorney General.
(g)The Attorney General or a city attorney, county counsel, or district attorney may bring a civil action to enforce this section against a person that violates this section and, in addition to any other remedy provided by law, the court shall assess a civil penalty in accordance with the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) and not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation within a five-year period.
(3)A civil penalty of not less than four thousand dollars ($4,000) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not less than five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500) and not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for a fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(h)This section does not prohibit the lawful sale of a tobacco product that occurs by means of a vending machine.
(i)Nothing in this section shall relieve the seller of cigarettes from any other applicable requirement of state law relating to the sale or distribution of cigarettes or tobacco products in this state.
(j)The board shall enforce the licensing and tax provisions of this section. Other provisions of this section shall be enforced by the Attorney General.
(k)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 9.The Legislature finds and declares that Section 6 of this act, which adds Section 104559.1 to the Health and Safety Code, imposes a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the Attorney General, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
SEC. 10.Section 7.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1230. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1230, in which case Section 7 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 11.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Section 22974.2 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22974.2.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers at the retail location or any other persons location.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers shall be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall issue the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized under Section 22974.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(5)For the purposes of paragraph (1), package means the individual packet, box, or other container of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers that are normally sold or intended to be sold at retail. Package does not include containers that contain smaller packaging units of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, including, but not limited to, cartons, cases, bales, or boxes.
SEC. 3.Section 22978.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22978.3.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, or has made a sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers possessed, stored, owned, or sold by the wholesaler.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers will be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers described in subdivision (a), the department shall impose a civil penalty upon the wholesaler equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall impose the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized in Section 22978.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(c)Upon discovery by the department that a distributor, wholesaler, or other person has made a sale in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and, for wholesalers, if neither the department nor a law enforcement agency seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers from the wholesaler pursuant to subdivision (a), all of the following shall apply:
(1)Upon a first offense, the department shall issue a warning notice to the distributor, wholesaler, or other person.
(2)Upon a second offense, the department shall suspend the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)Upon a third offense, the department shall revoke the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or other person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(d)The appeals procedures applicable to Section 22978.7 shall apply to the warning notice, suspension, and revocation actions taken by the department pursuant to this section.
SEC. 4.Section 22980 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22980.(a)A peace officer or department employee granted limited peace officer status pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 830.11 of the Penal Code, upon presenting appropriate credentials, is authorized to enter any place as described in paragraph (2) or (3) and to conduct inspections in accordance with all of the following:
(1)Inspections shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
(2)Inspections may be at any place at which cigarettes or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored or at any site where evidence of activities involving evasion of cigarette or tobacco products tax and violations of Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code may be discovered.
(3)Inspections may be at any place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.1 or 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(4)Inspections shall be requested or conducted no more than once in a 24-hour period.
(b)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection shall be subject to the penalties imposed pursuant to Section 22981.
SEC. 5.Section 22990 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22990.(a)All moneys collected pursuant to this division shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. No moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund shall be used to supplant state or local General Fund money for any purpose.
(b)All moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund are available for expenditure, upon appropriation by the Legislature, solely for the purpose of implementing, enforcing, and administering the California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, including the seizure and destruction of cigarettes and tobacco products.
SEC. 6.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)(1)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
(A)Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B)Describes, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 301 et seq.) has been sought and, if so, the status of any request for that authorization, approval, or order.
(C)Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(2)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand styles lack of characterizing flavor.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(3)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and documentation regarding tobacco product status, packaging, or marketing of a brand style.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph and designated as nonpublic shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(f)(1)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(2)(A)The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination.
(B)Removal of a brand style from the UTL will be effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C)A manufacturer or importer may provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in paragraph (1) within 30 days of the notice provided pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(D)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import.
(k)(1)Every manufacturer and importer submission under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) shall be accompanied by an initial application fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. The Attorney General shall collect an annual renewal fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of maintaining the UTL, to offset the costs associated with operating the UTL. The fee shall be for the fiscal year ending June 30 and shall not be prorated.
(2)Application and renewal fees received under this subdivision shall be deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of processing the submissions and operating the UTL.
(l)(1)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2)A manufacturer or importer may challenge a decision by the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1) in addition to providing additional materials to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision (f).
(m)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
(n)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(o)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), a distributor or wholesaler shall not sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. A delivery seller shall not sell a tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California.
(2)This subdivision does not apply to the sale of tobacco products by a distributor or wholesaler to a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, or any other person that the state, pursuant to the United States Constitution, the laws of the United States, or the California Constitution, is prohibited from regulating.
(3)For each tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor, wholesaler, or delivery seller according to the following schedule:
(A)A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(B)A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation within a five-year period.
(C)A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(D)A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(E)A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(p)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(q)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations, requiring reporting of delivery sales of tobacco products and constitutionally exempted distributions of flavored tobacco products, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(r)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(s)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104559.5, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)Tobacco product flavor enhancer has the same meaning as defined in Section 104559.5.
(5)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(t)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 7.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 7.5.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product. Characterizing flavors include, but are odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or aromas odors relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. A tobacco product shall not be determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings or the provision of ingredient information. Rather, it is the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, as described in the first sentence of this definition, that constitutes a characterizing flavor. spice, or a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Loose leaf Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(11)(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(12)(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(13)(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(14)(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(15)(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(16)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in paragraph (8) of subdivision (a) of Section 104495, as that provision may be amended from time to time.(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(17)(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(18)(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to loose leaf looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 8.Section 30101.7 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30101.7.(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to facilitate the collection of all applicable state surtaxes, sales or use taxes, and escrow and other payment obligations on cigarettes sold to residents of the state and to ensure compliance with the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 (PACT Act; Public Law 111-154).
(b)Except as provided in subdivision (d), no person may engage in a retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale.
(c)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1)Cigarette has the same meaning as provided in Section 375 of Title 15 of the United States Code, as amended from time to time.
(2)Consumer means a person who purchases cigarettes or tobacco products. Consumer does not include any person licensed under this part or under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code and lawfully operating as a manufacturer, distributor, wholesaler, or retailer of cigarettes or tobacco products.
(3)Delivery sale means sale of cigarettes or tobacco products into and in this state in either of the following cases:
(A)The consumer submits the order for the sale by means of a telephone or other method of voice transmission, the mail, or the Internet or other online service, or the seller is otherwise not in the physical presence of the consumer when the request for purchase or order is made.
(B)The cigarettes or tobacco products are delivered to the consumer by common carrier, private delivery service, or other method of remote delivery, or the seller is not in the physical presence of the consumer when the consumer obtains possession of the cigarettes or tobacco products.
(4)Delivery seller means a person who makes a delivery sale.
(5)Face-to-face sale means a sale in which the purchaser is in the physical presence of the seller or the sellers employee or agent at the time of the sale. A face-to-face sale does not include a delivery sale.
(6)Indian country shall have the same meaning as provided in Section 1151 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and includes any other land held by the United States in trust or restricted status for one or more Indian tribes.
(7)Interstate commerce means commerce between a state and any place outside the state, commerce between a state and Indian country in the state, or commerce between points in the same state but through a place outside of the state or through any Indian country.
(8)Tobacco products shall have the same meaning as otherwise defined under this part with the exception of cigars.
(d)A person may engage in delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products to a person in California provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The delivery seller has fully complied with all of the requirements of Chapter 10A (commencing with Section 375) of Title 15 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Jenkins Act.
(2)The delivery seller obtains and maintains any applicable license under this part and under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within this state.
(3)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law that imposes escrow or other payment obligations on tobacco product manufacturers, including, but not limited to, Sections 104555 to 104557, inclusive, of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location, including Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within the state and place.
(5)The Attorney General may require the delivery seller to report to the Attorney General its delivery sales of cigarettes and tobacco products to California consumers in the form and manner specified by the Attorney General.
(e)Any violation of this section by any person is a misdemeanor. Each offense shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), or imprisonment not to exceed one year in a county jail, or both the fine and imprisonment. The amount of any fines assessed shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund.
(f)The State Board of Equalization may provide information relative to a sellers failure or attempt to comply with the PACT Act and the Jenkins Act to the Attorney General.
(g)The Attorney General or a city attorney, county counsel, or district attorney may bring a civil action to enforce this section against a person that violates this section and, in addition to any other remedy provided by law, the court shall assess a civil penalty in accordance with the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) and not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation within a five-year period.
(3)A civil penalty of not less than four thousand dollars ($4,000) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not less than five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500) and not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for a fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(h)This section does not prohibit the lawful sale of a tobacco product that occurs by means of a vending machine.
(i)Nothing in this section shall relieve the seller of cigarettes from any other applicable requirement of state law relating to the sale or distribution of cigarettes or tobacco products in this state.
(j)The board shall enforce the licensing and tax provisions of this section. Other provisions of this section shall be enforced by the Attorney General.
(k)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 9.The Legislature finds and declares that Section 6 of this act, which adds Section 104559.1 to the Health and Safety Code, imposes a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the Attorney General, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
SEC. 10.Section 7.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1230. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1230, in which case Section 7 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 10.SEC. 11.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Section 22974.2 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22974.2.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers at the retail location or any other persons location.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers shall be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall issue the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized under Section 22974.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers under subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the retailer, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(5)For the purposes of paragraph (1), package means the individual packet, box, or other container of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers that are normally sold or intended to be sold at retail. Package does not include containers that contain smaller packaging units of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, including, but not limited to, cartons, cases, bales, or boxes.
SEC. 3.Section 22978.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22978.3.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, upon discovery by the department or a law enforcement agency that a wholesaler possesses, stores, or owns flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, or has made a sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, the department or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers possessed, stored, owned, or sold by the wholesaler.
(2)Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency shall be delivered to the department, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers will be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation. Any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the department or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency shall be deemed forfeited to the state and the department shall comply with procedures set forth in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 30435) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b)(1)In addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers described in subdivision (a), the department shall impose a civil penalty upon the wholesaler equal to fifty dollars ($50) per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the department by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer. The department shall impose the civil penalty in accordance with the procedures applicable to the civil penalty authorized in Section 22978.7.
(2)In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall suspend the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)In the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers made pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall revoke the license of the wholesaler in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(4)Civil penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund created pursuant to Section 22990.
(c)Upon discovery by the department that a distributor, wholesaler, or other person has made a sale in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and, for wholesalers, if neither the department nor a law enforcement agency seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers from the wholesaler pursuant to subdivision (a), all of the following shall apply:
(1)Upon a first offense, the department shall issue a warning notice to the distributor, wholesaler, or other person.
(2)Upon a second offense, the department shall suspend the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(3)Upon a third offense, the department shall revoke the license of the distributor, wholesaler, or other person in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 22980.3.
(d)The appeals procedures applicable to Section 22978.7 shall apply to the warning notice, suspension, and revocation actions taken by the department pursuant to this section.
SEC. 2.SEC. 4.Section 22980 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22980.(a)A peace officer or department employee granted limited peace officer status pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 830.11 of the Penal Code, upon presenting appropriate credentials, is authorized to enter any place as described in paragraph (2) or (3) and to conduct inspections in accordance with all of the following:
(1)Inspections shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
(2)Inspections may be at any place at which cigarettes or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored or at any site where evidence of activities involving evasion of cigarette or tobacco products tax and violations of Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code may be discovered.
(3)Inspections may be at any place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.1 or 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(4)Inspections shall be requested or conducted no more than once in a 24-hour period.
(b)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection shall be subject to the penalties imposed pursuant to Section 22981.
SEC. 5.Section 22990 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22990.(a)All moneys collected pursuant to this division shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. No moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund shall be used to supplant state or local General Fund money for any purpose.
(b)All moneys in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund are available for expenditure, upon appropriation by the Legislature, solely for the purpose of implementing, enforcing, and administering the California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003. 2003, including the seizure and destruction of cigarettes and tobacco products.
SEC. 3.SEC. 6.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)(1)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
(A)Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B)Describes, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 301 et seq.) has been sought and, if so, the status of any request for that authorization, approval, or order.
(C)Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(2)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand styles lack of characterizing flavor.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(3)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and documentation regarding tobacco product status, packaging, or marketing of a brand style.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph and designated as nonpublic shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(f)(1)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(2)(A)The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination.
(B)Removal of a brand style from the UTL will be effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C)A manufacturer or importer may provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in paragraph (1) within 30 days of the notice provided pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(D)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state. import.
(k)(1)Every manufacturer and importer submission under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) shall be accompanied by an initial application fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. The Attorney General shall collect an annual renewal fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of maintaining the UTL, to offset the costs associated with operating the UTL. The fee shall be for the fiscal year ending June 30 and shall not be prorated.
(2)Application and renewal fees received under this subdivision shall be deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of processing the submissions and operating the UTL.
(l)(1)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2)A manufacturer or importer may challenge a decision by the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1) in addition to providing additional materials to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision (f).
(m)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
(n)A person shall not affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes as described in Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 30161) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30101) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.(o)(n)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(p)A distributor(o)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), a distributor or wholesaler shall not sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. For A delivery seller shall not sell a tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California.
(2)This subdivision does not apply to the sale of tobacco products by a distributor or wholesaler to a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, or any other person that the state, pursuant to the United States Constitution, the laws of the United States, or the California Constitution, is prohibited from regulating.
(3)For each tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor distributor, wholesaler, or delivery seller according to the following schedule:
(1)(A)A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)(B)A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation. violation within a five-year period.
(3)(C)A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)(D)A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)(E)A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(q)(p)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(r)(q)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations determinations, requiring reporting of delivery sales of tobacco products and constitutionally exempted distributions of flavored tobacco products, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(s)(r)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(t)(s)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104559.5, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)Tobacco product flavor enhancer has the same meaning as defined in Section 104559.5.
(5)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(u)(t)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 4.SEC. 7.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 5.Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30165.1.(a)The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this section:(1)Department means the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.(2)Brand family means styles of cigarettes sold under the same trademark and differentiated from one another by means of additional modifiers, including, but not limited to, menthol, lights, kings, and 100s, and includes any brand name, alone or in conjunction with any other word, trademark, logo, symbol, motto, selling message, recognizable pattern of colors, or any other indicia of product identification identical or similar to, or identifiable with, a previously known brand of cigarettes.(3)Brand style means any particular combination of trademark and modifiers within a brand family.(4)Cigarette has the same meaning as in subdivision (d) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code and includes tobacco products defined as a cigarette under that subdivision.(5)Directory means the California Tobacco Directory developed by the Attorney General and published on its internet website pursuant to subdivision (c).(6)Distributor has the same meaning as in Section 30011.(7)MSA means the Master Settlement Agreement, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.(8)Nonparticipating manufacturer means any tobacco product manufacturer that is not a participating manufacturer.(9)Participating manufacturer has the same meaning as in subsection II(jj) of the MSA.(10)Qualified escrow fund has the same meaning as in subdivision (f) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.(11)Tobacco product manufacturer has the same meaning as in subdivision (i) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.(12)Units sold has the same meaning as in subdivision (j) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.(b)Every tobacco product manufacturer whose cigarettes are sold in this state, whether directly or through a distributor, retailer, or similar intermediary or intermediaries, shall execute and deliver on a form and in the manner prescribed by the Attorney General, a certification to the Attorney General no later than April 30 of each year that, as of the date of the certification, the tobacco product manufacturer is either a participating manufacturer that has made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due under the Master Settlement Agreement, except to the extent the participating manufacturer is disputing any of the payments, or is a nonparticipating manufacturer in full compliance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including all installment payments required by that article and this section, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. A tobacco product manufacturer located outside of the United States shall provide to the Attorney General and keep current, the names, and addresses, including email addresses, of all importers that sell or will be selling their cigarettes in this state and shall cause each importer to provide to the Attorney General a copy of a valid importer permit issued by the United States Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, and the importer license issued by the department. The importers who sell or will be selling their cigarettes in this state shall obtain and maintain a license as an importer in compliance with Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code. Any person who makes a certification pursuant to this subdivision that asserts the truth of any material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment of up to one year in the county jail, or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both the imprisonment and the fine.(1)A participating manufacturer shall include in its certification a complete list of its brand families and brand styles. The participating manufacturer shall update the list 30 days before any addition to or modification of its brand families and brand styles by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the Attorney General.(2)A nonparticipating manufacturer shall include in its certification a complete list of all of its brand families and brand styles in accordance with all of the following requirements:(A)Separately listing brand families and brand styles of cigarettes and the number of units sold for each brand family that were sold in the state during the preceding calendar year.(B)Separately listing all of its brand families and brand styles that have been sold in the state at any time during the current calendar year.(C)Indicating by an asterisk any brand family or brand style sold in the state during the preceding calendar year that is no longer being sold in the state as of the date of the certification.(D)Identifying by name and address any other tobacco product manufacturer, including all previous fabricators or makers of the brand families, in a form, manner, and detail as required by the Attorney General. The tobacco product manufacturer shall update the list 30 days before any change in a fabricator for any brand family or any addition to or modification of its brand families by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the Attorney General.(3)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the certification shall further certify all of the following:(A)That the nonparticipating manufacturer is registered to do business in the state, or has appointed a resident agent for service of process and provided notice thereof as required by subdivision (f).(B)That the nonparticipating manufacturer has done all of the following:(i)Established and continues to maintain a qualified escrow fund as that term is defined in subdivision (f) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code and implementing regulations.(ii)Executed a qualified escrow agreement that has been reviewed and approved by the Attorney General and that governs the qualified escrow fund.(iii)The certifying nonparticipating manufacturer fabricates all of the brand families of the cigarettes it seeks to certify.(C)That the nonparticipating manufacturer is in full compliance with both of the following:(i)Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, this section, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.(ii)Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall also provide a copy of a valid, corresponding federal permit issued by the United States Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.(D)That the nonparticipating manufacturer has provided all of the following:(i)The name, address, and telephone number of the financial institution where the nonparticipating manufacturer has established the qualified escrow fund required pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and all regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.(ii)The account number of the qualified escrow fund and subaccount number for the State of California.(iii)The amount the nonparticipating manufacturer placed in the qualified escrow fund for cigarettes sold in the state during the preceding calendar year, the date and amount of each deposit, and any confirming evidence or verification as may be deemed necessary by the Attorney General.(iv)The amounts and dates of any withdrawal or transfer of funds the nonparticipating manufacturer made at any time from the qualified escrow fund or from any other qualified escrow fund into which it ever made escrow payments pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and all regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.(E)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer located outside the United States, that the manufacturer has provided a declaration in a form prescribed by the Attorney General from each of its importers into the United States of any of its brand families to be sold in the state, that the importer accepts joint and several liability with the nonparticipating manufacturer for all escrow deposits due and all penalties assessed in accordance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and for payment of all fees, costs, attorneys fees, penalties, and refunds imposed or required under this section, including, but not limited to, all refunds resulting from the removal of the nonparticipating manufacturer or any of its brand families or brand styles from the Directory. The declaration shall appoint for the declarant a resident agent for service of process in California in accordance with subdivision (f) and affirm that the declarant has caused every importer that will sell its cigarettes in this state to obtain and maintain a license as an importer pursuant to Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code.(4)(A)A tobacco product manufacturer may not include a brand family in its certification unless either of the following is true:(i)In the case of a participating manufacturer, the participating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of calculating its payments under the MSA for the relevant year, in the volume and shares determined pursuant to the MSA.(ii)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.(B)Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the states right to maintain that a brand family constitutes cigarettes of a different tobacco product manufacturer for purposes of calculating payments under the MSA or for purposes of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.(5)A tobacco product manufacturer shall maintain all invoices and documentation of sales and other information relied upon for the certification for a period of five years, unless otherwise required by law to maintain them for a longer period of time.(c)The Attorney General shall develop and publish on its internet website the California Tobacco Directory, which shall list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with this section and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.(1)The Attorney General may not include or retain in the Directory the name, brand families, or brand styles of any of the following:(A)Any participating manufacturer that fails to provide the required certification or to make a payment calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA except to the extent that it is disputing the payment.(B)Any nonparticipating manufacturer that fails to provide the required certification or whose certification the Attorney General determines is not in compliance with subdivision (b), unless the Attorney General has determined that the violation has been cured to the satisfaction of the Attorney General.(C)A tobacco product manufacturer that does not hold a valid and current manufacturers license under Section 22979 of the Business and Professions Code, including, but not limited to, a manufacturer whose license has been revoked under subdivision (g) of Section 22979 of the Business and Professions Code.(2)A tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style shall not be included or retained in the Directory if the Attorney General concludes that any of the following is true:(A)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, any escrow deposit required pursuant to Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code for any period for any brand family, whether or not listed by the nonparticipating manufacturer, has not been fully deposited into a qualified escrow fund governed by a qualified escrow agreement that has been approved by the Attorney General.(B)Any outstanding final judgment, including interest thereon, for violations of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, this section, Sections 30101.7 and 30165.2, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those sections, has not been fully satisfied for the brand family and the tobacco product manufacturer.(C)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer by reason of the business plan, business history, trade connections, or compliance and payment history in the state or any other state of any of the principals thereof, the nonparticipating manufacturer fails to provide reasonable assurance that it will comply with the requirements of this section, Section 30165.2, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code. As used in this section, reasonable assurance may include information and documentation establishing to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that a failure to pay in California or elsewhere was the result of a good faith dispute over the payment obligation.(D)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturer has knowingly failed to disclose any material information required or knowingly made any material false statements in the certification of any supporting information or documentation provided.(E)If the tobacco product manufacturer or its importer, as defined in Section 30019, engages in delivery sales and the tobacco product manufacturer fails to provide or fails to cause its importer to provide reasonable assurances that the delivery seller has fully complied with all requirements of applicable federal and state law, including, but not limited to, all of the following:(i)Chapter 10A (commencing with Section 375) of Title 15 of the United States Code.(ii)The requirements of Section 30101.7.(iii)All stamping, marking, and labeling requirements, including, but not limited to, Section 30163, and any other information or indicia requirements imposed by state or federal law.(iv)All other state laws generally applicable to the sale and distribution of tobacco products.(3)The Attorney General may not include or retain in the Directory any brand style that has not been tested and marked in compliance with the California Cigarette Fire Safety and Firefighter Protection Act (Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code).(4)All listings on the Directory shall expire on April 29 of each year. Beginning with the 2023 calendar year, a tobacco product manufacturer shall renew its listing on the Directory by providing the annual certification in compliance with this section and remitting an annual fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per tobacco product manufacturer payable to the office of the Attorney General. Any fees received pursuant to this paragraph shall be deposited into the California Tobacco Directory Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited in the California Tobacco Directory Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of administering the Directory. The Attorney General may retain a listing for a tobacco product manufacturer on the Directory while the renewal for the certification is pending, provided that if the Attorney General decides not to retain a listing of any manufacturer or brand family while the renewal of the certification is pending, the Attorney General shall comply with the delisting provisions in this section, including paragraph (5).(5)The Attorney General shall update the Directory as necessary in order to correct mistakes and to add or remove a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style to keep the Directory in conformity with the requirements of this section, Section 30165.2, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and the California Cigarette Fire Safety and Firefighter Protection Act (Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code). The Attorney General shall promptly provide distributors and wholesalers with written notice of each tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, and brand style that the Attorney General has added to, or excluded or removed from, the Directory.(A)When the Attorney Generals office informs a manufacturer that it will recommend to the Attorney General that the manufacturer or brand family be delisted for cause, the office shall transmit by email, or other practicable means, a copy of the notice of the pending administrative action to the manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and to any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose.(B)A licensed distributor may purchase, stamp, or sell, and a licensed wholesaler may purchase or sell, products affected by the notice of pending administrative action for no more than 40 days following issuance of the notice of pending administrative action. Before the sale of a product affected by the notice of pending administrative action, and no later than seven days after the notice of pending administrative action, a distributor or wholesaler shall notify each of its existing customers of the pending administrative action.(C)Upon removal from the Directory of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style, the Attorney General shall transmit by email, or other practicable means, a notice of removal, to the manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and to any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose. No later than seven days after issuance of the notice of removal, a distributor or wholesaler shall provide each of its existing customers a copy of the notice of removal.(D)Notwithstanding subdivision (e), a licensed retailer may possess, transport, and sell the tax-stamped cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style affected by the notice of removal for no more than 60 days following the effective date of the tobacco product manufacturers brand familys or brand styles removal from the Directory.(E)After 60 days following removal from the Directory, the cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style identified in the notice of removal are contraband and are subject to seizure and destruction under subdivision (e) of Section 30436 and subdivision (b) of Section 30449, and may not be purchased or sold in the state. This section does not limit or otherwise change the seizure and destruction process of cigarettes under Sections 14950 to 14959, inclusive, of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, Section 14956 of the Health and Safety Code.(F)If the Attorney General declines to remove a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style from the Directory following issuance of the notice of pending administrative action described in subparagraph (A), the Attorney General shall notify by email, or other practicable means, the tobacco product manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose, of the decision not to pursue administrative action. No later than seven days after issuance of this notice, a distributor or wholesaler shall provide each of its existing customers a copy of this notice, and the purchase, stamping, and sales restrictions imposed by subparagraph (B) shall have no further effect.(G)Upon request of the Attorney General, the department shall provide the Attorney General all email addresses for licensed distributors, wholesalers, and retailers in the departments possession.(6)Newly qualified and elevated-risk nonparticipating manufacturers shall file with the Attorney General a surety bond in a form and manner directed by the Attorney General.(A)Notwithstanding any other law, if a newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturer is to be listed in the Directory or if the Attorney General reasonably determines that any nonparticipating manufacturer who has filed a certification pursuant to subdivision (b) poses an elevated risk for noncompliance with this section, Section 30165.2, Part 13 (commencing with Section 30001) of Division 2, or with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, neither the nonparticipating manufacturer nor any of its brand families shall be included in the Directory unless and until the nonparticipating manufacturer, or its United States importer that undertakes joint and several liability for the nonparticipating manufacturers performance in accordance with subparagraph (E) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), has posted a bond in accordance with this section.(B)The bonds shall be posted by a corporate surety located within the United States in an amount equal to the greater of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or the amount of escrow the nonparticipating manufacturer in either its current or predecessor form was required to deposit as a result of the largest of its most recent five calendar years sales in California. The bond shall be written in favor of the State of California and shall be conditioned on the performance by the nonparticipating manufacturer, or its importer that undertakes joint and several liability for the nonparticipating manufacturers performance in accordance with subparagraph (E) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), of all its duties and obligations under this section and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and payment of all state taxes for the sale or distribution of cigarettes and tobacco products in this state during the year in which the certification is filed and the next succeeding calendar year. The bond may be drawn upon by the department or the Attorney General to cover unsatisfied escrow obligations, tax obligations, claims for penalties, claims for monetary damages, and any other liabilities that are subject to a claim of sovereign immunity against enforcement of the laws specified above.(C)A nonparticipating manufacturer may be deemed to pose an elevated risk for noncompliance with this section, Section 30165.2, or Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code if any of the following apply:(i)The nonparticipating manufacturer or any affiliate thereof has failed to deposit fully the amount due on an escrow obligation with respect to any state at any time during the current calendar year or within the past three calendar years unless either of the following occur:(I)The nonparticipating manufacturer did not underdeposit knowingly or recklessly and the manufacturer promptly cured the underdeposit within 180 days of notice of it.(II)The underdeposit or lack of deposit is the subject of a good faith dispute as documented to the satisfaction of the Attorney General and the underdeposit or lack of deposit is cured within 180 days of entry of a final order establishing the amount of the required escrow deposit.(ii)Any state has removed the nonparticipating manufacturer or its brand families or an affiliate or any of the affiliates brand families from the states tobacco Directory for noncompliance with a state escrow deposit or tobacco tax law at any time during the calendar year or within the past three calendar years.(iii)Any state has litigation pending against, or an unsatisfied final judgment against, the nonparticipating manufacturer or any affiliate thereof for escrow or for penalties, fees, costs, refunds, or attorneys fees related to noncompliance with state escrow laws.(iv)The nonparticipating manufacturer sells its cigarettes or tobacco products directly to consumers via remote or other non-face-to-face means.(v)A state or federal court has determined that the nonparticipating manufacturer has violated any tobacco tax or tobacco control law or engaged in unfair business practice or unfair competition.(vi)Any state has suspended or revoked the nonparticipating manufacturers license to engage in any aspect of tobacco business.(vii)Any state or federal court has determined that the nonparticipating manufacturer failed to comply with state or federal law imposing marking, labeling, and stamping requirements or requiring information to be affixed to, or contained in, the labels, markings, or packaging.(viii)During any of the past three years, escrow and equity fee payments were made on less than 80 percent of the nonparticipating manufacturers nationwide cigarette sales as measured by excise taxes collected by the federal government and, in the case of Puerto Rico, arbitrios de cigarrillos collected by the Puerto Rico taxing authority.(ix)As of January 1, 2023, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in or into the state by distributors that have not reported their last 12 months of in-state sales electronically and in the manner prescribed by both the department and the Attorney General.(x)For a domestic manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in the state through one or more distributors that do not purchase directly from the nonparticipating manufacturer. For a foreign manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in the state through one or more distributors that do not purchase directly from an importer that has accepted joint and several liability pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (f).(xi)The nonparticipating manufacturer fails to submit or complete any required forms, documents, certification, or notices, in a timely manner or, to the satisfaction of the Attorney General or the department.(D)As used in this paragraph, newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturer means a nonparticipating manufacturer that has not previously been listed in the Directory during the last 12 months. These newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturers may be required to post a bond in accordance with this section for the next three years of their listing, or longer if they have been determined to pose an elevated risk for noncompliance.(7)The Attorney General shall provide each tobacco product manufacturer that has provided all certifications and other information required by this section with a written acknowledgment of receipt within seven business days after receiving the certifications and other materials. Each tobacco product manufacturer shall provide to each distributor to whom it sells or ships cigarettes a copy of each acknowledgment of receipt provided to the tobacco product manufacturer by the Attorney General. Upon request, the Attorney General shall provide any distributor with a copy of the most recent written acknowledgment of receipt provided to the tobacco product manufacturer.(8)The Attorney General shall not include or retain in the directory any brand style that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code.(d)(1)The Attorney General may exclude or remove from the Directory a tobacco product manufacturer or any of its brand families, based on a determination that the manufacturer is not a participating manufacturer that has provided the required certification and made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA, except to the extent that it is disputing the payment, or in the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, has not made all escrow payments required by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, in accordance with that subdivision, or has not complied with this section or Section 30165.2, or the tobacco product manufacturer has not complied with any state or federal delivery sales laws applicable to sales and distribution of tobacco products in this state. Before the exclusion or removal may take effect, the Attorney General shall notify the tobacco product manufacturer of this determination.(2)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1), the tobacco product manufacturer may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, and may seek relief from the determination, by filing a petition for writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure for that purpose in the Superior Court for the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination, if the participating manufacturer has made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA, except to the extent that it is disputing payment, or if a nonparticipating manufacturer has paid into escrow the full amount of any deficiency in the escrow payments that the Attorney General has determined the nonparticipating manufacturer was required to have made under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, including any installment payments required under subdivision (h), pending final resolution of the action.(e)(1)A person shall not affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 30163, or pay the tax levied pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2 on a tobacco product defined as a cigarette under this section, unless the brand family and brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco product, and the tobacco product manufacturer that makes or sells the cigarettes, are included on the Directory.(2)A person shall not sell, offer, or possess for sale in this state, ship or otherwise distribute into or within this state or import for personal consumption in this state, cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style not included in the Directory.(3)A person shall not do either of the following:(A)Sell or distribute cigarettes that the person knows or should know are intended to be distributed in violation of paragraphs (1) and (2).(B)Acquire, hold, own, possess, transport, import, or cause to be imported cigarettes that the person knows or should know are intended to be distributed in violation of paragraphs (1) and (2).(f)(1)A nonresident or foreign nonparticipating manufacturer that has not registered to do business in the state as a foreign corporation or business entity shall, as a condition precedent to having its brand families or brand styles listed or retained in the Directory, appoint and continually engage without interruption the services of an agent in this state to act as agent for the service of process on whom all process, and any action or proceeding against the nonresident or foreign nonparticipating manufacturer concerning or arising out of the enforcement of this section, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, may be served in any manner authorized by law. This service shall constitute legal and valid service of process on the nonparticipating manufacturer. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide the name, address, telephone number, and proof of the appointment and availability of the agent to the satisfaction of the Attorney General. A nonparticipating manufacturer located outside of the United States shall, as an additional condition precedent to having its brand families listed or retained in the Directory, cause each of its importers into the United States of any of its brand families to be sold in the state to appoint and continually engage without interruption the services of an agent in the state in accordance with this section. All obligations of a nonparticipating manufacturer imposed by this section with respect to appointment of its agent shall likewise apply to importers with respect to appointment of their agents.(2)The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide notice to the Attorney General 30 calendar days before termination of the authority of an agent and shall further provide proof to the satisfaction of the Attorney General of the appointment of a new agent no less than five calendar days before the termination of an existing agent appointment. In the event an agent terminates an agency appointment, the nonparticipating manufacturer shall notify the Attorney General of said termination within five calendar days and shall include proof to the satisfaction of the Attorney General of the appointment of a new agent.(3)(A)A nonparticipating manufacturer whose products are sold in this state without appointing or designating an agent as herein required shall be deemed to have appointed the Secretary of State as its agent. The appointment of the Secretary of State as the agent for service of process pursuant to this provision does not satisfy the condition precedent specified in paragraph (1) to having its brand families listed or retained in the Directory.(B)The Attorney General or their authorized representative may proceed against a nonparticipating manufacturer in the courts of this state pursuant to subparagraph (A) by service of process upon the Secretary of State. The service may be made by delivering by hand to the Secretary of State or their authorized representative one copy of the process for each defendant to be served, together with a declaration stating that service is being made upon the Secretary of State pursuant to subparagraph (A), setting forth the last known address of the nonparticipating manufacturer, and signed by the party to the action seeking service.(C)Upon receipt of the records described in subparagraph (B), the Secretary of State or their authorized representative shall give notice of the service of process to any nonparticipating manufacturer served by forwarding a copy of the process to the nonparticipating manufacturer at the last known address identified in the declaration.(4)For each nonparticipating manufacturer located outside the United States, each importer into the United States of any nonparticipating manufacturers brand families that are sold in the state shall bear joint and several liability with the nonparticipating manufacturer for deposit of all escrow due under, and payment of all costs and attorneys fees imposed in accordance with, Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, and payment of all fees, costs, attorneys fees, penalties, and refunds imposed or required by this section or Section 30165.2. Each tobacco product manufacturer and importer, that sells or intends to sell cigarettes in California, shall obtain and maintain a license as a manufacturer or importer in compliance with Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code. Each nonparticipating manufacturer and its importers shall report in the manner, including electronically, as required by the Attorney General, all cigarettes sold in this state each month, including, but not limited to, the quantity, including tobacco weight and number of cigarettes, the wholesale cost, and sale price of each brand family and brand style. Any tobacco product manufacturer or importer that fails to file the report as required by the Attorney General shall be liable for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of either of the following:(A)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes that were not reported as required by the Attorney General.(B)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).(g)(1)Not later than 25 days after the end of each calendar quarter, and more frequently if directed by the department or the Attorney General, each distributor shall submit any information as the department or Attorney General requires to facilitate compliance with this section, including, but not limited to, a list by brand family of the total number of cigarettes or, in the case of roll your own, the total ounces for which the distributor affixed stamps during the previous calendar month or otherwise paid the tax due. The distributor shall maintain, and shall make available to the department and the Attorney General, all invoices and documentation of sales of all nonparticipating manufacturer cigarettes and any other information relied upon in reporting to the department and the Attorney General for a period of five years.(2)(A)Notwithstanding Section 30455, the department shall disclose to the Attorney General any information received under this part for purposes of determining compliance with and enforcing the provisions of this section, Sections 30101.7 and 30165.2, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. The department and Attorney General may share the information received under this section with any of the following:(i)Other federal, state, or local agencies for purposes of enforcing this section, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, or corresponding laws of other states or the United States.(ii)A court arbitrator, or data clearinghouse or similar entity for purposes of resolving disputes arising under, and making calculations and determinations required by, the MSA or related settlement agreements and with counsel for the parties or expert witnesses in any such proceeding, provided that the recipients agree to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information.(B)The department and Attorney General shall not publicly disclose confidential information except as necessary to carry out their functions and duties.(3)At any time, the Attorney General may require from the nonparticipating manufacturer proof from the financial institution in which the manufacturer has established a qualified escrow fund for the purpose of compliance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, of the amount of money in the fund being held on behalf of the state and the dates of deposits, and listing the amounts of all withdrawals from the fund and the dates thereof.(4)In addition to the information required to be submitted pursuant to this section or Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, the Attorney General may require a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, importer, or tobacco product manufacturer to submit any additional information, including, but not limited to, samples of the packaging or labeling of each brand family, as is necessary to enable the Attorney General to determine whether a tobacco product manufacturer or importer has complied, is in compliance, and, if applicable pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), has provided reasonable assurance that it will comply or continue to comply with this section, Section 30165.2, Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.(h)To promote compliance with this section, the Attorney General may promulgate regulations requiring a tobacco product manufacturer subject to the requirements of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 to make the escrow deposits required in quarterly or other specified installments during the year in which the sales covered by the deposits are made. The Attorney General may require production of information sufficient to enable the Attorney General to determine the adequacy of the amount of the installment deposit.(i)(1)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, upon a finding that a distributor licensed by the department has violated subdivision (e), or paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), the department may take the following actions:(A)In the case of the first offense, the department may revoke or suspend the license or licenses issued to the distributor by the department, pursuant to the procedures applicable to the revocation of a license set forth in Sections 30148 and 30158, and Section 22980.3 of the Business and Professions Code. Each stamp affixed and each sale or offer to sell cigarettes in violation of subdivision (e) shall constitute a separate violation.(B)In the case of a second or any subsequent offense that the department determines to be a violation of subdivision (e), in addition to the action authorized under subparagraph (A), the department may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of either of the following:(i)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes.(ii)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).(2)(A)A distributor licensed by the department in any action for a violation of subdivision (e) shall have a defense provided that either of the following is true:(i)At the time of the violation, the cigarettes or tobacco products claimed to be the subject of the alleged violation belonged to a brand family and brand style that was included on the Directory.(ii)At the time of the violation, the distributor possessed a copy of the Attorney Generals most recent written acknowledgment of receipt of the certifications and other information required as a condition of including the brand family and brand style on the Directory.(B)The defense described in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) is not available to a distributor if, at the time of the violation, the Attorney General had provided the distributor with written notice that the brand family or brand style had been excluded or removed from the Directory, or the distributor failed to provide the Attorney General with a current address for the receipt of written notice through email as required by paragraph (4) of subdivision (c).(3)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, the Attorney General may bring a civil action on behalf of the state for civil penalties and injunctive relief against a retailer, distributor, wholesaler, manufacturer, importer, or other person that violates subdivision (e), or paragraph (1) or (4) of subdivision (g). The court, upon a finding of a violation, shall impose a civil penalty to be paid to the General Fund. The amount of the civil penalty may not exceed the greater of either of the following:(A)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes.(B)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).(4)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, the Attorney General may bring a civil action on behalf of the state for civil penalties and injunctive relief against any nonparticipating manufacturer that does not submit timely, complete, and accurate certifications to the Attorney General under this section and subdivision (c) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code regarding its sales of cigarettes in this state, whether directly or through a distributor, retailers, or similar intermediary or intermediaries, and tobacco escrow account compliance for its ongoing and previous sales in this state. The court, upon a finding of a violation, may do both of the following:(A)Impose a civil penalty to be paid to the General Fund not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day the nonparticipating manufacturer fails to timely, completely, and accurately certify to the Attorney General.(B)Issue an injunction prohibiting the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes from being sold in or into the state until the failure to certify has been fully cured.(5)A violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (e) shall constitute a misdemeanor.(j)If a distributor affixes a stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes under subdivision (a) of Section 30163, or pays the tax levied under Sections 30123 and 30131.2 on a tobacco product defined as a cigarette under this section, during the period between the date on which the brand family of the cigarettes or tobacco product was excluded or removed from the Directory and the date on which the distributor received notice of the exclusion or removal under paragraph (4) of subdivision (c), then both of the following shall apply:(1)The distributor shall be entitled to a credit for the tax paid by the distributor with respect to the cigarette or tobacco product to which the stamp or meter impression was affixed, or the tax paid during that period. The distributor shall comply with regulations prescribed by the department regarding refunds and credits that are adopted pursuant to Section 30177.5. If the distributor has sold the cigarette or tobacco product to a wholesaler or retailer, and has received payment from the wholesaler or retailer, the distributor shall provide the credit to the wholesaler or retailer.(2)The brand family may not be included on or restored to the Directory until the tobacco product manufacturer has reimbursed the distributor for the cost to the distributor of the cigarettes or tobacco product to which the stamp or meter impression was affixed, or the tax paid, during that period.(k)Any tobacco product manufacturer that falsely represents any of the following to any person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for each false representation:(1)Any information required under subdivision (b).(2)That the tobacco product manufacturer is a participating manufacturer.(3)That the tobacco product manufacturer or any other person has made any or all escrow payments required by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, if applicable to the manufacturer.(4)That it has complied with subdivision (b), or with paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), if applicable to the tobacco product manufacturer.(l)A violation of subdivision (e) shall constitute unfair competition under Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code.(m)A person shall not be issued a distributors license pursuant to Section 30140 unless that person has certified in writing that the person will comply fully with this section. Any person who makes a certification pursuant to this subdivision that asserts the truth of any material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment of up to one year in the county jail, or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both the imprisonment and the fine.(n)The Attorney General may adopt rules and regulations to implement this section. The rules and regulations may establish procedures for including in the Directory tobacco product manufacturers that are not participating manufacturers and were not required to make escrow payments under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, for sales made during any preceding calendar year, and brand families of those tobacco product manufacturers. The rules and regulations may also establish procedures for seizure and destruction of cigarettes forfeited to the state pursuant to Section 30436 or Section 30449, including, but not limited to, the state facilities that may be used for the destruction of contraband cigarettes. Nothing in this section shall affect the authority of local law enforcement and local government officials to seize and destroy contraband under existing state or local law. The regulations adopted to effect the purposes of this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. For purposes of that chapter, including Section 11349.6 of the Government Code, the adoption of the regulations shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and general welfare. Notwithstanding subdivision (e) of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code, the regulations shall be repealed 180 days after their effective date, unless the adopting authority or agency complies with that chapter, as provided in subdivision (e) of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code.(o)In any action brought by the state to enforce this section, the state shall be entitled to recover the costs of investigation, expert witness fees, costs of the action, and reasonable attorneys fees.(p)The Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative shall have the authority to:(1)Conduct audits and investigations of the following:(A)A nonparticipating manufacturer and its importers.(B)Distributors, retailers, and wholesalers, as defined in Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Profession Code, and this part.(C)Persons or entities engaged in delivery sales as defined in Section 30101.7.(2)Upon reasonable cause to believe that a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, issue subpoenas, compel the attendance of witnesses, administer oaths, certify to official acts, take depositions within and without the state, as now provided by law, and compel the production of pertinent books, payrolls, accounts, papers, records, documents, and testimony relevant to investigations. If a person refuses, without good cause, to be examined or to answer a legal and pertinent question, or to produce a document or other evidence when ordered to do so by the Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative, the Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative may apply to the superior court of the county where the person is in attendance or located, upon affidavit, for an order returnable in no less than two nor more than five days, directing the person to show cause why the person should not be examined, answer a legal or pertinent question, or produce a document, record, or other evidence. Upon the hearing, if the court determines that the person, without good cause, has refused to be examined, answer legal or pertinent questions, or produce a document, record, or other evidence, the court may order compliance with the subpoena and assess all costs and reasonable attorneys fees against the person. If the motion for an order is granted and the person thereafter fails to comply with the order, the court may make orders as are provided for by law. Subpoenas shall be served and witness fees and mileage paid as allowed in civil cases in the courts of the State of California.(q)In any action regarding a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, or of Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code, reports submitted to the department pursuant to Section 30182 or Section 22978.1, 22978.4, or 22978.5 of the Business and Professions Code, shall be admissible in evidence and shall be presumed to accurately state the number of cigarettes stamped during the time period by the stamping agent that submitted the report absent a contrary showing by the nonparticipating manufacturer or importer. Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the right of the state to maintain that reports are incorrect or do not accurately reflect a nonparticipating manufacturers sales in the state during the time period in question, and the presumption shall not apply in the event the state does so maintain.(r)In any action regarding a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, or of Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code, sufficient notice of the action to the alleged violator shall be given by complaint written in the English language. The state shall not be required to bear any expense of translating the complaint into another language.(s)Unless otherwise expressly provided, the remedies or penalties provided by this section are cumulative to each other and to the remedies or penalties available under all other laws of this state.SEC. 6.Section 30435 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30435.(a)An employee of the department, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, is authorized to enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place described in subdivision (b) or (c).(b)Any building, facility, site, or place at which cigarette or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored, or any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed under this part, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the Master Settlement Agreement, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, Section 30165.1.(c)Any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.(d)Any inspection performed under the authority of this section shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at a reasonable time, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the building, facility, site, or place that is inspected.(e)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection authorized under this section is subject to the penalty imposed by Section 30471.SEC. 7.Section 30436 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30436.The following property, upon seizure by the department, is hereby forfeited to the state:(a)Cigarettes or tobacco products transported upon the highways, roads, or streets of this state in violation of Section 30431 or Section 30432.(b)Cigarettes not contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamp or meter impressions or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid, which are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent of the person to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products without payment of the taxes imposed by this part.(c)Any cigarette or tobacco product vending machine, together with the cigarettes, tobacco products, money, or other contents thereof, that has been loaded, in whole or in part, with packages of cigarettes that do not have California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions affixed or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid.(d)Cigarettes contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions in violation of Section 30163.(e)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2, in violation of Section 30165.1, regardless of whether the violation is subject to the defense described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 30165.1.(f)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code. SEC. 8.Section 30449 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30449.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (b), any property, except money, forfeited to the state under this chapter shall be sold by the department at public auction. Notice of the sale shall be given by posting a written notice of the time and place of sale in three public places in the county where the property is to be sold for not less than five days nor more than 10 days before the sale. If the department is unable to sell any property forfeited to the state under this part or, if the department determines that the property is unsalable, it may destroy that property.(b)(1)Any property forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.(2)Any cigarettes forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.(3)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.(4)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code shall be destroyed.(c)(1)A record shall be kept of all property destroyed pursuant to this section showing the nature of the property, the quantity, the reason for, and the cost and manner of destruction.(2)The person from whom the property was seized shall be liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this section.(3)The proceeds of the sale and any money forfeited to the state shall be deposited in the General Fund.SEC. 8.Section 30101.7 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30101.7.(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to facilitate the collection of all applicable state surtaxes, sales or use taxes, and escrow and other payment obligations on cigarettes sold to residents of the state and to ensure compliance with the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 (PACT Act; Public Law 111-154).
(b)Except as provided in subdivision (d), no person may engage in a retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products in California unless the sale is a vendor-assisted, face-to-face sale.
(c)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1)Cigarette has the same meaning as provided in Section 375 of Title 15 of the United States Code, as amended from time to time.
(1)(2)Consumer means a person who purchases cigarettes or tobacco products. Consumer does not include any person licensed under this part or under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code and lawfully operating as a manufacturer, distributor, wholesaler, or retailer of cigarettes or tobacco products.
(2)(3)Delivery sale means sale of cigarettes or tobacco products into and in this state in either of the following cases:
(A)The consumer submits the order for the sale by means of a telephone or other method of voice transmission, the mail, or the Internet or other online service, or the seller is otherwise not in the physical presence of the consumer when the request for purchase or order is made.
(B)The cigarettes or tobacco products are delivered to the consumer by common carrier, private delivery service, or other method of remote delivery, or the seller is not in the physical presence of the consumer when the consumer obtains possession of the cigarettes or tobacco products.
(3)(4)Delivery seller means a person who makes a delivery sale.
(4)(5)Face-to-face sale means a sale in which the purchaser is in the physical presence of the seller or the sellers employee or agent at the time of the sale. A face-to-face sale does not include a delivery sale.
(5)(6)Indian country shall have the same meaning as provided in Section 1151 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and includes any other land held by the United States in trust or restricted status for one or more Indian tribes.
(6)(7)Interstate commerce means commerce between a state and any place outside the state, commerce between a state and Indian country in the state, or commerce between points in the same state but through a place outside of the state or through any Indian country.
(7)(8)Tobacco products shall have the same meaning as otherwise defined under this part with the exception of cigars.
(d)A person may engage in delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products to a person in California provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The delivery seller has fully complied with all of the requirements of Chapter 10A (commencing with Section 375) of Title 15 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Jenkins Act.
(2)The delivery seller obtains and maintains any applicable license under this part and under Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within this state.
(3)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law that imposes escrow or other payment obligations on tobacco product manufacturers, including, but not limited to, Sections 104555 to 104557, inclusive, of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)The delivery seller complies with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location, including Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code, as if the delivery sales occurred entirely within the state and place.
(4)(5)The Attorney General may require the delivery seller to report to the Attorney General its delivery sales of cigarettes and tobacco products to California consumers in the form and manner specified by the Attorney General.
(e)Any violation of this section by any person is a misdemeanor. Each offense shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), or imprisonment not to exceed one year in a county jail, or both the fine and imprisonment. The amount of any fines assessed shall be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund.
(f)The State Board of Equalization may provide information relative to a sellers failure or attempt to comply with the PACT Act and the Jenkins Act to the Attorney General.
(g)The Attorney General or a city attorney, county counsel, or district attorney may bring a civil action to enforce this section against a person that violates this section and, in addition to any other remedy provided by law, the court shall assess a civil penalty in accordance with the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) and not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation within a five-year period.
(3)A civil penalty of not less than four thousand dollars ($4,000) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not less than five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500) and not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for a fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(h)This section does not prohibit the lawful sale of a tobacco product that occurs by means of a vending machine.
(i)Nothing in this section shall relieve the seller of cigarettes from any other applicable requirement of state law relating to the sale or distribution of cigarettes or tobacco products in this state.
(j)The board shall enforce the licensing and tax provisions of this section. Other provisions of this section shall be enforced by the Attorney General.
(k)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 9.The Legislature finds and declares that Section 3 6 of this act, which adds Section 104559.1 to the Health and Safety Code, imposes a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the Attorney General, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Section 22980 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22980.(a)A peace officer or department employee granted limited peace officer status pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 830.11 of the Penal Code, upon presenting appropriate credentials, is authorized to enter any place as described in paragraph (2) or (3) and to conduct inspections in accordance with all of the following:
(1)Inspections shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
(2)Inspections may be at any place at which cigarettes or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored or at any site where evidence of activities involving evasion of cigarette or tobacco products tax and violations of Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code may be discovered.
(3)Inspections may be at any place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(4)Inspections shall be requested or conducted no more than once in a 24-hour period.
(b)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection shall be subject to the penalties imposed pursuant to Section 22981.
SEC. 3.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)(1)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
(A)Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B)Describes, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. Sec. 301 et seq.) has been sought and, if so, the status of any request for that authorization, approval, or order.
(C)Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(2)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand styles lack of characterizing flavor.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(3)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and documentation regarding packaging tobacco product status, packaging, or marketing of a brand style.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph and designated as nonpublic shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(f)(1)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(2)(A)The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination.
(B)Removal of a brand style from the UTL will be effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C)A manufacturer or importer may provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in paragraph (1) within 30 days of the notice provided pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(D)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a product brand style pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state.
(k)(1)Every manufacturer and importer submission under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) shall be accompanied by an initial application fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. The Attorney General shall collect an annual renewal fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of maintaining the UTL, to offset the costs associated with operating the UTL. The fee shall be for the fiscal year ending June 30 and shall not be prorated.
(2)Application and renewal fees received under this subdivision shall be deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of processing the submissions and operating the UTL.
(l)(1)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2)A manufacturer or importer may challenge a decision by the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1) in addition to providing additional materials to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision (f).
(m)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
(n)No person shall A person shall not affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes as described in Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 30161) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30101) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
(o)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(p)No distributor may A distributor shall not sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. For each tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor according to the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation.
(3)A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(q)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(r)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(s)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(t)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104495, 104559.5, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)Tobacco product flavor enhancer has the same meaning as defined in Section 104559.5.
(4)(5)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(u)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 4.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Nicotine means any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
(11)(12)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(12)(13)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(13)(14)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(14)(15)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(15)(16)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(16)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in paragraph (8) of subdivision (a) of Section 104495, as that provision may be amended from time to time.(17)(A)Tobacco product means any of the following:
(i)A product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, or snuff.
(ii)An electronic device that delivers nicotine or other vaporized liquids to the person inhaling from the device, including an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah.
(iii)Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not sold separately.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), tobacco product does not include: (i) a nicotine replacement product approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (ii) cannabis or a cannabis product, as those terms are defined in Section 26001 of the Business and Professions Code. Cannabis or a cannabis product that includes an ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine is a tobacco product under this section.
(17)(18)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(18)(19)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 5.Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30165.1.(a)The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this section:
(1)Department means the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
(2)Brand family means styles of cigarettes sold under the same trademark and differentiated from one another by means of additional modifiers, including, but not limited to, menthol, lights, kings, and 100s, and includes any brand name, alone or in conjunction with any other word, trademark, logo, symbol, motto, selling message, recognizable pattern of colors, or any other indicia of product identification identical or similar to, or identifiable with, a previously known brand of cigarettes.
(3)Brand style means any particular combination of trademark and modifiers within a brand family.
(4)Cigarette has the same meaning as in subdivision (d) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code and includes tobacco products defined as a cigarette under that subdivision.
(5)Directory means the California Tobacco Directory developed by the Attorney General and published on its internet website pursuant to subdivision (c).
(6)Distributor has the same meaning as in Section 30011.
(7)MSA means the Master Settlement Agreement, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(8)Nonparticipating manufacturer means any tobacco product manufacturer that is not a participating manufacturer.
(9)Participating manufacturer has the same meaning as in subsection II(jj) of the MSA.
(10)Qualified escrow fund has the same meaning as in subdivision (f) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(11)Tobacco product manufacturer has the same meaning as in subdivision (i) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(12)Units sold has the same meaning as in subdivision (j) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)Every tobacco product manufacturer whose cigarettes are sold in this state, whether directly or through a distributor, retailer, or similar intermediary or intermediaries, shall execute and deliver on a form and in the manner prescribed by the Attorney General, a certification to the Attorney General no later than April 30 of each year that, as of the date of the certification, the tobacco product manufacturer is either a participating manufacturer that has made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due under the Master Settlement Agreement, except to the extent the participating manufacturer is disputing any of the payments, or is a nonparticipating manufacturer in full compliance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including all installment payments required by that article and this section, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. A tobacco product manufacturer located outside of the United States shall provide to the Attorney General and keep current, the names, and addresses, including email addresses, of all importers that sell or will be selling their cigarettes in this state and shall cause each importer to provide to the Attorney General a copy of a valid importer permit issued by the United States Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, and the importer license issued by the department. The importers who sell or will be selling their cigarettes in this state shall obtain and maintain a license as an importer in compliance with Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code. Any person who makes a certification pursuant to this subdivision that asserts the truth of any material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment of up to one year in the county jail, or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both the imprisonment and the fine.
(1)A participating manufacturer shall include in its certification a complete list of its brand families and brand styles. The participating manufacturer shall update the list 30 days before any addition to or modification of its brand families and brand styles by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the Attorney General.
(2)A nonparticipating manufacturer shall include in its certification a complete list of all of its brand families and brand styles in accordance with all of the following requirements:
(A)Separately listing brand families and brand styles of cigarettes and the number of units sold for each brand family that were sold in the state during the preceding calendar year.
(B)Separately listing all of its brand families and brand styles that have been sold in the state at any time during the current calendar year.
(C)Indicating by an asterisk any brand family or brand style sold in the state during the preceding calendar year that is no longer being sold in the state as of the date of the certification.
(D)Identifying by name and address any other tobacco product manufacturer, including all previous fabricators or makers of the brand families, in a form, manner, and detail as required by the Attorney General. The tobacco product manufacturer shall update the list 30 days before any change in a fabricator for any brand family or any addition to or modification of its brand families by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the Attorney General.
(3)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the certification shall further certify all of the following:
(A)That the nonparticipating manufacturer is registered to do business in the state, or has appointed a resident agent for service of process and provided notice thereof as required by subdivision (f).
(B)That the nonparticipating manufacturer has done all of the following:
(i)Established and continues to maintain a qualified escrow fund as that term is defined in subdivision (f) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code and implementing regulations.
(ii)Executed a qualified escrow agreement that has been reviewed and approved by the Attorney General and that governs the qualified escrow fund.
(iii)The certifying nonparticipating manufacturer fabricates all of the brand families of the cigarettes it seeks to certify.
(C)That the nonparticipating manufacturer is in full compliance with both of the following:
(i)Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, this section, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(ii)Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall also provide a copy of a valid, corresponding federal permit issued by the United States Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.
(D)That the nonparticipating manufacturer has provided all of the following:
(i)The name, address, and telephone number of the financial institution where the nonparticipating manufacturer has established the qualified escrow fund required pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and all regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(ii)The account number of the qualified escrow fund and subaccount number for the State of California.
(iii)The amount the nonparticipating manufacturer placed in the qualified escrow fund for cigarettes sold in the state during the preceding calendar year, the date and amount of each deposit, and any confirming evidence or verification as may be deemed necessary by the Attorney General.
(iv)The amounts and dates of any withdrawal or transfer of funds the nonparticipating manufacturer made at any time from the qualified escrow fund or from any other qualified escrow fund into which it ever made escrow payments pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and all regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(E)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer located outside the United States, that the manufacturer has provided a declaration in a form prescribed by the Attorney General from each of its importers into the United States of any of its brand families to be sold in the state, that the importer accepts joint and several liability with the nonparticipating manufacturer for all escrow deposits due and all penalties assessed in accordance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and for payment of all fees, costs, attorneys fees, penalties, and refunds imposed or required under this section, including, but not limited to, all refunds resulting from the removal of the nonparticipating manufacturer or any of its brand families or brand styles from the Directory. The declaration shall appoint for the declarant a resident agent for service of process in California in accordance with subdivision (f) and affirm that the declarant has caused every importer that will sell its cigarettes in this state to obtain and maintain a license as an importer pursuant to Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code.
(4)(A)A tobacco product manufacturer may not include a brand family in its certification unless either of the following is true:
(i)In the case of a participating manufacturer, the participating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of calculating its payments under the MSA for the relevant year, in the volume and shares determined pursuant to the MSA.
(ii)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(B)Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the states right to maintain that a brand family constitutes cigarettes of a different tobacco product manufacturer for purposes of calculating payments under the MSA or for purposes of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(5)A tobacco product manufacturer shall maintain all invoices and documentation of sales and other information relied upon for the certification for a period of five years, unless otherwise required by law to maintain them for a longer period of time.
(c)The Attorney General shall develop and publish on its internet website the California Tobacco Directory, which shall list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with this section and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(1)The Attorney General may not include or retain in the Directory the name, brand families, or brand styles of any of the following:
(A)Any participating manufacturer that fails to provide the required certification or to make a payment calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA except to the extent that it is disputing the payment.
(B)Any nonparticipating manufacturer that fails to provide the required certification or whose certification the Attorney General determines is not in compliance with subdivision (b), unless the Attorney General has determined that the violation has been cured to the satisfaction of the Attorney General.
(C)A tobacco product manufacturer that does not hold a valid and current manufacturers license under Section 22979 of the Business and Professions Code, including, but not limited to, a manufacturer whose license has been revoked under subdivision (g) of Section 22979 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)A tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style shall not be included or retained in the Directory if the Attorney General concludes that any of the following is true:
(A)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, any escrow deposit required pursuant to Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code for any period for any brand family, whether or not listed by the nonparticipating manufacturer, has not been fully deposited into a qualified escrow fund governed by a qualified escrow agreement that has been approved by the Attorney General.
(B)Any outstanding final judgment, including interest thereon, for violations of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, this section, Sections 30101.7 and 30165.2, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those sections, has not been fully satisfied for the brand family and the tobacco product manufacturer.
(C)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer by reason of the business plan, business history, trade connections, or compliance and payment history in the state or any other state of any of the principals thereof, the nonparticipating manufacturer fails to provide reasonable assurance that it will comply with the requirements of this section, Section 30165.2, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code. As used in this section, reasonable assurance may include information and documentation establishing to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that a failure to pay in California or elsewhere was the result of a good faith dispute over the payment obligation.
(D)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturer has knowingly failed to disclose any material information required or knowingly made any material false statements in the certification of any supporting information or documentation provided.
(E)If the tobacco product manufacturer or its importer, as defined in Section 30019, engages in delivery sales and the tobacco product manufacturer fails to provide or fails to cause its importer to provide reasonable assurances that the delivery seller has fully complied with all requirements of applicable federal and state law, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(i)Chapter 10A (commencing with Section 375) of Title 15 of the United States Code.
(ii)The requirements of Section 30101.7.
(iii)All stamping, marking, and labeling requirements, including, but not limited to, Section 30163, and any other information or indicia requirements imposed by state or federal law.
(iv)All other state laws generally applicable to the sale and distribution of tobacco products.
(3)The Attorney General may not include or retain in the Directory any brand style that has not been tested and marked in compliance with the California Cigarette Fire Safety and Firefighter Protection Act (Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code).
(4)All listings on the Directory shall expire on April 29 of each year. Beginning with the 2023 calendar year, a tobacco product manufacturer shall renew its listing on the Directory by providing the annual certification in compliance with this section and remitting an annual fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per tobacco product manufacturer payable to the office of the Attorney General. Any fees received pursuant to this paragraph shall be deposited into the California Tobacco Directory Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited in the California Tobacco Directory Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of administering the Directory. The Attorney General may retain a listing for a tobacco product manufacturer on the Directory while the renewal for the certification is pending, provided that if the Attorney General decides not to retain a listing of any manufacturer or brand family while the renewal of the certification is pending, the Attorney General shall comply with the delisting provisions in this section, including paragraph (5).
(5)The Attorney General shall update the Directory as necessary in order to correct mistakes and to add or remove a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style to keep the Directory in conformity with the requirements of this section, Section 30165.2, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and the California Cigarette Fire Safety and Firefighter Protection Act (Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code). The Attorney General shall promptly provide distributors and wholesalers with written notice of each tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, and brand style that the Attorney General has added to, or excluded or removed from, the Directory.
(A)When the Attorney Generals office informs a manufacturer that it will recommend to the Attorney General that the manufacturer or brand family be delisted for cause, the office shall transmit by email, or other practicable means, a copy of the notice of the pending administrative action to the manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and to any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose.
(B)A licensed distributor may purchase, stamp, or sell, and a licensed wholesaler may purchase or sell, products affected by the notice of pending administrative action for no more than 40 days following issuance of the notice of pending administrative action. Before the sale of a product affected by the notice of pending administrative action, and no later than seven days after the notice of pending administrative action, a distributor or wholesaler shall notify each of its existing customers of the pending administrative action.
(C)Upon removal from the Directory of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style, the Attorney General shall transmit by email, or other practicable means, a notice of removal, to the manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and to any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose. No later than seven days after issuance of the notice of removal, a distributor or wholesaler shall provide each of its existing customers a copy of the notice of removal.
(D)Notwithstanding subdivision (e), a licensed retailer may possess, transport, and sell the tax-stamped cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style affected by the notice of removal for no more than 60 days following the effective date of the tobacco product manufacturers brand familys or brand styles removal from the Directory.
(E)After 60 days following removal from the Directory, the cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style identified in the notice of removal are contraband and are subject to seizure and destruction under subdivision (e) of Section 30436 and subdivision (b) of Section 30449, and may not be purchased or sold in the state. This section does not limit or otherwise change the seizure and destruction process of cigarettes under Sections 14950 to 14959, inclusive, of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, Section 14956 of the Health and Safety Code.
(F)If the Attorney General declines to remove a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style from the Directory following issuance of the notice of pending administrative action described in subparagraph (A), the Attorney General shall notify by email, or other practicable means, the tobacco product manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose, of the decision not to pursue administrative action. No later than seven days after issuance of this notice, a distributor or wholesaler shall provide each of its existing customers a copy of this notice, and the purchase, stamping, and sales restrictions imposed by subparagraph (B) shall have no further effect.
(G)Upon request of the Attorney General, the department shall provide the Attorney General all email addresses for licensed distributors, wholesalers, and retailers in the departments possession.
(6)Newly qualified and elevated-risk nonparticipating manufacturers shall file with the Attorney General a surety bond in a form and manner directed by the Attorney General.
(A)Notwithstanding any other law, if a newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturer is to be listed in the Directory or if the Attorney General reasonably determines that any nonparticipating manufacturer who has filed a certification pursuant to subdivision (b) poses an elevated risk for noncompliance with this section, Section 30165.2, Part 13 (commencing with Section 30001) of Division 2, or with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, neither the nonparticipating manufacturer nor any of its brand families shall be included in the Directory unless and until the nonparticipating manufacturer, or its United States importer that undertakes joint and several liability for the nonparticipating manufacturers performance in accordance with subparagraph (E) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), has posted a bond in accordance with this section.
(B)The bonds shall be posted by a corporate surety located within the United States in an amount equal to the greater of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or the amount of escrow the nonparticipating manufacturer in either its current or predecessor form was required to deposit as a result of the largest of its most recent five calendar years sales in California. The bond shall be written in favor of the State of California and shall be conditioned on the performance by the nonparticipating manufacturer, or its importer that undertakes joint and several liability for the nonparticipating manufacturers performance in accordance with subparagraph (E) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), of all its duties and obligations under this section and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and payment of all state taxes for the sale or distribution of cigarettes and tobacco products in this state during the year in which the certification is filed and the next succeeding calendar year. The bond may be drawn upon by the department or the Attorney General to cover unsatisfied escrow obligations, tax obligations, claims for penalties, claims for monetary damages, and any other liabilities that are subject to a claim of sovereign immunity against enforcement of the laws specified above.
(C)A nonparticipating manufacturer may be deemed to pose an elevated risk for noncompliance with this section, Section 30165.2, or Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code if any of the following apply:
(i)The nonparticipating manufacturer or any affiliate thereof has failed to deposit fully the amount due on an escrow obligation with respect to any state at any time during the current calendar year or within the past three calendar years unless either of the following occur:
(I)The nonparticipating manufacturer did not underdeposit knowingly or recklessly and the manufacturer promptly cured the underdeposit within 180 days of notice of it.
(II)The underdeposit or lack of deposit is the subject of a good faith dispute as documented to the satisfaction of the Attorney General and the underdeposit or lack of deposit is cured within 180 days of entry of a final order establishing the amount of the required escrow deposit.
(ii)Any state has removed the nonparticipating manufacturer or its brand families or an affiliate or any of the affiliates brand families from the states tobacco Directory for noncompliance with a state escrow deposit or tobacco tax law at any time during the calendar year or within the past three calendar years.
(iii)Any state has litigation pending against, or an unsatisfied final judgment against, the nonparticipating manufacturer or any affiliate thereof for escrow or for penalties, fees, costs, refunds, or attorneys fees related to noncompliance with state escrow laws.
(iv)The nonparticipating manufacturer sells its cigarettes or tobacco products directly to consumers via remote or other non-face-to-face means.
(v)A state or federal court has determined that the nonparticipating manufacturer has violated any tobacco tax or tobacco control law or engaged in unfair business practice or unfair competition.
(vi)Any state has suspended or revoked the nonparticipating manufacturers license to engage in any aspect of tobacco business.
(vii)Any state or federal court has determined that the nonparticipating manufacturer failed to comply with state or federal law imposing marking, labeling, and stamping requirements or requiring information to be affixed to, or contained in, the labels, markings, or packaging.
(viii)During any of the past three years, escrow and equity fee payments were made on less than 80 percent of the nonparticipating manufacturers nationwide cigarette sales as measured by excise taxes collected by the federal government and, in the case of Puerto Rico, arbitrios de cigarrillos collected by the Puerto Rico taxing authority.
(ix)As of January 1, 2023, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in or into the state by distributors that have not reported their last 12 months of in-state sales electronically and in the manner prescribed by both the department and the Attorney General.
(x)For a domestic manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in the state through one or more distributors that do not purchase directly from the nonparticipating manufacturer. For a foreign manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in the state through one or more distributors that do not purchase directly from an importer that has accepted joint and several liability pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (f).
(xi)The nonparticipating manufacturer fails to submit or complete any required forms, documents, certification, or notices, in a timely manner or, to the satisfaction of the Attorney General or the department.
(D)As used in this paragraph, newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturer means a nonparticipating manufacturer that has not previously been listed in the Directory during the last 12 months. These newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturers may be required to post a bond in accordance with this section for the next three years of their listing, or longer if they have been determined to pose an elevated risk for noncompliance.
(7)The Attorney General shall provide each tobacco product manufacturer that has provided all certifications and other information required by this section with a written acknowledgment of receipt within seven business days after receiving the certifications and other materials. Each tobacco product manufacturer shall provide to each distributor to whom it sells or ships cigarettes a copy of each acknowledgment of receipt provided to the tobacco product manufacturer by the Attorney General. Upon request, the Attorney General shall provide any distributor with a copy of the most recent written acknowledgment of receipt provided to the tobacco product manufacturer.
(8)The Attorney General shall not include or retain in the directory any brand style that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)(1)The Attorney General may exclude or remove from the Directory a tobacco product manufacturer or any of its brand families, based on a determination that the manufacturer is not a participating manufacturer that has provided the required certification and made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA, except to the extent that it is disputing the payment, or in the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, has not made all escrow payments required by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, in accordance with that subdivision, or has not complied with this section or Section 30165.2, or the tobacco product manufacturer has not complied with any state or federal delivery sales laws applicable to sales and distribution of tobacco products in this state. Before the exclusion or removal may take effect, the Attorney General shall notify the tobacco product manufacturer of this determination.
(2)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1), the tobacco product manufacturer may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, and may seek relief from the determination, by filing a petition for writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure for that purpose in the Superior Court for the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination, if the participating manufacturer has made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA, except to the extent that it is disputing payment, or if a nonparticipating manufacturer has paid into escrow the full amount of any deficiency in the escrow payments that the Attorney General has determined the nonparticipating manufacturer was required to have made under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, including any installment payments required under subdivision (h), pending final resolution of the action.
(e)(1)No A person shall not affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 30163, or pay the tax levied pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2 on a tobacco product defined as a cigarette under this section, unless the brand family and brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco product, and the tobacco product manufacturer that makes or sells the cigarettes, are included on the Directory.
(2)No A person shall not sell, offer, or possess for sale in this state, ship or otherwise distribute into or within this state or import for personal consumption in this state, cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style not included in the Directory.
(3)No A person shall not do either of the following:
(A)Sell or distribute cigarettes that the person knows or should know are intended to be distributed in violation of paragraphs (1) and (2).
(B)Acquire, hold, own, possess, transport, import, or cause to be imported cigarettes that the person knows or should know are intended to be distributed in violation of paragraphs (1) and (2).
(f)(1)A nonresident or foreign nonparticipating manufacturer that has not registered to do business in the state as a foreign corporation or business entity shall, as a condition precedent to having its brand families or brand styles listed or retained in the Directory, appoint and continually engage without interruption the services of an agent in this state to act as agent for the service of process on whom all process, and any action or proceeding against the nonresident or foreign nonparticipating manufacturer concerning or arising out of the enforcement of this section, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, may be served in any manner authorized by law. This service shall constitute legal and valid service of process on the nonparticipating manufacturer. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide the name, address, telephone number, and proof of the appointment and availability of the agent to the satisfaction of the Attorney General. A nonparticipating manufacturer located outside of the United States shall, as an additional condition precedent to having its brand families listed or retained in the Directory, cause each of its importers into the United States of any of its brand families to be sold in the state to appoint and continually engage without interruption the services of an agent in the state in accordance with this section. All obligations of a nonparticipating manufacturer imposed by this section with respect to appointment of its agent shall likewise apply to importers with respect to appointment of their agents.
(2)The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide notice to the Attorney General 30 calendar days before termination of the authority of an agent and shall further provide proof to the satisfaction of the Attorney General of the appointment of a new agent no less than five calendar days before the termination of an existing agent appointment. In the event an agent terminates an agency appointment, the nonparticipating manufacturer shall notify the Attorney General of said termination within five calendar days and shall include proof to the satisfaction of the Attorney General of the appointment of a new agent.
(3)(A)A nonparticipating manufacturer whose products are sold in this state without appointing or designating an agent as herein required shall be deemed to have appointed the Secretary of State as its agent. The appointment of the Secretary of State as the agent for service of process pursuant to this provision does not satisfy the condition precedent specified in paragraph (1) to having its brand families listed or retained in the Directory.
(B)The Attorney General or their authorized representative may proceed against a nonparticipating manufacturer in the courts of this state pursuant to subparagraph (A) by service of process upon the Secretary of State. The service may be made by delivering by hand to the Secretary of State or their authorized representative one copy of the process for each defendant to be served, together with a declaration stating that service is being made upon the Secretary of State pursuant to subparagraph (A), setting forth the last known address of the nonparticipating manufacturer, and signed by the party to the action seeking service.
(C)Upon receipt of the records described in subparagraph (B), the Secretary of State or their authorized representative shall give notice of the service of process to any nonparticipating manufacturer served by forwarding a copy of the process to the nonparticipating manufacturer at the last known address identified in the declaration.
(4)For each nonparticipating manufacturer located outside the United States, each importer into the United States of any nonparticipating manufacturers brand families that are sold in the state shall bear joint and several liability with the nonparticipating manufacturer for deposit of all escrow due under, and payment of all costs and attorneys fees imposed in accordance with, Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, and payment of all fees, costs, attorneys fees, penalties, and refunds imposed or required by this section or Section 30165.2. Each tobacco product manufacturer and importer, that sells or intends to sell cigarettes in California, shall obtain and maintain a license as a manufacturer or importer in compliance with Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code. Each nonparticipating manufacturer and its importers shall report in the manner, including electronically, as required by the Attorney General, all cigarettes sold in this state each month, including, but not limited to, the quantity, including tobacco weight and number of cigarettes, the wholesale cost, and sale price of each brand family and brand style. Any tobacco product manufacturer or importer that fails to file the report as required by the Attorney General shall be liable for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of either of the following:
(A)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes that were not reported as required by the Attorney General.
(B)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(g)(1)Not later than 25 days after the end of each calendar quarter, and more frequently if directed by the department or the Attorney General, each distributor shall submit any information as the department or Attorney General requires to facilitate compliance with this section, including, but not limited to, a list by brand family of the total number of cigarettes or, in the case of roll your own, the total ounces for which the distributor affixed stamps during the previous calendar month or otherwise paid the tax due. The distributor shall maintain, and shall make available to the department and the Attorney General, all invoices and documentation of sales of all nonparticipating manufacturer cigarettes and any other information relied upon in reporting to the department and the Attorney General for a period of five years.
(2)(A)Notwithstanding Section 30455, the department shall disclose to the Attorney General any information received under this part for purposes of determining compliance with and enforcing the provisions of this section, Sections 30101.7 and 30165.2, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. The department and Attorney General may share the information received under this section with any of the following:
(i)Other federal, state, or local agencies for purposes of enforcing this section, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, or corresponding laws of other states or the United States.
(ii)A court arbitrator, or data clearinghouse or similar entity for purposes of resolving disputes arising under, and making calculations and determinations required by, the MSA or related settlement agreements and with counsel for the parties or expert witnesses in any such proceeding, provided that the recipients agree to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information.
(B)The department and Attorney General shall not publicly disclose confidential information except as necessary to carry out their functions and duties.
(3)At any time, the Attorney General may require from the nonparticipating manufacturer proof from the financial institution in which the manufacturer has established a qualified escrow fund for the purpose of compliance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, of the amount of money in the fund being held on behalf of the state and the dates of deposits, and listing the amounts of all withdrawals from the fund and the dates thereof.
(4)In addition to the information required to be submitted pursuant to this section or Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, the Attorney General may require a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, importer, or tobacco product manufacturer to submit any additional information, including, but not limited to, samples of the packaging or labeling of each brand family, as is necessary to enable the Attorney General to determine whether a tobacco product manufacturer or importer has complied, is in compliance, and, if applicable pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), has provided reasonable assurance that it will comply or continue to comply with this section, Section 30165.2, Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(h)To promote compliance with this section, the Attorney General may promulgate regulations requiring a tobacco product manufacturer subject to the requirements of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 to make the escrow deposits required in quarterly or other specified installments during the year in which the sales covered by the deposits are made. The Attorney General may require production of information sufficient to enable the Attorney General to determine the adequacy of the amount of the installment deposit.
(i)(1)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, upon a finding that a distributor licensed by the department has violated subdivision (e), or paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), the department may take the following actions:
(A)In the case of the first offense, the department may revoke or suspend the license or licenses issued to the distributor by the department, pursuant to the procedures applicable to the revocation of a license set forth in Sections 30148 and 30158, and Section 22980.3 of the Business and Professions Code. Each stamp affixed and each sale or offer to sell cigarettes in violation of subdivision (e) shall constitute a separate violation.
(B)In the case of a second or any subsequent offense that the department determines to be a violation of subdivision (e), in addition to the action authorized under subparagraph (A), the department may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of either of the following:
(i)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes.
(ii)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(2)(A)A distributor licensed by the department in any action for a violation of subdivision (e) shall have a defense provided that either of the following is true:
(i)At the time of the violation, the cigarettes or tobacco products claimed to be the subject of the alleged violation belonged to a brand family and brand style that was included on the Directory.
(ii)At the time of the violation, the distributor possessed a copy of the Attorney Generals most recent written acknowledgment of receipt of the certifications and other information required as a condition of including the brand family and brand style on the Directory.
(B)The defense described in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) is not available to a distributor if, at the time of the violation, the Attorney General had provided the distributor with written notice that the brand family or brand style had been excluded or removed from the Directory, or the distributor failed to provide the Attorney General with a current address for the receipt of written notice through email as required by paragraph (4) of subdivision (c).
(3)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, the Attorney General may bring a civil action on behalf of the state for civil penalties and injunctive relief against a retailer, distributor, wholesaler, manufacturer, importer, or other person that violates subdivision (e), or paragraph (1) or (4) of subdivision (g). The court, upon a finding of a violation, shall impose a civil penalty to be paid to the General Fund. The amount of the civil penalty may not exceed the greater of either of the following:
(A)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes.
(B)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(4)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, the Attorney General may bring a civil action on behalf of the state for civil penalties and injunctive relief against any nonparticipating manufacturer that does not submit timely, complete, and accurate certifications to the Attorney General under this section and subdivision (c) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code regarding its sales of cigarettes in this state, whether directly or through a distributor, retailers, or similar intermediary or intermediaries, and tobacco escrow account compliance for its ongoing and previous sales in this state. The court, upon a finding of a violation, may do both of the following:
(A)Impose a civil penalty to be paid to the General Fund not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day the nonparticipating manufacturer fails to timely, completely, and accurately certify to the Attorney General.
(B)Issue an injunction prohibiting the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes from being sold in or into the state until the failure to certify has been fully cured.
(5)A violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (e) shall constitute a misdemeanor.
(j)If a distributor affixes a stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes under subdivision (a) of Section 30163, or pays the tax levied under Sections 30123 and 30131.2 on a tobacco product defined as a cigarette under this section, during the period between the date on which the brand family of the cigarettes or tobacco product was excluded or removed from the Directory and the date on which the distributor received notice of the exclusion or removal under paragraph (4) of subdivision (c), then both of the following shall apply:
(1)The distributor shall be entitled to a credit for the tax paid by the distributor with respect to the cigarette or tobacco product to which the stamp or meter impression was affixed, or the tax paid during that period. The distributor shall comply with regulations prescribed by the department regarding refunds and credits that are adopted pursuant to Section 30177.5. If the distributor has sold the cigarette or tobacco product to a wholesaler or retailer, and has received payment from the wholesaler or retailer, the distributor shall provide the credit to the wholesaler or retailer.
(2)The brand family may not be included on or restored to the Directory until the tobacco product manufacturer has reimbursed the distributor for the cost to the distributor of the cigarettes or tobacco product to which the stamp or meter impression was affixed, or the tax paid, during that period.
(k)Any tobacco product manufacturer that falsely represents any of the following to any person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for each false representation:
(1)Any information required under subdivision (b).
(2)That the tobacco product manufacturer is a participating manufacturer.
(3)That the tobacco product manufacturer or any other person has made any or all escrow payments required by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, if applicable to the manufacturer.
(4)That it has complied with subdivision (b), or with paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), if applicable to the tobacco product manufacturer.
(l)A violation of subdivision (e) shall constitute unfair competition under Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code.
(m)No A person shall not be issued a distributors license pursuant to Section 30140 unless that person has certified in writing that the person will comply fully with this section. Any person who makes a certification pursuant to this subdivision that asserts the truth of any material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment of up to one year in the county jail, or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both the imprisonment and the fine.
(n)The Attorney General may adopt rules and regulations to implement this section. The rules and regulations may establish procedures for including in the Directory tobacco product manufacturers that are not participating manufacturers and were not required to make escrow payments under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, for sales made during any preceding calendar year, and brand families of those tobacco product manufacturers. The rules and regulations may also establish procedures for seizure and destruction of cigarettes forfeited to the state pursuant to Section 30436 or Section 30449, including, but not limited to, the state facilities that may be used for the destruction of contraband cigarettes. Nothing in this section shall affect the authority of local law enforcement and local government officials to seize and destroy contraband under existing state or local law. The regulations adopted to effect the purposes of this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. For purposes of that chapter, including Section 11349.6 of the Government Code, the adoption of the regulations shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and general welfare. Notwithstanding subdivision (e) of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code, the regulations shall be repealed 180 days after their effective date, unless the adopting authority or agency complies with that chapter, as provided in subdivision (e) of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code.
(o)In any action brought by the state to enforce this section, the state shall be entitled to recover the costs of investigation, expert witness fees, costs of the action, and reasonable attorneys fees.
(p)The Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative shall have the authority to:
(1)Conduct audits and investigations of the following:
(A)A nonparticipating manufacturer and its importers.
(B)Distributors, retailers, and wholesalers, as defined in Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Profession Code, and this part.
(C)Persons or entities engaged in delivery sales as defined in Section 30101.7.
(2)Upon reasonable cause to believe that a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, issue subpoenas, compel the attendance of witnesses, administer oaths, certify to official acts, take depositions within and without the state, as now provided by law, and compel the production of pertinent books, payrolls, accounts, papers, records, documents, and testimony relevant to investigations. If a person refuses, without good cause, to be examined or to answer a legal and pertinent question, or to produce a document or other evidence when ordered to do so by the Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative, the Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative may apply to the superior court of the county where the person is in attendance or located, upon affidavit, for an order returnable in no less than two nor more than five days, directing the person to show cause why the person should not be examined, answer a legal or pertinent question, or produce a document, record, or other evidence. Upon the hearing, if the court determines that the person, without good cause, has refused to be examined, answer legal or pertinent questions, or produce a document, record, or other evidence, the court may order compliance with the subpoena and assess all costs and reasonable attorneys fees against the person. If the motion for an order is granted and the person thereafter fails to comply with the order, the court may make orders as are provided for by law. Subpoenas shall be served and witness fees and mileage paid as allowed in civil cases in the courts of the State of California.
(q)In any action regarding a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, or of Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code, reports submitted to the department pursuant to Section 30182 or Section 22978.1, 22978.4, or 22978.5 of the Business and Professions Code, shall be admissible in evidence and shall be presumed to accurately state the number of cigarettes stamped during the time period by the stamping agent that submitted the report absent a contrary showing by the nonparticipating manufacturer or importer. Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the right of the state to maintain that reports are incorrect or do not accurately reflect a nonparticipating manufacturers sales in the state during the time period in question, and the presumption shall not apply in the event the state does so maintain.
(r)In any action regarding a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, or of Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code, sufficient notice of the action to the alleged violator shall be given by complaint written in the English language. The state shall not be required to bear any expense of translating the complaint into another language.
(s)Unless otherwise expressly provided, the remedies or penalties provided by this section are cumulative to each other and to the remedies or penalties available under all other laws of this state.
SEC. 6.Section 30435 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30435.(a)An employee of the department, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, is authorized to enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place described in subdivision (b) or (c).
(b)Any building, facility, site, or place at which cigarette or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored, or any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed under this part, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the Master Settlement Agreement, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, Section 30165.1.
(c)Any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(d)Any inspection performed under the authority of this section shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at a reasonable time, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the building, facility, site, or place that is inspected.
(e)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection authorized under this section is subject to the penalty imposed by Section 30471.
SEC. 7.Section 30436 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30436.The following property, upon seizure by the department, is hereby forfeited to the state:
(a)Cigarettes or tobacco products transported upon the highways, roads, or streets of this state in violation of Section 30431 or Section 30432.
(b)Cigarettes not contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamp or meter impressions or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid, which are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent of the person to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products without payment of the taxes imposed by this part.
(c)Any cigarette or tobacco product vending machine, together with the cigarettes, tobacco products, money, or other contents thereof, that has been loaded, in whole or in part, with packages of cigarettes that do not have California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions affixed or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid.
(d)Cigarettes contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions in violation of Section 30163.
(e)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2, in violation of Section 30165.1, regardless of whether the violation is subject to the defense described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 30165.1.
(f)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code.
SEC. 8.Section 30449 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30449.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (b), any property, except money, forfeited to the state under this chapter shall be sold by the department at public auction. Notice of the sale shall be given by posting a written notice of the time and place of sale in three public places in the county where the property is to be sold for not less than five days nor more than 10 days before the sale. If the department is unable to sell any property forfeited to the state under this part or, if the department determines that the property is unsalable, it may destroy that property.
(b)(1)Any property forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(2)Any cigarettes forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(3)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(4)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code shall be destroyed.
(c)(1)A record shall be kept of all property destroyed pursuant to this section showing the nature of the property, the quantity, the reason for, and the cost and manner of destruction.
(2)The person from whom the property was seized shall be liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this section.
(3)The proceeds of the sale and any money forfeited to the state shall be deposited in the General Fund.
SEC. 9.The Legislature finds and declares that Section 3 of this act, which adds Section 104559.1 to the Health and Safety Code, imposes a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the Attorney General, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Section 22980 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22980.(a)A peace officer or department employee granted limited peace officer status pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 830.11 of the Penal Code, upon presenting appropriate credentials, is authorized to enter any place as described in paragraph (2) or (3) and to conduct inspections in accordance with all of the following:
(1)Inspections shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
(2)Inspections may be at any place at which cigarettes or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored or at any site where evidence of activities involving evasion of cigarette or tobacco products tax and violations of Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code may be discovered.
(3)Inspections may be at any place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(4)Inspections shall be requested or conducted no more than once in a 24-hour period.
(b)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection shall be subject to the penalties imposed pursuant to Section 22981.
SEC. 3.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)(1)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
(A)Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B)Certifies that each brand style is not adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c Describes, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C., U.S.C. Sec. 301 et seq.). seq.) has been sought and, if so, the status of any request for that authorization, approval, or order.
(C)Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(2)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand styles lack of characterizing flavor.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(3)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph and designated as nonpublic shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(f)(1)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(2)(A)The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination.
(B)Removal of a brand style from the UTL will be effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C)A manufacturer or importer may provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in paragraph (1) within 30 days of the notice provided pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(D)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state.
(k)(1)Every manufacturer and importer submission under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) shall be accompanied by an initial application fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. The Attorney General shall collect an annual renewal fee of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of maintaining the UTL, to offset the costs associated with operating the UTL. The fee shall be for the fiscal year ending June 30 and shall not be prorated.
(2)Application and renewal fees received under this subdivision shall be deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited into the California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of processing the submissions and operating the UTL.
(k)(l)(1)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2)A manufacturer or importer may challenge a decision by the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1) in addition to providing additional materials to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision (f).
(l )(m)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
(m)(n)No person shall affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes as described in Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 30161) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30101) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
(n)(o)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(o)(p)No distributor may sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. For each tobacco product sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor according to the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation.
(3)A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(p)(q)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(q)(r)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating characterizing flavor determinations, requiring a fee for manufacturer and importer certifications, determinations and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(r)(s)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(s)(t)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104495, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(t)(u)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 4.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(12)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(13)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(14)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(15)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(16)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in paragraph (8) of subdivision (a) of Section 104495, as that provision may be amended from time to time.
(17)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(18)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 5.Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30165.1.(a)The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this section:
(1)Department means the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
(2)Brand family means styles of cigarettes sold under the same trademark and differentiated from one another by means of additional modifiers, including, but not limited to, menthol, lights, kings, and 100s, and includes any brand name, alone or in conjunction with any other word, trademark, logo, symbol, motto, selling message, recognizable pattern of colors, or any other indicia of product identification identical or similar to, or identifiable with, a previously known brand of cigarettes.
(3)Brand style means any particular combination of trademark and modifiers within a brand family.
(4)Cigarette has the same meaning as in subdivision (d) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code and includes tobacco products defined as a cigarette under that subdivision.
(5)Directory means the California Tobacco Directory developed by the Attorney General and published on its internet website pursuant to subdivision (c).
(6)Distributor has the same meaning as in Section 30011.
(7)MSA means the Master Settlement Agreement, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(8)Nonparticipating manufacturer means any tobacco product manufacturer that is not a participating manufacturer.
(9)Participating manufacturer has the same meaning as in subsection II(jj) of the MSA.
(10)Qualified escrow fund has the same meaning as in subdivision (f) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(11)Tobacco product manufacturer has the same meaning as in subdivision (i) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(12)Units sold has the same meaning as in subdivision (j) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)Every tobacco product manufacturer whose cigarettes are sold in this state, whether directly or through a distributor, retailer, or similar intermediary or intermediaries, shall execute and deliver on a form and in the manner prescribed by the Attorney General, a certification to the Attorney General no later than April 30 of each year that, as of the date of the certification, the tobacco product manufacturer is either a participating manufacturer that has made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due under the Master Settlement Agreement, except to the extent the participating manufacturer is disputing any of the payments, or is a nonparticipating manufacturer in full compliance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including all installment payments required by that article and this section, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. A tobacco product manufacturer located outside of the United States shall provide to the Attorney General and keep current, the names, and addresses, including email addresses, of all importers that sell or will be selling their cigarettes in this state and shall cause each importer to provide to the Attorney General a copy of a valid importer permit issued by the United States Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, and the importer license issued by the department. The importers who sell or will be selling their cigarettes in this state shall obtain and maintain a license as an importer in compliance with Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code. Any person who makes a certification pursuant to this subdivision that asserts the truth of any material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment of up to one year in the county jail, or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both the imprisonment and the fine.
(1)A participating manufacturer shall include in its certification a complete list of its brand families and brand styles. The participating manufacturer shall update the list 30 days before any addition to or modification of its brand families and brand styles by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the Attorney General.
(2)A nonparticipating manufacturer shall include in its certification a complete list of all of its brand families and brand styles in accordance with all of the following requirements:
(A)Separately listing brand families and brand styles of cigarettes and the number of units sold for each brand family that were sold in the state during the preceding calendar year.
(B)Separately listing all of its brand families and brand styles that have been sold in the state at any time during the current calendar year.
(C)Indicating by an asterisk any brand family or brand style sold in the state during the preceding calendar year that is no longer being sold in the state as of the date of the certification.
(D)Identifying by name and address any other tobacco product manufacturer, including all previous fabricators or makers of the brand families, in a form, manner, and detail as required by the Attorney General. The tobacco product manufacturer shall update the list 30 days before any change in a fabricator for any brand family or any addition to or modification of its brand families by executing and delivering a supplemental certification to the Attorney General.
(3)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the certification shall further certify all of the following:
(A)That the nonparticipating manufacturer is registered to do business in the state, or has appointed a resident agent for service of process and provided notice thereof as required by subdivision (f).
(B)That the nonparticipating manufacturer has done all of the following:
(i)Established and continues to maintain a qualified escrow fund as that term is defined in subdivision (f) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code and implementing regulations.
(ii)Executed a qualified escrow agreement that has been reviewed and approved by the Attorney General and that governs the qualified escrow fund.
(iii)The certifying nonparticipating manufacturer fabricates all of the brand families of the cigarettes it seeks to certify.
(C)That the nonparticipating manufacturer is in full compliance with both of the following:
(i)Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, this section, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(ii)Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall also provide a copy of a valid, corresponding federal permit issued by the United States Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.
(D)That the nonparticipating manufacturer has provided all of the following:
(i)The name, address, and telephone number of the financial institution where the nonparticipating manufacturer has established the qualified escrow fund required pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and all regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(ii)The account number of the qualified escrow fund and subaccount number for the State of California.
(iii)The amount the nonparticipating manufacturer placed in the qualified escrow fund for cigarettes sold in the state during the preceding calendar year, the date and amount of each deposit, and any confirming evidence or verification as may be deemed necessary by the Attorney General.
(iv)The amounts and dates of any withdrawal or transfer of funds the nonparticipating manufacturer made at any time from the qualified escrow fund or from any other qualified escrow fund into which it ever made escrow payments pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and all regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(E)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer located outside the United States, that the manufacturer has provided a declaration in a form prescribed by the Attorney General from each of its importers into the United States of any of its brand families to be sold in the state, that the importer accepts joint and several liability with the nonparticipating manufacturer for all escrow deposits due and all penalties assessed in accordance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and for payment of all fees, costs, attorneys fees, penalties, and refunds imposed or required under this section, including, but not limited to, all refunds resulting from the removal of the nonparticipating manufacturer or any of its brand families or brand styles from the Directory. The declaration shall appoint for the declarant a resident agent for service of process in California in accordance with subdivision (f) and affirm that the declarant has caused every importer that will sell its cigarettes in this state to obtain and maintain a license as an importer pursuant to Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code.
(4)(A)A tobacco product manufacturer may not include a brand family in its certification unless either of the following is true:
(i)In the case of a participating manufacturer, the participating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of calculating its payments under the MSA for the relevant year, in the volume and shares determined pursuant to the MSA.
(ii)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturer affirms that the brand family is to be deemed to be its cigarettes for purposes of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, including paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(B)Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the states right to maintain that a brand family constitutes cigarettes of a different tobacco product manufacturer for purposes of calculating payments under the MSA or for purposes of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(5)A tobacco product manufacturer shall maintain all invoices and documentation of sales and other information relied upon for the certification for a period of five years, unless otherwise required by law to maintain them for a longer period of time.
(c)The Attorney General shall develop and publish on its internet website the California Tobacco Directory, which shall list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with this section and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(1)The Attorney General may not include or retain in the Directory the name, brand families, or brand styles of any of the following:
(A)Any participating manufacturer that fails to provide the required certification or to make a payment calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA except to the extent that it is disputing the payment.
(B)Any nonparticipating manufacturer that fails to provide the required certification or whose certification the Attorney General determines is not in compliance with subdivision (b), unless the Attorney General has determined that the violation has been cured to the satisfaction of the Attorney General.
(C)A tobacco product manufacturer that does not hold a valid and current manufacturers license under Section 22979 of the Business and Professions Code, including, but not limited to, a manufacturer whose license has been revoked under subdivision (g) of Section 22979 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)A tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style shall not be included or retained in the Directory if the Attorney General concludes that any of the following is true:
(A)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, any escrow deposit required pursuant to Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code for any period for any brand family, whether or not listed by the nonparticipating manufacturer, has not been fully deposited into a qualified escrow fund governed by a qualified escrow agreement that has been approved by the Attorney General.
(B)Any outstanding final judgment, including interest thereon, for violations of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, this section, Sections 30101.7 and 30165.2, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those sections, has not been fully satisfied for the brand family and the tobacco product manufacturer.
(C)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer by reason of the business plan, business history, trade connections, or compliance and payment history in the state or any other state of any of the principals thereof, the nonparticipating manufacturer fails to provide reasonable assurance that it will comply with the requirements of this section, Section 30165.2, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code. As used in this section, reasonable assurance may include information and documentation establishing to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that a failure to pay in California or elsewhere was the result of a good faith dispute over the payment obligation.
(D)In the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturer has knowingly failed to disclose any material information required or knowingly made any material false statements in the certification of any supporting information or documentation provided.
(E)If the tobacco product manufacturer or its importer, as defined in Section 30019, engages in delivery sales and the tobacco product manufacturer fails to provide or fails to cause its importer to provide reasonable assurances that the delivery seller has fully complied with all requirements of applicable federal and state law, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(i)Chapter 10A (commencing with Section 375) of Title 15 of the United States Code.
(ii)The requirements of Section 30101.7.
(iii)All stamping, marking, and labeling requirements, including, but not limited to, Section 30163, and any other information or indicia requirements imposed by state or federal law.
(iv)All other state laws generally applicable to the sale and distribution of tobacco products.
(3)The Attorney General may not include or retain in the Directory any brand style that has not been tested and marked in compliance with the California Cigarette Fire Safety and Firefighter Protection Act (Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code).
(4)All listings on the Directory shall expire on April 29 of each year. Beginning with the 2023 calendar year, a tobacco product manufacturer shall renew its listing on the Directory by providing the annual certification in compliance with this section and remitting an annual fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per tobacco product manufacturer payable to the Office office of the Attorney General. Any fees received pursuant to this paragraph shall be deposited into the California Tobacco Directory Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all amounts deposited in the California Tobacco Directory Fund are hereby continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the Office office of the Attorney General for the purpose of administering the Directory. The Attorney General may retain a listing for a tobacco product manufacturer on the Directory while the renewal for the certification is pending, provided that if the Attorney General decides not to retain a listing of any manufacturer or brand family while the renewal of the certification is pending, the Attorney General shall comply with the delisting provisions in this section, including paragraph (5).
(5)The Attorney General shall update the Directory as necessary in order to correct mistakes and to add or remove a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style to keep the Directory in conformity with the requirements of this section, Section 30165.2, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and the California Cigarette Fire Safety and Firefighter Protection Act (Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code). The Attorney General shall promptly provide distributors and wholesalers with written notice of each tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, and brand style that the Attorney General has added to, or excluded or removed from, the Directory.
(A)When the Attorney Generals office informs a manufacturer that it will recommend to the Attorney General that the manufacturer or brand family be delisted for cause, the office shall transmit by email, or other practicable means, a copy of the notice of the pending administrative action to the manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and to any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose.
(B)A licensed distributor may purchase, stamp, or sell, and a licensed wholesaler may purchase or sell, products affected by the notice of pending administrative action for no more than 40 days following issuance of the notice of pending administrative action. Before the sale of a product affected by the notice of pending administrative action, and no later than seven days after the notice of pending administrative action, a distributor or wholesaler shall notify each of its existing customers of the pending administrative action.
(C)Upon removal from the Directory of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style, the Attorney General shall transmit by email, or other practicable means, a notice of removal, to the manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and to any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose. No later than seven days after issuance of the notice of removal, a distributor or wholesaler shall provide each of its existing customers a copy of the notice of removal.
(D)Notwithstanding subdivision (e), a licensed retailer may possess, transport, and sell the tax-stamped cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style affected by the notice of removal for no more than 60 days following the effective date of the tobacco product manufacturers brand familys or brand styles removal from the Directory.
(E)After 60 days following removal from the Directory, the cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style identified in the notice of removal are contraband and are subject to seizure and destruction under subdivision (e) of Section 30436 and subdivision (b) of Section 30449, and may not be purchased or sold in the state. This section does not limit or otherwise change the seizure and destruction process of cigarettes under Sections 14950 to 14959, inclusive, of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, Section 14956 of the Health and Safety Code.
(F)If the Attorney General declines to remove a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style from the Directory following issuance of the notice of pending administrative action described in subparagraph (A), the Attorney General shall notify by email, or other practicable means, the tobacco product manufacturer, all licensed distributors and wholesalers, and any retailer or other person who has provided an email address to the Attorney General for this purpose, of the decision not to pursue administrative action. No later than seven days after issuance of this notice, a distributor or wholesaler shall provide each of its existing customers a copy of this notice, and the purchase, stamping, and sales restrictions imposed by subparagraph (B) shall have no further effect.
(G)Upon request of the Attorney General, the department shall provide the Attorney General all email addresses for licensed distributors, wholesalers, and retailers in the departments possession.
(6)Newly qualified and elevated-risk nonparticipating manufacturers shall file with the Attorney General a surety bond in a form and manner directed by the Attorney General.
(A)Notwithstanding any other law, if a newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturer is to be listed in the Directory or if the Attorney General reasonably determines that any nonparticipating manufacturer who has filed a certification pursuant to subdivision (b) poses an elevated risk for noncompliance with this section, Section 30165.2, Part 13 (commencing with Section 30001) of Division 2, or with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, neither the nonparticipating manufacturer nor any of its brand families shall be included in the Directory unless and until the nonparticipating manufacturer, or its United States importer that undertakes joint and several liability for the nonparticipating manufacturers performance in accordance with subparagraph (E) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), has posted a bond in accordance with this section.
(B)The bonds shall be posted by a corporate surety located within the United States in an amount equal to the greater of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or the amount of escrow the nonparticipating manufacturer in either its current or predecessor form was required to deposit as a result of the largest of its most recent five calendar years sales in California. The bond shall be written in favor of the State of California and shall be conditioned on the performance by the nonparticipating manufacturer, or its importer that undertakes joint and several liability for the nonparticipating manufacturers performance in accordance with subparagraph (E) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), of all its duties and obligations under this section and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code and payment of all state taxes for the sale or distribution of cigarettes and tobacco products in this state during the year in which the certification is filed and the next succeeding calendar year. The bond may be drawn upon by the department or the Attorney General to cover unsatisfied escrow obligations, tax obligations, claims for penalties, claims for monetary damages, and any other liabilities that are subject to a claim of sovereign immunity against enforcement of the laws specified above.
(C)A nonparticipating manufacturer may be deemed to pose an elevated risk for noncompliance with this section, Section 30165.2, or Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code if any of the following apply:
(i)The nonparticipating manufacturer or any affiliate thereof has failed to deposit fully the amount due on an escrow obligation with respect to any state at any time during the current calendar year or within the past three calendar years unless either of the following occur:
(I)The nonparticipating manufacturer did not underdeposit knowingly or recklessly and the manufacturer promptly cured the underdeposit within 180 days of notice of it.
(II)The underdeposit or lack of deposit is the subject of a good faith dispute as documented to the satisfaction of the Attorney General and the underdeposit or lack of deposit is cured within 180 days of entry of a final order establishing the amount of the required escrow deposit.
(ii)Any state has removed the nonparticipating manufacturer or its brand families or an affiliate or any of the affiliates brand families from the states tobacco Directory for noncompliance with a state escrow deposit or tobacco tax law at any time during the calendar year or within the past three calendar years.
(iii)Any state has litigation pending against, or an unsatisfied final judgment against, the nonparticipating manufacturer or any affiliate thereof for escrow or for penalties, fees, costs, refunds, or attorneys fees related to noncompliance with state escrow laws.
(iv)The nonparticipating manufacturer sells its cigarettes or tobacco products directly to consumers via remote or other non-face-to-face means.
(v)A state or federal court has determined that the nonparticipating manufacturer has violated any tobacco tax or tobacco control law or engaged in unfair business practice or unfair competition.
(vi)Any state has suspended or revoked the nonparticipating manufacturers license to engage in any aspect of tobacco business.
(vii)Any state or federal court has determined that the nonparticipating manufacturer failed to comply with state or federal law imposing marking, labeling, and stamping requirements or requiring information to be affixed to, or contained in, the labels, markings, or packaging.
(viii)During any of the past three years, escrow and equity fee payments were made on less than 80 percent of the nonparticipating manufacturers nationwide cigarette sales as measured by excise taxes collected by the federal government and, in the case of Puerto Rico, arbitrios de cigarrillos collected by the Puerto Rico taxing authority.
(ix)As of January 1, 2023, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in or into the state by distributors that have not reported their last 12 months of in-state sales electronically and in the manner prescribed by both the department and the Attorney General.
(x)For a domestic manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in the state through one or more distributors that do not purchase directly from the nonparticipating manufacturer. For a foreign manufacturer, the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes are sold in the state through one or more distributors that do not purchase directly from an importer that has accepted joint and several liability pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (f).
(xi)The nonparticipating manufacturer fails to submit or complete any required forms, documents, certification, or notices, in a timely manner or, to the satisfaction of the Attorney General or the department.
(D)As used in this paragraph, newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturer means a nonparticipating manufacturer that has not previously been listed in the Directory during the last 12 months. These newly qualified nonparticipating manufacturers may be required to post a bond in accordance with this section for the next three years of their listing, or longer if they have been determined to pose an elevated risk for noncompliance.
(7)The Attorney General shall provide each tobacco product manufacturer that has provided all certifications and other information required by this section with a written acknowledgment of receipt within seven business days after receiving the certifications and other materials. Each tobacco product manufacturer shall provide to each distributor to whom it sells or ships cigarettes a copy of each acknowledgment of receipt provided to the tobacco product manufacturer by the Attorney General. Upon request, the Attorney General shall provide any distributor with a copy of the most recent written acknowledgment of receipt provided to the tobacco product manufacturer.
(8)The Attorney General shall not include or retain in the directory any brand style that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)(1)The Attorney General may exclude or remove from the Directory a tobacco product manufacturer or any of its brand families, based on a determination that the manufacturer is not a participating manufacturer that has provided the required certification and made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA, except to the extent that it is disputing the payment, or in the case of a nonparticipating manufacturer, has not made all escrow payments required by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, in accordance with that subdivision, or has not complied with this section or Section 30165.2, or the tobacco product manufacturer has not complied with any state or federal delivery sales laws applicable to sales and distribution of tobacco products in this state. Before the exclusion or removal may take effect, the Attorney General shall notify the tobacco product manufacturer of this determination.
(2)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1), the tobacco product manufacturer may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, and may seek relief from the determination, by filing a petition for writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure for that purpose in the Superior Court for the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination, if the participating manufacturer has made all payments calculated by the independent auditor to be due from it under the MSA, except to the extent that it is disputing payment, or if a nonparticipating manufacturer has paid into escrow the full amount of any deficiency in the escrow payments that the Attorney General has determined the nonparticipating manufacturer was required to have made under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, including any installment payments required under subdivision (h), pending final resolution of the action.
(e)(1)No person shall affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 30163, or pay the tax levied pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2 on a tobacco product defined as a cigarette under this section, unless the brand family and brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco product, and the tobacco product manufacturer that makes or sells the cigarettes, are included on the Directory.
(2)No person shall sell, offer, or possess for sale in this state, ship or otherwise distribute into or within this state or import for personal consumption in this state, cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer, brand family, or brand style not included in the Directory.
(3)No person shall do either of the following:
(A)Sell or distribute cigarettes that the person knows or should know are intended to be distributed in violation of paragraphs (1) and (2).
(B)Acquire, hold, own, possess, transport, import, or cause to be imported cigarettes that the person knows or should know are intended to be distributed in violation of paragraphs (1) and (2).
(f)(1)A nonresident or foreign nonparticipating manufacturer that has not registered to do business in the state as a foreign corporation or business entity shall, as a condition precedent to having its brand families or brand styles listed or retained in the Directory, appoint and continually engage without interruption the services of an agent in this state to act as agent for the service of process on whom all process, and any action or proceeding against the nonresident or foreign nonparticipating manufacturer concerning or arising out of the enforcement of this section, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, may be served in any manner authorized by law. This service shall constitute legal and valid service of process on the nonparticipating manufacturer. The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide the name, address, telephone number, and proof of the appointment and availability of the agent to the satisfaction of the Attorney General. A nonparticipating manufacturer located outside of the United States shall, as an additional condition precedent to having its brand families listed or retained in the Directory, cause each of its importers into the United States of any of its brand families to be sold in the state to appoint and continually engage without interruption the services of an agent in the state in accordance with this section. All obligations of a nonparticipating manufacturer imposed by this section with respect to appointment of its agent shall likewise apply to importers with respect to appointment of their agents.
(2)The nonparticipating manufacturer shall provide notice to the Attorney General 30 calendar days before termination of the authority of an agent and shall further provide proof to the satisfaction of the Attorney General of the appointment of a new agent no less than five calendar days before the termination of an existing agent appointment. In the event an agent terminates an agency appointment, the nonparticipating manufacturer shall notify the Attorney General of said termination within five calendar days and shall include proof to the satisfaction of the Attorney General of the appointment of a new agent.
(3)(A)A nonparticipating manufacturer whose products are sold in this state without appointing or designating an agent as herein required shall be deemed to have appointed the Secretary of State as its agent. The appointment of the Secretary of State as the agent for service of process pursuant to this provision does not satisfy the condition precedent specified in paragraph (1) to having its brand families listed or retained in the Directory.
(B)The Attorney General or their authorized representative may proceed against a nonparticipating manufacturer in the courts of this state pursuant to subparagraph (A) by service of process upon the Secretary of State. The service may be made by delivering by hand to the Secretary of State or their authorized representative one copy of the process for each defendant to be served, together with a declaration stating that service is being made upon the Secretary of State pursuant to subparagraph (A), setting forth the last known address of the nonparticipating manufacturer, and signed by the party to the action seeking service.
(C)Upon receipt of the records described in subparagraph (B), the Secretary of State or their authorized representative shall give notice of the service of process to any nonparticipating manufacturer served by forwarding a copy of the process to the nonparticipating manufacturer at the last known address identified in the declaration.
(4)For each nonparticipating manufacturer located outside the United States, each importer into the United States of any nonparticipating manufacturers brand families that are sold in the state shall bear joint and several liability with the nonparticipating manufacturer for deposit of all escrow due under, and payment of all costs and attorneys fees imposed in accordance with, Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, and payment of all fees, costs, attorneys fees, penalties, and refunds imposed or required by this section or Section 30165.2. Each tobacco product manufacturer and importer, that sells or intends to sell cigarettes in California, shall obtain and maintain a license as a manufacturer or importer in compliance with Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code. Each nonparticipating manufacturer and its importers shall report in the manner, including electronically, as required by the Attorney General, all cigarettes sold in this state each month, including, but not limited to, the quantity, including tobacco weight and number of cigarettes, the wholesale cost, and sale price of each brand family and brand style. Any tobacco product manufacturer or importer that fails to file the report as required by the Attorney General shall be liable for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of either of the following:
(A)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes that were not reported as required by the Attorney General.
(B)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(g)(1)Not later than 25 days after the end of each calendar quarter, and more frequently if directed by the department or the Attorney General, each distributor shall submit any information as the department or Attorney General requires to facilitate compliance with this section, including, but not limited to, a list by brand family of the total number of cigarettes or, in the case of roll your own, the total ounces for which the distributor affixed stamps during the previous calendar month or otherwise paid the tax due. The distributor shall maintain, and shall make available to the department and the Attorney General, all invoices and documentation of sales of all nonparticipating manufacturer cigarettes and any other information relied upon in reporting to the department and the Attorney General for a period of five years.
(2)(A)Notwithstanding Section 30455, the department shall disclose to the Attorney General any information received under this part for purposes of determining compliance with and enforcing the provisions of this section, Sections 30101.7 and 30165.2, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions. The department and Attorney General may share the information received under this section with any of the following:
(i)Other federal, state, or local agencies for purposes of enforcing this section, Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, or corresponding laws of other states or the United States.
(ii)A court arbitrator, or data clearinghouse or similar entity for purposes of resolving disputes arising under, and making calculations and determinations required by, the MSA or related settlement agreements and with counsel for the parties or expert witnesses in any such proceeding, provided that the recipients agree to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information.
(B)The department and Attorney General shall not publicly disclose confidential information except as necessary to carry out their functions and duties.
(3)At any time, the Attorney General may require from the nonparticipating manufacturer proof from the financial institution in which the manufacturer has established a qualified escrow fund for the purpose of compliance with Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, of the amount of money in the fund being held on behalf of the state and the dates of deposits, and listing the amounts of all withdrawals from the fund and the dates thereof.
(4)In addition to the information required to be submitted pursuant to this section or Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions, the Attorney General may require a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, importer, or tobacco product manufacturer to submit any additional information, including, but not limited to, samples of the packaging or labeling of each brand family, as is necessary to enable the Attorney General to determine whether a tobacco product manufacturer or importer has complied, is in compliance, and, if applicable pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), has provided reasonable assurance that it will comply or continue to comply with this section, Section 30165.2, Part 8 (commencing with Section 14950) of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to those provisions.
(h)To promote compliance with this section, the Attorney General may promulgate regulations requiring a tobacco product manufacturer subject to the requirements of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 to make the escrow deposits required in quarterly or other specified installments during the year in which the sales covered by the deposits are made. The Attorney General may require production of information sufficient to enable the Attorney General to determine the adequacy of the amount of the installment deposit.
(i)(1)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, upon a finding that a distributor licensed by the department has violated subdivision (e), or paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), the department may take the following actions:
(A)In the case of the first offense, the department may revoke or suspend the license or licenses issued to the distributor by the department, pursuant to the procedures applicable to the revocation of a license set forth in Sections 30148 and 30158, and Section 22980.3 of the Business and Professions Code. Each stamp affixed and each sale or offer to sell cigarettes in violation of subdivision (e) shall constitute a separate violation.
(B)In the case of a second or any subsequent offense that the department determines to be a violation of subdivision (e), in addition to the action authorized under subparagraph (A), the department may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of either of the following:
(i)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes.
(ii)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(2)(A)A distributor licensed by the department in any action for a violation of subdivision (e) shall have a defense provided that either of the following is true:
(i)At the time of the violation, the cigarettes or tobacco products claimed to be the subject of the alleged violation belonged to a brand family and brand style that was included on the Directory.
(ii)At the time of the violation, the distributor possessed a copy of the Attorney Generals most recent written acknowledgment of receipt of the certifications and other information required as a condition of including the brand family and brand style on the Directory.
(B)The defense described in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) is not available to a distributor if, at the time of the violation, the Attorney General had provided the distributor with written notice that the brand family or brand style had been excluded or removed from the Directory, or the distributor failed to provide the Attorney General with a current address for the receipt of written notice through email as required by paragraph (4) of subdivision (c).
(3)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, the Attorney General may bring a civil action on behalf of the state for civil penalties and injunctive relief against a retailer, distributor, wholesaler, manufacturer, importer, or other person that violates subdivision (e), or paragraph (1) or (4) of subdivision (g). The court, upon a finding of a violation, shall impose a civil penalty to be paid to the General Fund. The amount of the civil penalty may not exceed the greater of either of the following:
(A)Five times the retail value of the cigarettes.
(B)Five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(4)In addition to any other civil or criminal penalty provided by law, the Attorney General may bring a civil action on behalf of the state for civil penalties and injunctive relief against any nonparticipating manufacturer that does not submit timely, complete, and accurate certifications to the Attorney General under this section and subdivision (c) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code regarding its sales of cigarettes in this state, whether directly or through a distributor, retailers, or similar intermediary or intermediaries, and tobacco escrow account compliance for its ongoing and previous sales in this state. The court, upon a finding of a violation, may do both of the following:
(A)Impose a civil penalty to be paid to the General Fund not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day the nonparticipating manufacturer fails to timely, completely, and accurately certify to the Attorney General.
(B)Issue an injunction prohibiting the nonparticipating manufacturers cigarettes from being sold in or into the state until the failure to certify has been fully cured.
(5)A violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (e) shall constitute a misdemeanor.
(j)If a distributor affixes a stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes under subdivision (a) of Section 30163, or pays the tax levied under Sections 30123 and 30131.2 on a tobacco product defined as a cigarette under this section, during the period between the date on which the brand family of the cigarettes or tobacco product was excluded or removed from the Directory and the date on which the distributor received notice of the exclusion or removal under paragraph (4) of subdivision (c), then both of the following shall apply:
(1)The distributor shall be entitled to a credit for the tax paid by the distributor with respect to the cigarette or tobacco product to which the stamp or meter impression was affixed, or the tax paid during that period. The distributor shall comply with regulations prescribed by the department regarding refunds and credits that are adopted pursuant to Section 30177.5. If the distributor has sold the cigarette or tobacco product to a wholesaler or retailer, and has received payment from the wholesaler or retailer, the distributor shall provide the credit to the wholesaler or retailer.
(2)The brand family may not be included on or restored to the Directory until the tobacco product manufacturer has reimbursed the distributor for the cost to the distributor of the cigarettes or tobacco product to which the stamp or meter impression was affixed, or the tax paid, during that period.
(k)Any tobacco product manufacturer that falsely represents any of the following to any person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for each false representation:
(1)Any information required under subdivision (b).
(2)That the tobacco product manufacturer is a participating manufacturer.
(3)That the tobacco product manufacturer or any other person has made any or all escrow payments required by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, if applicable to the manufacturer.
(4)That it has complied with subdivision (b), or with paragraph (1) of subdivision (g), if applicable to the tobacco product manufacturer.
(l)A violation of subdivision (e) shall constitute unfair competition under Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code.
(m)No person shall be issued a distributors license pursuant to Section 30140 unless that person has certified in writing that the person will comply fully with this section. Any person who makes a certification pursuant to this subdivision that asserts the truth of any material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment of up to one year in the county jail, or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both the imprisonment and the fine.
(n)The Attorney General may adopt rules and regulations to implement this section. The rules and regulations may establish procedures for including in the Directory tobacco product manufacturers that are not participating manufacturers and were not required to make escrow payments under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 104557 of the Health and Safety Code, for sales made during any preceding calendar year, and brand families of those tobacco product manufacturers. The rules and regulations may also establish procedures for seizure and destruction of cigarettes forfeited to the state pursuant to Section 30436 or Section 30449, including, but not limited to, the state facilities that may be used for the destruction of contraband cigarettes. Nothing in this section shall affect the authority of local law enforcement and local government officials to seize and destroy contraband under existing state or local law. The regulations adopted to effect the purposes of this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. For purposes of that chapter, including Section 11349.6 of the Government Code, the adoption of the regulations shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and general welfare. Notwithstanding subdivision (e) of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code, the regulations shall be repealed 180 days after their effective date, unless the adopting authority or agency complies with that chapter, as provided in subdivision (e) of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code.
(o)In any action brought by the state to enforce this section, the state shall be entitled to recover the costs of investigation, expert witness fees, costs of the action, and reasonable attorneys fees.
(p)The Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative shall have the authority to:
(1)Conduct audits and investigations of the following:
(A)A nonparticipating manufacturer and its importers.
(B)Distributors, retailers, and wholesalers, as defined in Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Profession Code, and this part.
(C)Persons or entities engaged in delivery sales as defined in Section 30101.7.
(2)Upon reasonable cause to believe that a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, issue subpoenas, compel the attendance of witnesses, administer oaths, certify to official acts, take depositions within and without the state, as now provided by law, and compel the production of pertinent books, payrolls, accounts, papers, records, documents, and testimony relevant to investigations. If a person refuses, without good cause, to be examined or to answer a legal and pertinent question, or to produce a document or other evidence when ordered to do so by the Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative, the Attorney General or the Attorney Generals authorized representative may apply to the superior court of the county where the person is in attendance or located, upon affidavit, for an order returnable in no less than two nor more than five days, directing the person to show cause why the person should not be examined, answer a legal or pertinent question, or produce a document, record, or other evidence. Upon the hearing, if the court determines that the person, without good cause, has refused to be examined, answer legal or pertinent questions, or produce a document, record, or other evidence, the court may order compliance with the subpoena and assess all costs and reasonable attorneys fees against the person. If the motion for an order is granted and the person thereafter fails to comply with the order, the court may make orders as are provided for by law. Subpoenas shall be served and witness fees and mileage paid as allowed in civil cases in the courts of the State of California.
(q)In any action regarding a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, or of Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code, reports submitted to the department pursuant to Section 30182 or Section 22978.1, 22978.4, or 22978.5 of the Business and Professions Code, shall be admissible in evidence and shall be presumed to accurately state the number of cigarettes stamped during the time period by the stamping agent that submitted the report absent a contrary showing by the nonparticipating manufacturer or importer. Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the right of the state to maintain that reports are incorrect or do not accurately reflect a nonparticipating manufacturers sales in the state during the time period in question, and the presumption shall not apply in the event the state does so maintain.
(r)In any action regarding a violation of this article or of Article 3 (commencing with Section 104555) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, or of Section 22963 of the Business and Professions Code, or of Section 30101.7, or of Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code, sufficient notice of the action to the alleged violator shall be given by complaint written in the English language. The state shall not be required to bear any expense of translating the complaint into another language.
(s)Unless otherwise expressly provided, the remedies or penalties provided by this section are cumulative to each other and to the remedies or penalties available under all other laws of this state.
SEC. 5.SEC. 6.Section 30435 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30435.(a)An employee of the department, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, is authorized to enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place described in subdivision (b) or (c).
(b)Any building, facility, site, or place at which cigarette or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored, or any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed under this part, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the Master Settlement Agreement, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, Section 30165.1.
(c)Any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(d)Any inspection performed under the authority of this section shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at a reasonable time, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the building, facility, site, or place that is inspected.
(e)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection authorized under this section is subject to the penalty imposed by Section 30471.
SEC. 6.SEC. 7.Section 30436 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30436.The following property, upon seizure by the department, is hereby forfeited to the state:
(a)Cigarettes or tobacco products transported upon the highways, roads, or streets of this state in violation of Section 30431 or Section 30432.
(b)Cigarettes not contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamp or meter impressions or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid, which are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent of the person to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products without payment of the taxes imposed by this part.
(c)Any cigarette or tobacco product vending machine, together with the cigarettes, tobacco products, money, or other contents thereof, that has been loaded, in whole or in part, with packages of cigarettes that do not have California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions affixed or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid.
(d)Cigarettes contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions in violation of Section 30163.
(e)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2, in violation of Section 30165.1, regardless of whether the violation is subject to the defense described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 30165.1.
(f)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code.
SEC. 7.SEC. 8.Section 30449 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30449.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (b), any property, except money, forfeited to the state under this chapter shall be sold by the department at public auction. Notice of the sale shall be given by posting a written notice of the time and place of sale in three public places in the county where the property is to be sold for not less than five days nor more than 10 days before the sale. If the department is unable to sell any property forfeited to the state under this part or, if the department determines that the property is unsalable, it may destroy that property.
(b)(1)Any property forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(2)Any cigarettes forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(3)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(4)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code shall be destroyed.
(c)(1)A record shall be kept of all property destroyed pursuant to this section showing the nature of the property, the quantity, the reason for, and the cost and manner of destruction.
(2)The person from whom the property was seized shall be liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this section, unless that person is a consumer that made a bona fide retail purchase of the product. section.
(3)The proceeds of the sale and any money forfeited to the state shall be deposited in the General Fund.
SEC. 8.SEC. 9.The Legislature finds and declares that Section 3 of this act, which adds Section 104559.1 to the Health and Safety Code, imposes a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the Attorney General, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
SEC. 9.SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufactures manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Section 22980 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:22980.(a)(1)Any peace officer, or board A peace officer or department employee granted limited peace officer status pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 830.11 of the Penal Code, upon presenting appropriate credentials, is authorized to enter any place as described in paragraph (2) or (3) and to conduct inspections in accordance with the following paragraphs, inclusive. all of the following:
(2)(1)Inspections shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
(3)(2)Inspections may be at any place at which cigarettes or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored or at any site where evidence of activities involving evasion of cigarette or tobacco products tax and violations of Section 30165.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code may be discovered.
(4)(3)Inspections may be at any place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(4)Inspections shall be requested or conducted no more than once in a 24-hour period.
(b)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection shall be subject to the penalties imposed pursuant to Section 22981.
SEC. 2.SEC. 3.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)(1)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that describes each brand style, documents the products submission and order status under Section 905(j) or 910(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), and states that it lacks a characterizing flavor. Upon does all of the following:
(A)Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B)Certifies that each brand style is not adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C., Sec. 301 et seq.).
(C)Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(2)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding the a brand styles lack of characterizing flavor.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(3)(A)Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style.
(B)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph and designated as nonpublic shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 905(j) or 910(b) of the FFDCA. 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.
(f)(1)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines does not possess is adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 905(j) or 910(b) 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA. The
(2)(A)The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination. determination.
(B)Removal of a brand style from the UTL will be effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C)A manufacturer or importer may provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in paragraph (1) within 30 days of the notice provided pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(D)Information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state.
(k)(1)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2)A manufacturer or importer may challenge a decision by the Attorney General pursuant to paragraph (1) in addition to providing additional materials to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision (f).
(l)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before July 1, December 31, 2025.
(m)No person shall affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes as described in Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 30161) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30101) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
(n)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(o)No distributor may sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. For each tobacco product sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor according to the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) and not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation.
(3)A civil penalty of not less than four thousand dollars ($4,000) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not less than five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500) and not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(p)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(q)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating characterizing flavor determinations, requiring a fee for manufacturer and importer certifications, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(r)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(s)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104495, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(t)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 3.SEC. 4.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(12)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(13)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(14)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(15)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(16)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in paragraph (8) of subdivision (a) of Section 104495, as that provision may be amended from time to time.
(17)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(18)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 5.Section 30435 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30435.(a)An employee of the board, department, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, is authorized to enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place described in subdivision (b). (b) or (c).
(b)Any building, facility, site, or place at which cigarette or tobacco products are sold, produced, or stored, or any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed under this part, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the Master Settlement Agreement, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 104556 of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, Section 30165.1.
(c)Any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.
(c)(d)Any inspection performed under the authority of this section shall be performed in a reasonable manner and at a reasonable time, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the building, facility, site, or place that is inspected.
(d)(e)Any person that refuses to allow an inspection authorized under this section is subject to the penalty imposed by Section 30471.
SEC. 4.SEC. 6.Section 30436 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30436.The following property, upon seizure by the board, department, is hereby forfeited to the state:
(a)Cigarettes or tobacco products transported upon the highways, roads, or streets of this state in violation of Section 30431 or Section 30432.
(b)Cigarettes not contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamp or meter impressions or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid, which are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent of the person to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products without payment of the taxes imposed by this part.
(c)Any cigarette or tobacco product vending machine, together with the cigarettes, tobacco products, money money, or other contents thereof, that has been loaded, in whole or in part, with packages of cigarettes that do not have California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions affixed or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid.
(d)Cigarettes contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions in violation of Section 30163.
(e)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2, in violation of Section 30165.1, regardless of whether the violation is subject to the defense described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 30165.1.
(f)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code.
SEC. 7.Section 30449 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30449.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (b), (c), or (d), (b), any property, except money, forfeited to the state under this chapter shall be sold by the board department at public auction. Notice of the sale shall be given by posting a written notice of the time and place of sale in three public places in the county where the property is to be sold for not less than five days nor more than 10 days before the sale. If the board department is unable to sell any property forfeited to the state under this part or, if the board department determines that the property is unsalable, it may destroy that property.
(b)(1)Any property forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(c)(2)Any cigarettes forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(3)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 30436 shall be destroyed.
(d)(4)Any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state pursuant to Division 8.6 (commencing with Section 22970) of the Business and Professions Code shall be destroyed.
(e)(c)(1)A record shall be kept of all property destroyed pursuant to this section showing the nature of the property, the quantity, the reason for, and the cost and manner of destruction. The
(2)The person from whom the property was seized shall be liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this section, unless that person is a consumer that made a bona fide retail purchase of the product.
(3)The proceeds of the sale and any money forfeited to the state shall be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the General Fund.
SEC. 8.The Legislature finds and declares that Section 3 of this act, which adds Section 104559.1 to the Health and Safety Code, imposes a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the Attorney General, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
SEC. 5.SEC. 9.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
REVISIONS: HeadingLines 3 and 4.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)A large and increasing number of flavored tobacco products are available for sale in California, which appeal to minors and nonsmokers, initiate nonusers, and impede cessation.
(b)There is evidence that those products are disproportionately used by youth and marketed to certain minorities and marginalized communities.
(c)A growing number of cities and counties have restricted or banned the retail sale of flavored tobacco products, and a statewide ban on the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products has been approved by California voters.
(d)Because many tobacco manufactures do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.
(e)There is a need in California for a reliable and complete public list of unflavored tobacco products, meaning tobacco products that do not have a flavor other than that of tobacco.
SEC. 2.Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 104559.1) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:4.5.Unflavored Tobacco104559.1.(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain on the Attorney Generals internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. This list shall be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
(b)Every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products shall submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Any submission under this section shall be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that describes each brand style, documents the products submission and order status under Section 905(j) or 910(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), and states that it lacks a characterizing flavor. Upon the request of the Attorney General, a manufacturer or importer shall provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding the lack of characterizing flavor.
(c)In determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor the Attorney General shall consider, among other factors, information received from the manufacturer or importer to the Attorney General regarding the brand style.
(d)The Attorney General shall presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the products labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. This presumption may be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
(e)The Attorney General shall decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may decline to include on the UTL any brand style that has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 905(j) or 910(b) of the FFDCA.
(f)The Attorney General shall remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines has a characterizing flavor. The Attorney General may remove from the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General determines does not possess a formal authorization, approval, or order under Section 905(j) or 910(b) of the FFDCA. The Attorney General shall promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the Attorney General removes it from the UTL. This notice shall include the basis for the Attorney Generals determination.
(g)Any brand style not on the UTL shall be deemed a flavored tobacco product under subdivision (b) of Section 104559.5.
(h)Every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission under this section shall submit updated information to the Attorney General whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. This updated information shall be provided to the Attorney General by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
(i)Every manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to this section shall also do all of the following:
(1)Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of this section and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(2)Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state.
(3)Identify the registered agent to the Attorney General.
(4)Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this section or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this section.
(j)The Attorney General may require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state.
(k)Upon receiving notice from the Attorney General that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the Attorney General declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the Attorney General that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor may challenge the Attorney Generals determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the Attorney General, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. The filing of the petition shall not operate to stay the Attorney Generals determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(l)The Attorney General shall publish the UTL beginning on or before July 1, 2025.
(m)No person shall affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes as described in Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 30161) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 30101) of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
(n)The Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorneys fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
(o)No distributor may sell any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. For each tobacco product sold in violation of this subdivision, the Attorney General may assess civil penalties against the distributor according to the following schedule:
(1)A civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation.
(2)A civil penalty of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) and not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation.
(3)A civil penalty of not less than four thousand dollars ($4,000) and not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period.
(4)A civil penalty of not less than five thousand five hundred dollars ($5,500) and not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period.
(5)A civil penalty of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
(p)Whenever the Attorney General prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court shall award to the Attorney General all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorneys fees, and costs. Awards under this section shall be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund established pursuant to Section 12530 of the Government Code.
(q)The Attorney General may adopt those rules and regulations the Attorney General deems necessary to implement the purposes of this section, including regulations further delineating characterizing flavor determinations, requiring a fee for manufacturer and importer certifications, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. The regulations adopted to implement this section are emergency regulations in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
(r)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this section, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this section.
(s)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Brand style means a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
(2)Characterizing flavor has the same meaning as in Section 104559.5.
(3)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in Section 104495, but excludes looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined in that section.
(4)UTL means the Unflavored Tobacco List described in subdivision (a).
(t)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 3.Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:104559.5.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Characterizing flavor means a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or aroma odor of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product. Characterizing flavors include, but are not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. A tobacco product shall not be determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings or the provision of ingredient information. Rather, it is the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, as described in the first sentence of this definition, that constitutes a characterizing flavor. including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or a cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
(2)Constituent means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product.
(3)Department means the State Department of Public Health.
(4)Enforcing agency means the State Department of Public Health, another state agency, including, but not limited to, the office of the Attorney General, or a local law enforcement agency, including, but not limited to, a city attorney, district attorney, or county counsel.
(5)Flavored shisha tobacco product means any shisha tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor.
(6)Flavored tobacco product means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Flavored tobacco product includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the Unflavored Tobacco List established and maintained by the Attorney General pursuant to Section 104559.1.
(7)Hookah means a type of waterpipe, used to smoke shisha or other tobacco products, with a long flexible tube for drawing aerosol through water. Components of a hookah may include heads, stems, bowls, and hoses.
(8)Hookah tobacco retailer means a tobacco retailer that is engaged in the retail sale of shisha tobacco products, hookah, and hookah smoking accessories.
(9)Labeling means written, printed, pictorial, or graphic matter upon a tobacco product or any of its packaging.
(10)Loose leaf Looseleaf tobacco consists of cut or shredded pipe tobacco, usually sold in pouches, excluding any tobacco product which, because of its appearance, type, packaging, or labeling, is suitable for use and likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as tobacco for making cigarettes, including roll-your-own cigarettes.
(11)Packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or, if no other container, any wrapping, including cellophane, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer.
(12)Premium cigar means any cigar that is handmade, is not mass produced by use of mechanization, has a wrapper that is made entirely from whole tobacco leaf, and has a wholesale price of no less than twelve dollars ($12). A premium cigar does not have a filter, tip, or nontobacco mouthpiece and is capped by hand.
(13)Retail location means both of the following:
(A)A building from which tobacco products are sold at retail.
(B)Any vending machine, vehicle, mobile unit, booth, stand, or concession that conducts in-person sales of tobacco products directly to the public.
(14)Sale or sold means a sale as that term is defined in Section 30006 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(15)Shisha tobacco product means a tobacco product smoked or intended to be smoked in a hookah. Shisha tobacco product includes, and may be referred to as, hookah tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, maassel, narghile, and argileh. Shisha tobacco product does not include any electronic devices, such as an electronic hookah, electronic cigarette, or electronic tobacco product.
(16)Tobacco product means a tobacco product as defined in paragraph (8) of subdivision (a) of Section 104495, as that provision may be amended from time to time.
(17)Tobacco product flavor enhancer means a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product.
(18)Tobacco retailer means a person who engages in this state in the sale of tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location. Tobacco retailer includes a person who operates vending machines from which tobacco products are sold in this state.
(b)(1)A tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailers agents or employees, shall not sell, offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer.
(2)There is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturers agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the products labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The hookah tobacco retailer has a valid license to sell tobacco products issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22971.7) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The hookah tobacco retailer does not permit any person under 21 years of age to be present or enter the premises at any time.
(3)The hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all relevant state and local laws relating to the sale of tobacco products.
(4)If consumption of tobacco products is allowed on the premises of the hookah tobacco retailer, the hookah tobacco retailer shall operate in accordance with all state and local laws relating to the consumption of tobacco products on the premises of a tobacco retailer, including, but not limited to, Section 6404.5 of the Labor Code.
(d)Subdivision (b) does not apply to sales of premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises.
(e)Subdivision (b) does not apply to loose leaf looseleaf tobacco or premium cigars.
(f)(1)An enforcing agency may assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates subdivision (b) according to the schedule of civil penalties prescribed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code. In the case of a corporation or business with more than one retail location, the number of accumulated violations for purposes of the penalty schedule shall be determined in accordance with subdivision (h) of that section.
(2)In addition to the civil penalties described in paragraph (1), upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, the department, within 60 days of the date of service of the final administrative adjudication on the parties or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation, shall notify the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation who shall then assess a civil penalty of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) and suspend or revoke a license issued pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 22972) of Division 8.6 of the Business and Professions Code, in accordance with the schedule listed in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22958 of the Business and Professions Code.
(3)Notwithstanding paragraph (7), the civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (2) shall be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund and shall be made available to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of meeting its duties prescribed in paragraph (2).
(4)The provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 55121) of Part 30 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code apply with respect to the collection of the penalty imposed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration pursuant to paragraph (2).
(5)The department shall, upon request, provide information concerning any person or entity that has been assessed a civil penalty for violation of this section to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration when the department has notified the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration of the violation.
(6)Proceedings under this section shall be conducted pursuant to Section 131071, except in cases where a civil penalty is assessed by an enforcing agency other than the department, in which case proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures of that agency that are consistent with Section 131071.
(7)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3), all moneys collected as civil penalties by the department or by any other state agency or department pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Sale of Tobacco to Minors Control Account.
(g)(1)Primary responsibility for enforcement of this section shall be with the department. In carrying out its enforcement responsibilities, the department may conduct onsite sting inspections at tobacco retailers randomly, in response to public complaints, or at retailers where violations have previously occurred. Agents of the department, while conducting enforcement activities pursuant to this section, are peace officers and are subject to all of the powers and immunities granted to Food and Drug Section inspectors pursuant to Section 106500 in the same manner as are any Food and Drug Section inspectors of the department.
(2)In addition to the primary enforcement responsibility assumed by the department, another enforcing agency may conduct inspections and assess penalties for violations of this section if that enforcing agency complies with the applicable provisions of this section and with all other applicable provisions of law.
(3)State and local enforcing agencies are encouraged, in order to avoid duplication, to share the results of inspections and coordinate with the department when enforcing this section.
(4)An enforcing agency may use audio or video recording equipment when conducting inspections, to record and document illegal sales or attempted sales.
(h)(1)The department may adopt any regulations that it determines are necessary for the enforcement of this section. The regulations shall be adopted by the department in the manner prescribed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(2)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement this section. Any emergency regulation shall be adopted in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Emergency regulations adopted shall remain in effect until regulations have been adopted pursuant to paragraph (1).
(i)This section does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by this section. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between this section and a local standard that imposes greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail.
SEC. 4.Section 30436 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:30436.The following property, upon seizure by the board, is hereby forfeited to the state:
(a)Cigarettes or tobacco products transported upon the highways, roads, or streets of this state in violation of Section 30431 or Section 30432.
(b)Cigarettes not contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamp or meter impressions or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid, which are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent of the person to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products without payment of the taxes imposed by this part.
(c)Any cigarette or tobacco product vending machine, together with the cigarettes, tobacco products, money or other contents thereof, that has been loaded, in whole or in part, with packages of cigarettes that do not have California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions affixed or tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax has not been paid.
(d)Cigarettes contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions in violation of Section 30163.
(e)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid pursuant to Sections 30123 and 30131.2, in violation of Section 30165.1, regardless of whether the violation is subject to the defense described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 30165.1.
(f)Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code.
SEC. 5.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2024 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 849, Statutes of 2024. |
| Sep 28, 2024 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 6, 2024 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 65. Noes 2.). |
| Aug 28, 2024 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | Assembly Rule 77 suspended. |
| Aug 27, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 7.). |
| Aug 26, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 19, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (August 15). |
| Aug 5, 2024 | In committee: Referred to suspense file. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 26). |
| Jun 17, 2024 | In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. |
| May 29, 2024 | Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD. |
| May 22, 2024 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 21, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 4. Page 5415.) |
| May 20, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 16, 2024 | Assembly Rule 63 suspended. |
| May 16, 2024 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (May 16). |
| May 16, 2024 | Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5215.) |
| May 16, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. |
| May 15, 2024 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Apr 16, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | Coauthors revised. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| Apr 1, 2024 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD. |
| Feb 17, 2024 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 18. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2024 | AB 3218 Wood Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 27, 2024 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB3218 Wood et al. By Glazer | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 15, 2024 | Do pass as amended | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Aug 5, 2024 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 2, 2024 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| Jun 26, 2024 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary] | Senate Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
|
| May 21, 2024 | AB 3218 Wood Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 16, 2024 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 16, 2024 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| Apr 9, 2024 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] | Assembly Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Alameda County Board of Supervisors | ** Support | |
| American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network | ** Support | |
| American Heart Association | ** Support | |
| American Lung Association Of California | ** Support | |
| American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association | ** Against | |
| Attorney General Rob Bonta | ** Support | |
| California Academy Of Family Physicians | ** Support | |
| California African American Chamber Of Commerce | ** Against | |
| California Asian Pacific Chamber Of Commerce | ** Against | |
| California Children'S Hospital Association | ** Support | |
| California Dental Association | ** Support | |
| California Department of Justice | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| California Distributors Association | * Indeterminate | Apr 9, 2024 |
| California Fuels And Convenience Alliance | ** Against | |
| California Hispanic Chambers Of Commerce | ** Against | |
| California Medical Association | ** Support | |
| California School Nurses Organization | ** Support | |
| California Taxpayers Association | * Indeterminate | Apr 9, 2024 |
| Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids | ** Support | |
| Cigar Association Of America | * Support | Jun 26, 2024 |
| City of Alameda | ** Support | |
| cleanearth4kids.org | ** Support | |
| County Health Executives Association Of California | ** Support | |
| County Of Alameda | * Support | Jul 2, 2024 |
| County of Santa Clara | ** Support | |
| Eco-Sustainability Peeps | * Support | Jun 26, 2024 |
| First 5 Mendocino | ** Support | |
| International Youth Tobacco Control | ** Support | |
| Kaiser Permanante | * Support | Jun 26, 2024 |
| Mendocino County Tobacco Prevention Coalition | ** Support | |
| North County Equity & Justice | * Support | Jun 26, 2024 |
| San Diego City Attorney Mara W. Elliott | ** Support | |
| San Diego City Attorney's Office | ** Support | |
| san francisco marin medical society | ** Support | |
| Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors | * Support | Jul 2, 2024 |
| The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition | ** Support | |
| Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee | ** Support |
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA1 Bill Id:AB 3218
Author:(Wood)
As Amended Ver:August 23, 2024
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Requires the Attorney General (AG), no later than December 31, 2025, to establish and maintain on the AG's website, a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL). Requires each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. Requires a manufacturer or importer that submits a product to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, and describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sought and its status, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to charge a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style.
Senate Amendments
- Prohibit a wholesaler or delivery seller from selling a tobacco product not listed on the UTL or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in California;
- Delete the provision deeming certain tobacco products possessed in violation of the provision of this bill from being forfeited to the state;
- Authorize the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) or a law enforcement agency that discovers that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or enhancers to seize those products; and,
- Update the definition of cigarette for purposes of existing law authorizing the delivery sale of cigarettes or tobacco products, and require a deliver seller to comply with any applicable state law or local ordinance that imposes restrictions on the retail sale of cigarettes or tobacco products directly to the public from a retail location as if the deliver sale occurred entirely within the state and place.
COMMENTS
Cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the United States (U.S.), or nearly one in five deaths. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the following causes combined: Human immunodeficiency virus, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm-related incidents. More than 10 times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the U.S.
California's flavored tobacco ban. In 2020 the Legislature passed, and Governor Newsom signed, SB 793 (Hill), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020. The law prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. It exempts the sale of Hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars from the prohibition. Fueled by kid friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, 3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018. The disturbing rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019 with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors and there are now 5.3 million young Americans who use e-cigarettes regularly. SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original FDA ban, because, as the author of SB 793 noted during his bill presentation, unless action is taken, an estimated 1.6 million African Americans alive today, who are now under the age of 18, will become regular smokers; and about 500,000 of those will die prematurely from a tobacco-related disease.
Immediately after the passage of SB 793, the tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether or not SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. The next day, R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products filed a federal lawsuit challenging California's ban on flavored tobacco. However, in December of 2022 the Supreme Court refused to block the law, clearing the way for the ban to take effect the next week. The law states that a tobacco retailer, or agent or employee of a tobacco retailer, in violation of this section is guilty of an infraction and will be punished by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each violation. This law does not specify where the enforcement authority of this statute resides, which implies local jurisdictions have authority to enforce this law.
Grandfathered tobacco products. Generally, to be legally marketed in the U.S., federal law requires "new tobacco products" to have a premarket authorization order in effect. A "new tobacco product" is any tobacco product that was not commercially marketed in the U.S. as of February 15, 2007, or any modified tobacco product that was commercially marketed after February 15, 2007. A marketing authorization is required for a new tobacco product unless: 1) the manufacturer of the product submitted a report and FDA issues an order finding the product substantially equivalent to a predicate tobacco product; or, 2) the manufacturer submitted a report and all modifications are covered by exemptions from the requirements of substantial equivalence granted by FDA. The FDA deems new tobacco products without required marketing authorization as adulterated and misbranded.
This bill would allow the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order. Although the FDA has only authorized 23 tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes to date, there are thousands of flavored and arguably flavored tobacco products that remain available for retail sale in California despite lacking FDA authorization. Many of the unauthorized products are labeled "clear" or ambiguously branded with flavor concepts (i.e. "Blue" instead of "Blueberry") in order to avoid flavor bans.
Benefits of an UTL. According to an October 2019 DPH whitepaper, "Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions," a non-flavored list, which includes all tobacco products that may be sold in a particular jurisdiction, has several substantial benefits. First, developing, maintaining and using a non-flavored list is significantly easier than a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier; unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. Further, California's non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level.
According to the Author
Children who use tobacco, use flavored tobacco products. The author notes that market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, have no business in California and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. The author concludes that this bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the AG to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
Arguments in Support
AG Rob Bonta is the sponsor of this bill and states that under current law, the flavored tobacco ban prohibits the retail sale of flavored tobacco products. Despite the ban, these products are still being sold in California and are ending up in the hands of young people. Tobacco companies make and market flavored tobacco products, which come with high nicotine content in a myriad of kid-friendly flavors. Young people are predominately the consumers of these products, and the usage among youth has increased rapidly in recent years, specifically among middle school students. A 2023 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that among middle school and high school students who currently use e-cigarettes, nearly nine in 10 use flavored e-cigarettes. The AG notes that without strict enforcement in this market, noncompliant sellers provide easy access to flavored tobacco products, and this bill would hold noncompliant sellers accountable and reduce the availability of flavored tobacco products.
Arguments in Opposition
The American Petroleum & Convenience Store Association (APCSA) is opposed to this bill unless it is amended and states that California does not need another tobacco related proposal after voters upheld the statewide flavor ban in November of 2022, which has been in effect since December of 2022. Additionally, in 2023, California passed and enacted AB 935, which is an enforcement bill specifically designed to enforce the flavor ban. APCSA contends that what the state needs to do is simply enforce their existing laws instead of adding new regulations. APCSA concludes that because of already minimal enforcement to date on illicit products, this bill may only serve to exacerbate the illicit market on all tobacco products.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
- Unknown ongoing costs for the Department of Justice for workload, including: preparing UTL emergency regulations and forms; making determinations of eligibility for the UTL; coordinating with industry stakeholders on compliance and determinations; coordinating with other state agencies regarding the UTL; receiving and processing applications for listing on the UTL; tracking administrative fees and costs; and information technology support (California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund and Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund).
- Unknown costs for CDTFA related to the enforcement workload for tracking, calculation, billing, and collection of the costs for the destruction of products from licensed retailers. Costs would be offset by penalties deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund.
- Unknown revenue loss to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Fund, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund.
VOTES:
ASM HEALTH: 12-0-4
YES: Bonta, Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Wendy Carrillo, Haney, Jones-Sawyer, Maienschein, McCarty, Rodriguez, Santiago, Schiavo, Weber
ABS, ABST OR NV: Waldron, Flora, Joe Patterson, Sanchez
ASM JUDICIARY: 10-0-2
YES: Kalra, Dixon, Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Haney, Maienschein, McKinnor, Pacheco, Reyes
ABS, ABST OR NV: Sanchez, Waldron
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-1-3
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Mike Fong, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Pellerin, Villapudua
NO: Dixon
ABS, ABST OR NV: Sanchez, Jim Patterson, Ta
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 55-4-21
YES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Connolly, Mike Fong, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Santiago, Schiavo, Ting, Valencia, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NO: Dixon, Essayli, Vince Fong, Gallagher
ABS, ABST OR NV: Alanis, Cervantes, Chen, Megan Dahle, Davies, Flora, Friedman, Gabriel, Holden, Hoover, Lackey, Mathis, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Luz Rivas, Sanchez, Soria, Ta, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis
SENATE FLOOR: 30-7-3
YES: Allen, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener, Wilk
NO: Dahle, Grove, Jones, Min, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto
ABS, ABST OR NV: Bradford, Caballero, Nguyen
UPDATED
VERSION: August 23, 2024
CONSULTANT: Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0004173
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 3218 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 3218
Author: Wood (D), et al.
Amended: 8/23/24 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 9-1, 6/26/24
AYES: Roth, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Limón, Menjivar, Rubio, Smallwood-Cuevas, Wiener
NOES: Grove
NO VOTE RECORDED: Nguyen
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 10-1, 7/2/24
AYES: Umberg, Wilk, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Roth, Stern, Wahab
NOES: Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 4-2, 8/15/24
AYES: Caballero, Ashby, Becker, Wahab
NOES: Jones, Seyarto
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bradford
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 55-4, 5/21/24 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Unflavored Tobacco List
SOURCE: Attorney General Rob Bonta
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network
American Heart Association
American Lung Association of California
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids
DIGEST:
This bill requires the California Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Permits the AG to deny inclusion of a tobacco product on the UTL.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/23/24 add double jointing language in order to avoid chaptering out issues with SB 1230 (Rubio), which increase civil penalties for tobacco law violations and require flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to be seized from retail locations—similar provisions in this bill.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Requires the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), in order to prevent tobacco-related diseases and diminish tobacco use, to establish a program to reduce tobacco use in California by conducting health education interventions and behavior change programs at the state level, in the community, and other non-school settings. Requires CDPH to conduct statewide surveillance of tobacco-related behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes, and evaluate its local and state tobacco control programs. [HSC §104375]
- Establishes the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, which requires retailers, wholesalers, and distributors to be licensed in California to sell cigarettes or tobacco products. Authorizes any peace officer, or California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) employee granted limited peace officer status, upon presenting appropriate credentials, to enter any specified place to conduct inspections. [BPC §22970, et seq.]
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. Provides there is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturer’s agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a “characterizing flavor.” [HSC §104559.5]
- Requires the AG to develop and publish on its website the California Tobacco Directory, which is required to list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with law regarding the use of stamps and meter impressions and the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) entered into by California and leading U.S. tobacco product manufacturers, as specified. [RTC §30165.1]
This bill:
- Requires the AG to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires the AG to publish the UTL by December 31, 2025. Requires any “brand style” not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Defines “brand style” as a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, “nicotine” content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification. Defines “nicotine” as any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a “characterizing flavor.” Expands the definition of “characterizing flavor” in existing law to also include, among the list of various flavors, a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
- Permits the AG to deem each submission to be a request to have the brand style included on the UTL. Requires any of these submissions to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category, including, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs;
- Describes, for each brand style, whether a formal authorization, approval, or order from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sought and, if so, the status of the request; and,
- Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon the request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor, as well as additional information and documentation regarding tobacco product status, packaging, or marketing of a brand style. Requires all this information to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires the AG to consider, in determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor, among other factors, the information from the manufacturer or importer regarding the brand style. Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Permits this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission to submit updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports a brand style listed on the UTL, or when that brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style to be included on the UTL to do all of the following:
- Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of the provisions in this bill and of any promulgated regulations;
- Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- Identify the registered agent to the AG; and,
- Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce the provisions of this bill or regulations.
- Permits the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit a list of all brand styles that they manufacture or import.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer to submit an initial application fee, and for the AG to collect an annual renewal fee, of up $1,000 per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the AG for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. Requires the fees to be deposited into the California UTL Fund, which this bill creates, be continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the AG.
- Requires the AG to decline to include, and to remove, any brand style on the UTL that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor, or that is adulterated, misbranded, or otherwise required to obtain, but has not received, a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FDA. Makes removal of a brand style effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice. Permits a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials within 30 days of the notice of removal, which will also be deemed confidential.
- Permits a manufacturer or importer that certified the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or declined inclusion on the list, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law, and providing additional materials. Prohibits the filing of the petition from staying the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Permits the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000 and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits a distributor or wholesaler from selling any tobacco product not on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Permits the AG to assess civil penalties for each tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation against the distributor, wholesaler, or delivery seller as follows:
- No more than $2,000 for the first violation;
- No more than $3,500 for the second violation;
- No more than $5,000 for the third violation within a five-year period;
- No more than $6,500 for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
- No more than $10,000 for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Prohibits a delivery seller from selling a tobacco product not on the UTL or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in this state. Specifies that this provision does not apply to the sale of tobacco products by a distributor or wholesaler to a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, or any other person that the state is prohibited from regulating under the Unites States Constitution or other laws, or the California Constitution.
- Permits CDTFA or a law enforcement agency, upon discovery by either entity, that a retailer or wholesaler possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers—in violation of the prohibition of flavored tobacco in this state—to seize those items from the retailer or wholesaler.
- Requires any seized items by a law enforcement agency to be delivered to CDTFA or its designee within 30 days unless the seized items are required to be destroyed, or are otherwise required to be used as evidence.
- Requires CDTFA also to issue a civil penalty against the retailer or wholesaler equal to $50 per individual package of those items. Requires CDTFA to suspend the license of the retailer or wholesaler in the case of a second seizure of those prohibited items. Requires CDTFA to revoke the license of the retailer or wholesaler in the case of a third seizure of those items. Requires these civil penalties to be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund. Specifies that this Fund, in addition to implementing, enforcing, and administering the California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, includes supporting the seizure and destruction of cigarettes and tobacco products.
- Requires all of the following to apply when CDTFA discovers that a distributor, wholesaler, or other person made a sale in violation of the UTL provisions in this bill, and for wholesalers when neither CDTFA or a law enforcement agency seizes its flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers:
- Upon a first offense, CDTFA issues a warning notice to the entities;
- Upon a second offense, CDTFA suspends an entity’s license; and,
- Upon a third offense, CDTFA revokes an entity’s license.
- Requires the court, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce the provisions of this bill, to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action. Requires awards to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Permits the AG to adopt rules and regulations deemed necessary to implement the provisions of this bill, including any further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations, requiring reporting of delivery sales of tobacco products, and constitutionally exempted distributions of flavored tobacco products, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Deems regulations as emergency regulations to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law as necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- Specifies that the provisions of this bill do not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Add double jointing language in order to avoid chaptering out issues with SB 1230 (Rubio).
- Makes findings and declarations regarding the imposition of a limitation on the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies, including information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG, which is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
Comments
- Author’s statement. According to the author, “despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco use flavored tobacco products. Market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, has no business in California, and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. This bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the Attorney General to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.”
- Letter of concern. Cigar Association of America (CAA) is strongly supportive of creating a statewide UTL as a tool to combat the widespread sale of tobacco products across California that are either flavored, illegal under federal law, or both. CAA argues that while the stated purpose of this bill is to improve enforcement against the sale of illegal flavored tobacco products in California, in reality this bill is being used as a vehicle for the AG to acquire broad and unprecedented new authority to regulate and ban legal unflavored tobacco products. CAA was encouraged when the AG sponsored this bill to create a UTL to improve statewide enforcement of the flavored tobacco ban. Once created, the UTL will greatly simplify the job of local law enforcement by providing them with a list of specific tobacco products that can legally be sold in California. CAA says under the authority given in this bill, the AG may decide to block a particular brand of cigar from being included on the UTL despite the fact that it is unflavored and legal to sell pursuant to FDA regulation. This decision could be made for any reason at all, whether motivated by a legitimate concern or a political one. CAA says then consider the local retailer who is offering this particular cigar for sale knowing that the manufacturer has stated it complies with federal law and is an unflavored tobacco product pursuant to California law. A law enforcement officer then visits this retailer to perform a routine inspection, relying on the UTL as the definitive resource for products that can legally be sold in California. The officer sees this particular cigar for sale on the store shelf and checks it against the UTL only to find that it isn’t listed. Under this bill, the officer then seizes and destroys the retailer’s inventory of that cigar and cites the retailer who must now pay a fine and is placed at risk of losing their tobacco license—for selling a legal and unflavored cigar that happened to be arbitrarily excluded from the UTL. CAA also shares the concern of the opposition regarding the expanded definition of “characterizing flavor.” CAA urges the correction of these critical flaws.
[For a more extensive analysis, see the Senate Health Committee analysis stored on June 24, 2024.]
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to Senate Appropriations Committee:
- The Department of Justice estimates costs of $318,000 in 2024-25 and $603,000 ongoing thereafter for workload, including: preparing UTL emergency regulations and forms; making determinations of eligibility for the UTL; coordinating with industry stakeholders on compliance and determinations; coordinating with other state agencies regarding the UTL; receiving and processing applications for listing on the UTL; tracking administrative fees and costs; and information technology support (California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund and Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund).
- The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) estimates the following:
- Costs ranging from $10,000-$50,000 related to the workload for tracking, calculation, billing, and collection of the costs for the destruction of products from licensed retailers. CDTFA estimates additional costs ranging from $250,001 to over $1 million for destruction depending on the amount and type of tax-paid flavored cigarettes and tobacco products seized. Under the bill, costs would be reimbursed by the persons from whom the property was seized.
- Unknown revenue loss to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Fund, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund, since distributors would be prohibited from stamping flavored cigarettes or paying tax on flavored tobacco products not on the UTL or selling/distributing those products to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California.
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/13/24)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (co-source)
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (co-source)
American Heart Association (co-source)
American Lung Association of California (co-source)
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids (co-source)
Alameda County Board of Supervisors
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Children's Hospital Association
California Dental Association
California Medical Association
California School Nurses Organization
City of Alameda
Cleanearth4kids.org
County Health Executives Association of California
County of Santa Clara
First 5 Mendocino
International Youth Tobacco Control
Mendocino County Tobacco Prevention Coalition
San Diego City Attorney Mara W. Elliott
San Francisco Marin Medical Society
The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition
Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/13/24)
American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association
California African American Chamber of Commerce
California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce
California Fuels and Convenience Alliance
California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, and the American Lung Association state they were cosponsors of SB 793, which was critical to reducing youth tobacco use since eight out of 10 youth who have ever used tobacco started with a flavored product. However, like any law, it can only be effective if fully enforced, and this bill will provide necessary enhancements to the enforcement of California’s flavored tobacco restriction. Supporters argue despite losing both at the Legislature and the ballot box, the tobacco industry has shown time and again they will do whatever they can to keep kid-friendly and candy-flavored tobacco products on the shelves of California retailers to hook the next generation on their deadly products. Without further action to enhance enforcement of SB 793, the tobacco industry will continue targeting and addicting kids, Black Americans, and other groups with flavored products, even violating the law to do so. Illegal flavored e-cigarettes as well as menthol-like cigarettes designed to replicate traditional menthol cigarettes continue to proliferate at California tobacco retailers. Supporters say this bill will place the burden of proof on the tobacco industry to show a product belongs on the UTL. Supporters further argue data from the CDC Foundation show that while sales of flavored e-cigarettes have declined by 70% since implementation of SB 793, over one-third of e-cigarette sales in California are still for prohibited, flavored e-cigarettes. While the proportion of California youth and young adult tobacco users who report that it is easy to access flavored tobacco products in retail stores has declined since the ban, over 70% still believe it is easy to access these products. It is clear that more work is needed to enforce this law. Supporters state that over 90% of California high school e-cigarette users report using flavored e-cigarettes, so enforcing this rule is critical to ending this public health crisis.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: The California Fuels and Convenience Alliance (CFCA) continues to be concerned with the broad discretion given to the AG to further prohibit legal products in the state based on a subjective determination of a “characterizing flavor.” CFCA argues as they have continued to see with the implementation of SB 793, the flavor tobacco ban has not reduced consumption of these products and has only benefited bad actors in the illicit marketplace. According to the Peace Officers’ Research Association of California, 43% of cigarettes smoked in California are smuggled in from lower-tax areas out of state. Bans have not ended the sale of flavored tobacco in California, only merely shifting the location of their sale. CFCA says where previously flavored tobacco was sold in well-regulated, licensed stores with a stake in their community, now flavored tobacco products are sold by unscrupulous actors from primarily overseas, to individuals of all ages with little regulatory enforcement. CFCA says it is essential for California to get the existing flavored tobacco ban right, rather than adding more complexity. CFCA further argues that modifying the definition to capture products with a “cooling” sensation creates further uncertainty as to which products are allowed to be sold. CFCA requests this bill be amended to remove “cooling” from the definition of “characterizing flavor”. The California Asian Pacific, Hispanic, and African American Chambers of Commerce echo the concern about the inclusion of “cooling,” and oppose unless this bill is amended to address that concern.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 55-4, 5/21/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Connolly, Mike Fong, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Santiago, Schiavo, Ting, Valencia, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NOES: Dixon, Essayli, Vince Fong, Gallagher
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alanis, Cervantes, Chen, Megan Dahle, Davies, Flora, Friedman, Gabriel, Holden, Hoover, Lackey, Mathis, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Luz Rivas, Sanchez, Soria, Ta, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis
Prepared by: Reyes Diaz / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111
8/25/24 13:36:01
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 3218 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 3218
Author: Wood (D), et al.
Amended: 8/15/24 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 9-1, 6/26/24
AYES: Roth, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Limón, Menjivar, Rubio, Smallwood-Cuevas, Wiener
NOES: Grove
NO VOTE RECORDED: Nguyen
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 10-1, 7/2/24
AYES: Umberg, Wilk, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Roth, Stern, Wahab
NOES: Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 4-2, 8/15/24
AYES: Caballero, Ashby, Becker, Wahab
NOES: Jones, Seyarto
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bradford
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 55-4, 5/21/24 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Unflavored Tobacco List
SOURCE: Attorney General Rob Bonta
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network
American Heart Association
American Lung Association of California
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids
DIGEST:
This bill requires the California Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Permits the AG to deny inclusion of a tobacco product on the UTL.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Requires the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), in order to prevent tobacco-related diseases and diminish tobacco use, to establish a program to reduce tobacco use in California by conducting health education interventions and behavior change programs at the state level, in the community, and other non-school settings. Requires CDPH to conduct statewide surveillance of tobacco-related behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes, and evaluate its local and state tobacco control programs. [HSC §104375]
- Establishes the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, which requires retailers, wholesalers, and distributors to be licensed in California to sell cigarettes or tobacco products. Authorizes any peace officer, or California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) employee granted limited peace officer status, upon presenting appropriate credentials, to enter any specified place to conduct inspections. [BPC §22970, et seq.]
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. Provides there is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturer’s agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a “characterizing flavor.” [HSC §104559.5]
- Requires the AG to develop and publish on its website the California Tobacco Directory, which is required to list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with law regarding the use of stamps and meter impressions and the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) entered into by California and leading U.S. tobacco product manufacturers, as specified. [RTC §30165.1]
This bill:
- Requires the AG to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires the AG to publish the UTL by December 31, 2025. Requires any “brand style” not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Defines “brand style” as a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, “nicotine” content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification. Defines “nicotine” as any form of the chemical nicotine, including any salt or complex, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived, and includes nicotinic alkaloids and nicotine analogs.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a “characterizing flavor.” Expands the definition of “characterizing flavor” in existing law to also include, among the list of various flavors, a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
- Permits the AG to deem each submission to be a request to have the brand style included on the UTL. Requires any of these submissions to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category, including, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs;
- Describes, for each brand style, whether a formal authorization, approval, or order from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sought and, if so, the status of the request; and,
- Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon the request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor, as well as additional information and documentation regarding tobacco product status, packaging, or marketing of a brand style. Requires all this information to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires the AG to consider, in determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor, among other factors, the information from the manufacturer or importer regarding the brand style. Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Permits this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission to submit updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports a brand style listed on the UTL, or when that brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a brand style to be included on the UTL to do all of the following:
- Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of the provisions in this bill and of any promulgated regulations;
- Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- Identify the registered agent to the AG; and,
- Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce the provisions of this bill or regulations.
- Permits the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit a list of all brand styles that they manufacture or import.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer to submit an initial application fee, and for the AG to collect an annual renewal fee, of up $1,000 per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the AG for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. Requires the fees to be deposited into the California UTL Fund, which this bill creates, be continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the AG.
- Requires the AG to decline to include, and to remove, any brand style on the UTL that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor, or that is adulterated, misbranded, or otherwise required to obtain, but has not received, a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FDA. Makes removal of a brand style effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice. Permits a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials within 30 days of the notice of removal, which will also be deemed confidential.
- Permits a manufacturer or importer that certified the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or declined inclusion on the list, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law, and providing additional materials. Prohibits the filing of the petition from staying the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Permits the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000 and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits a distributor or wholesaler from selling any tobacco product not on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Permits the AG to assess civil penalties for each tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation against the distributor, wholesaler, or delivery seller as follows:
- No more than $2,000 for the first violation;
- No more than $3,500 for the second violation;
- No more than $5,000 for the third violation within a five-year period;
- No more than $6,500 for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
- No more than $10,000 for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Prohibits a delivery seller from selling a tobacco product not on the UTL or a tobacco product flavor enhancer to a consumer in this state. Specifies that this provision does not apply to the sale of tobacco products by a distributor or wholesaler to a retailer, wholesaler, distributor, or any other person that the state is prohibited from regulating under the Unites States Constitution or other laws, or the California Constitution.
- Permits CDTFA or a law enforcement agency, upon discovery by either entity, that a retailer or wholesaler possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers—in violation of the prohibition of flavored tobacco in this state—to seize those items from the retailer or wholesaler.
- Requires any seized items by a law enforcement agency to be delivered to CDTFA or its designee within 30 days unless the seized items are required to be destroyed, or are otherwise required to be used as evidence.
- Requires CDTFA also to issue a civil penalty against the retailer or wholesaler equal to $50 per individual package of those items. Requires CDTFA to suspend the license of the retailer or wholesaler in the case of a second seizure of those prohibited items. Requires CDTFA to revoke the license of the retailer or wholesaler in the case of a third seizure of those items. Requires these civil penalties to be deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund. Specifies that this Fund, in addition to implementing, enforcing, and administering the California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, includes supporting the seizure and destruction of cigarettes and tobacco products.
- Requires all of the following to apply when CDTFA discovers that a distributor, wholesaler, or other person made a sale in violation of the UTL provisions in this bill, and for wholesalers when neither CDTFA or a law enforcement agency seizes its flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers:
- Upon a first offense, CDTFA issues a warning notice to the entities;
- Upon a second offense, CDTFA suspends an entity’s license; and,
- Upon a third offense, CDTFA revokes an entity’s license.
- Requires the court, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce the provisions of this bill, to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action. Requires awards to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Permits the AG to adopt rules and regulations deemed necessary to implement the provisions of this bill, including any further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations, requiring reporting of delivery sales of tobacco products, and constitutionally exempted distributions of flavored tobacco products, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Deems regulations as emergency regulations to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law as necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- Specifies that the provisions of this bill do not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Makes findings and declarations regarding the imposition of a limitation on the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies, including information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG, which is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
Comments
- Author’s statement. According to the author, despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco use flavored tobacco products. Market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, has no business in California, and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. This bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the Attorney General to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
- Letter of concern. Cigar Association of America (CAA) is strongly supportive of creating a statewide UTL as a tool to combat the widespread sale of tobacco products across California that are either flavored, illegal under federal law, or both. CAA argues that while the stated purpose of this bill is to improve enforcement against the sale of illegal flavored tobacco products in California, in reality this bill is being used as a vehicle for the AG to acquire broad and unprecedented new authority to regulate and ban legal unflavored tobacco products. CAA was encouraged when the AG sponsored this bill to create a UTL to improve statewide enforcement of the flavored tobacco ban. Once created, the UTL will greatly simplify the job of local law enforcement by providing them with a list of specific tobacco products that can legally be sold in California. CAA says under the authority given in this bill, the AG may decide to block a particular brand of cigar from being included on the UTL despite the fact that it is unflavored and legal to sell pursuant to FDA regulation. This decision could be made for any reason at all, whether motivated by a legitimate concern or a political one. CAA says then consider the local retailer who is offering this particular cigar for sale knowing that the manufacturer has stated it complies with federal law and is an unflavored tobacco product pursuant to California law. A law enforcement officer then visits this retailer to perform a routine inspection, relying on the UTL as the definitive resource for products that can legally be sold in California. The officer sees this particular cigar for sale on the store shelf and checks it against the UTL only to find that it isn’t listed. Under this bill, the officer then seizes and destroys the retailer’s inventory of that cigar and cites the retailer who must now pay a fine and is placed at risk of losing their tobacco license—for selling a legal and unflavored cigar that happened to be arbitrarily excluded from the UTL. CAA also shares the concern of the opposition regarding the expanded definition of “characterizing flavor.” CAA urges the correction of these critical flaws.
[For a more extensive analysis, see the Senate Health Committee analysis stored on June 24, 2024.]
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to Senate Appropriations Committee:
- The Department of Justice estimates costs of $318,000 in 2024-25 and $603,000 ongoing thereafter for workload, including: preparing UTL emergency regulations and forms; making determinations of eligibility for the UTL; coordinating with industry stakeholders on compliance and determinations; coordinating with other state agencies regarding the UTL; receiving and processing applications for listing on the UTL; tracking administrative fees and costs; and information technology support (California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund and Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund).
- The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) estimates the following:
- Costs ranging from $10,000-$50,000 related to the workload for tracking, calculation, billing, and collection of the costs for the destruction of products from licensed retailers. CDTFA estimates additional costs ranging from $250,001 to over $1 million for destruction depending on the amount and type of tax-paid flavored cigarettes and tobacco products seized. Under the bill, costs would be reimbursed by the persons from whom the property was seized.
- Unknown revenue loss to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Fund, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund, since distributors would be prohibited from stamping flavored cigarettes or paying tax on flavored tobacco products not on the UTL or selling/distributing those products to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California.
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/13/24)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (co-source)
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (co-source)
American Heart Association (co-source)
American Lung Association of California (co-source)
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids (co-source)
Alameda County Board of Supervisors
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Children's Hospital Association
California Dental Association
California Medical Association
California School Nurses Organization
City of Alameda
Cleanearth4kids.org
County Health Executives Association of California
County of Santa Clara
First 5 Mendocino
International Youth Tobacco Control
Mendocino County Tobacco Prevention Coalition
San Diego City Attorney Mara W. Elliott
San Francisco Marin Medical Society
The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition
Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/13/24)
American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association
California African American Chamber of Commerce
California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce
California Fuels and Convenience Alliance
California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, and the American Lung Association state they were cosponsors of SB 793, which was critical to reducing youth tobacco use since eight out of 10 youth who have ever used tobacco started with a flavored product. However, like any law, it can only be effective if fully enforced, and this bill will provide necessary enhancements to the enforcement of California’s flavored tobacco restriction. Supporters argue despite losing both at the Legislature and the ballot box, the tobacco industry has shown time and again they will do whatever they can to keep kid-friendly and candy-flavored tobacco products on the shelves of California retailers to hook the next generation on their deadly products. Without further action to enhance enforcement of SB 793, the tobacco industry will continue targeting and addicting kids, Black Americans, and other groups with flavored products, even violating the law to do so. Illegal flavored e-cigarettes as well as menthol-like cigarettes designed to replicate traditional menthol cigarettes continue to proliferate at California tobacco retailers. Supporters say this bill will place the burden of proof on the tobacco industry to show a product belongs on the UTL. Supporters further argue data from the CDC Foundation show that while sales of flavored e-cigarettes have declined by 70% since implementation of SB 793, over one-third of e-cigarette sales in California are still for prohibited, flavored e-cigarettes. While the proportion of California youth and young adult tobacco users who report that it is easy to access flavored tobacco products in retail stores has declined since the ban, over 70% still believe it is easy to access these products. It is clear that more work is needed to enforce this law. Supporters state that over 90% of California high school e-cigarette users report using flavored e-cigarettes, so enforcing this rule is critical to ending this public health crisis.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: The California Fuels and Convenience Alliance (CFCA) continues to be concerned with the broad discretion given to the AG to further prohibit legal products in the state based on a subjective determination of a “characterizing flavor.” CFCA argues as they have continued to see with the implementation of SB 793, the flavor tobacco ban has not reduced consumption of these products and has only benefited bad actors in the illicit marketplace. According to the Peace Officers’ Research Association of California, 43% of cigarettes smoked in California are smuggled in from lower-tax areas out of state. Bans have not ended the sale of flavored tobacco in California, only merely shifting the location of their sale. CFCA says where previously flavored tobacco was sold in well-regulated, licensed stores with a stake in their community, now flavored tobacco products are sold by unscrupulous actors from primarily overseas, to individuals of all ages with little regulatory enforcement. CFCA says it is essential for California to get the existing flavored tobacco ban right, rather than adding more complexity. CFCA further argues that modifying the definition to capture products with a “cooling” sensation creates further uncertainty as to which products are allowed to be sold. CFCA requests this bill be amended to remove “cooling” from the definition of “characterizing flavor”. The California Asian Pacific, Hispanic, and African American Chambers of Commerce echo the concern about the inclusion of “cooling,” and oppose unless this bill is amended to address that concern.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 55-4, 5/21/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Connolly, Mike Fong, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Santiago, Schiavo, Ting, Valencia, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NOES: Dixon, Essayli, Vince Fong, Gallagher
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alanis, Cervantes, Chen, Megan Dahle, Davies, Flora, Friedman, Gabriel, Holden, Hoover, Lackey, Mathis, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Luz Rivas, Sanchez, Soria, Ta, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis
Prepared by: Reyes Diaz / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111
8/19/24 12:46:46
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
Senator Anna Caballero, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular Session
AB 3218 (Wood) - Unflavored Tobacco List
Version: | Policy Vote: |
Urgency: | Mandate: |
Hearing Date: | Consultant: |
Bill Summary:
AB 3218 would require the Attorney General to establish and maintain a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
*********** ANALYSIS ADDENDUM – SUSPENSE FILE ***********
The following information is revised to reflect amendments
adopted by the committee on August 15, 2024
Fiscal Impact:
- Unknown ongoing costs for the Department of Justice for workload, including: preparing UTL emergency regulations and forms; making determinations of eligibility for the UTL; coordinating with industry stakeholders on compliance and determinations; coordinating with other state agencies regarding the UTL; receiving and processing applications for listing on the UTL; tracking administrative fees and costs; and information technology support (California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund and Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund).
- Unknown costs for the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) related to the enforcement workload for tracking, calculation, billing, and collection of the costs for the destruction of products. from licensed retailers. Costs would be offset by penalties deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund.
- Unknown revenue loss to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Fund, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund.
Author Amendments:
Shift enforcement from the Revenue and Taxation Code to the Business and Professions Code:
- Upon discovery by the CDTFA or a law enforcement agency that a retailer possesses, stores, owns, or has made a retail sale of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, in violation of existing law, the CDTFA or the law enforcement agency may seize the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers at the retail location or any other person’s location.
- Require any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by a law enforcement agency to be delivered to the CDTFA, or its designee, within 30 days, unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers must be destroyed by that law enforcement agency, or unless the seized flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers are otherwise required to be used as evidence in an administrative, criminal, or civil proceeding, or as part of an ongoing law enforcement operation.
- Require that any flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers seized by the CDTFA or delivered to the CDTFA by a law enforcement agency must be deemed forfeited to the state.
- Require that in addition to seizure and forfeiture of the flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, the CDTFA must issue a civil penalty against the retailer equal to $50 per individual package of flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor enhancer seized or delivered to the CDTFA by a law enforcement agency regardless of the authority used by the law enforcement agency to seize the flavored tobacco product or tobacco product flavor; require civil penalties to be deposited into the existing Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund; and provide that moneys from the fund may be used for activities related to the seizure and destruction of cigarettes and tobacco products.
- In the case of a second seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, the CDTFA must suspend the license of the retailer; and in the case of a third seizure and forfeiture of flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers, the CDTFA must revoke the license of the retailer.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Anna Caballero, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular Session
AB 3218 (Wood) - Unflavored Tobacco List
Version: June 27, 2024 | Policy Vote: HEALTH 9 - 1, JUD. 10 - 1 |
Urgency: No | Mandate: Yes |
Hearing Date: August 5, 2024 | Consultant: Agnes Lee |
Bill Summary:
AB 3218 would require the Attorney General to establish and maintain a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
Fiscal Impact:
- The Department of Justice estimates costs of $318,000 in 2024-25 and $603,000 ongoing thereafter for workload, including: preparing UTL emergency regulations and forms; making determinations of eligibility for the UTL; coordinating with industry stakeholders on compliance and determinations; coordinating with other state agencies regarding the UTL; receiving and processing applications for listing on the UTL; tracking administrative fees and costs; and information technology support (California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund and Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund).
- The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) estimates the following:
- Costs ranging from $10,000-$50,000 related to the workload for tracking, calculation, billing, and collection of the costs for the destruction of products from licensed retailers. CDTFA estimates additional costs ranging from $250,001 to over $1 million for destruction depending on the amount and type of tax-paid flavored cigarettes and tobacco products seized. Under the bill, costs would be reimbursed by the persons from whom the property was seized.
- Unknown revenue loss to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Fund, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund, since distributors would be prohibited from stamping flavored cigarettes or paying tax on flavored tobacco products not on the UTL or selling/distributing those products to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California.
Background:
Current law prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. Current law defines “characterizing flavor” as a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product, including, but not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice.
Current law requires the Attorney General to develop and publish on its website the California Tobacco Directory, which is required to list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with law regarding the use of stamps and meter impressions and the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) entered into by California and leading U.S. tobacco product manufacturers, as specified. A CDTFA employee, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, may enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the MSA. Current law provides that certain tobacco products, upon seizure by CDTFA, be forfeited to the state.
Proposed Law:
Specific provisions of the bill would:
- Require the Attorney General to establish and maintain on the Attorney General’s internet website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, as defined, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL).
- Require every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products to submit to the Attorney General a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor.
- Require the Attorney General to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the Attorney General reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor; and authorize the Attorney General to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated or misbranded or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
- Provide that a person cannot affix, or cause to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
- Authorize the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000 and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the Attorney General that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibit a distributor from selling any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California; and authorize the Attorney General to assess civil penalties, as specified.
- Require every manufacturer and importer submission to be accompanied by an initial application fee of up to $1,000 per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the Attorney General for processing the submissions and operating the UTL; and require the Attorney General to collect an annual renewal fee of up to $1,000 per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of maintaining the UTL, to offset the costs associated with operating the UTL.
- Require that application and renewal fees be deposited into a newly established California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund, continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the office of the Attorney General for the purpose of processing the submissions and operating the UTL.
- Require that upon seizure by the CDFTA, cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of these provisions, is forfeited to the state; require the cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state to be destroyed; and require that the person from whom the property was seized is liable for the cost of the destruction of property.
Related Legislation: AB 598 (R. Rivas, 2021) was similar to this bill. The bill was not heard in any committee.
-- END --
Senator Thomas Umberg, Chair
2023-2024 Regular Session
Bill No: AB 3218 (Author:Wood)
Version: June 27, 2024
Hearing Date: July 2, 2024
Fiscal: Yes
Urgency: No
Consultant: AM
SUBJECT
Unflavored Tobacco List
DIGEST
This bill requires the Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). The bill deems any brand style not on the UTL to be a flavored tobacco product, and therefore banned in this state. The bill authorizes the AG to deny inclusion of a tobacco product on the UTL, as provided.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2020, SB 793 (Hill, Ch. 34; Stats. 2020) was enacted into law and prohibited a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, with certain exceptions. The statute did not become operative for over two years due to a referendum and subsequent litigation. This bill seeks to bolster SB 793 by requiring the AG to establish and maintain the UTL. The bill, among other things, authorizes the AG to seek injunctive relief and civil penalties against any manufacturer that certifies a brand lacks a characterizing flavor, but the AG determines otherwise. The bill is sponsored by Attorney General Rob Bonta and is supported by numerous public health organizations. The bill is opposed by the California Fuels and Convenience Alliance. The bill passed the Senate Health Committee on a vote of 9 to 1.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE LAW
Existing law:
- Pursuant to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, requires the Board of Equalization (BOE) to license all entities engaged in the sale of cigarettes and tobacco products in California. (Bus. & Prof. Code § 22970 et seq.)
- Requires the California Department of Health (CDPH) to establish and develop a program to reduce the availability of “tobacco products” to persons under 21 years of age through authorized enforcement activities pursuant to the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act (STAKE Act). (Bus. & Prof. Code § 22952.)
- Requires all persons engaging in the retail sale of tobacco products to check the identification of tobacco purchasers, to establish the age of the purchaser, if the purchaser reasonably appears to be under 21 years of age. (Bus. & Prof. Code § 22956.)
- Authorizes an enforcing agency to assess civil penalties against any person, firm, or corporation that sells, gives, or in any way furnishes to another person who is under 21 years of age, except for military personnel 18 years of age or older, any tobacco product, instrument, or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products ranging from $400 to $6,000 for a first, second, third, fourth, or fifth violation within a five-year period. (Bus. & Prof. Code § 22958.)
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. (Health & Saf. Code § 104559.5(b)(1).)
- Provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturer’s agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the product’s labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. (Id., at (b)(2).)
- Exempts these products from the prohibition in 4): premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises; and loose leaf tobacco or premium cigars. (Id. at (d) & (e).)
- Defines “flavored tobacco product” as any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. (Id. at (a)(6).)
- Defines “characterizing flavor” to mean a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product. Includes, but are not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. Prohibits a tobacco product from being determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings or the provision of ingredient information and instead, it is the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, that constitutes a characterizing flavor. (Id. at (a)(1).)
- Requires the AG to develop and publish on its website the California Tobacco Directory, which is required to list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with the law regarding the use of stamps and meter impressions and the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) entered into by California and leading U.S. tobacco product manufacturers, as specified. (Rev. & Tax Code § 30165.1.)
- Authorizes a California Department of Tax and Fee Assessment (CDTFA) employee, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, to enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the MSA. (Rev. & Tax Code § 30435.)
- Provides that certain tobacco products, upon seizure by CDTFA, be forfeited to the state. Requires specified property forfeited to the state to be sold by CDTFA at public auction, except for cigarettes or tobacco products, which are required to be destroyed. (Rev. & Tax Code § 30436 & 30449.)
- Provides, pursuant to the California Constitution, that the people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business, and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies are required to be open to public scrutiny. (Cal. const. art. I, § 3(b)(1).)
- Requires a statute to be broadly construed if it furthers the people’s right of access, and narrowly construed if it limits the right of access. (Cal. const. art. I, § 3(b)(1).)
- Requires a statute that limits the public’s right of access to be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. (Cal. const. art. I, § 3(b)(1).)
- Governs the disclosure of information collected and maintained by public agencies pursuant to the California Public Records Act (CPRA). (Gov. Code § 7920.000 et seq.)
- States that the Legislature, mindful of the individual right to privacy, finds and declares that access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state. (§ 7921.000.)
- Defines “public records” as any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. (Gov. Code § 7920.530.)
- Provides that all public records are accessible to the public upon request, unless the record requested is exempt from public disclosure. (Gov. Code § 7922.530.)
This bill:
- Requires the AG to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL).
- Requires the AG to publish the UTL by December 31, 2025. Requires any “brand style” not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Defines “brand style” as a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a “characterizing flavor.”
- Expands the definition of “characterizing flavor” in existing law to also include, among the list of various flavors, a cooling sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
- Authorizes the AG to deem each submission to be a request to have the brand style included on the UTL. Requires any submission to be accompanied by a certification from the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category, including, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs;
- describes, for each brand style, whether a formal authorization, approval, or order from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sought and, if so, the status of the request; and
- certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon the request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor, as well as additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style.
- Requires all this information to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the CPRA.
- Requires the AG to consider, in determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor, among other factors, the information from the manufacturer or importer regarding the brand style. Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Permits this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission to provide updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports a brand style listed on the UTL, or when that brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a product to be included on the UTL to do all of the following:
- consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of the provisions in this bill and any promulgated regulations;
- appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- identify the registered agent to the AG; and
- waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce the provisions of this bill or regulations.
- Authorizes the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit a list of all brand styles that they manufacture or import into the state.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer to submit an initial application fee, and for the AG to collect an annual renewal fee, of up to $1,000 per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the AG for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. Requires the fees to be deposited into the California UTL Fund, which this bill creates, be continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the AG.
- Requires the AG to decline to include, and to remove, any brand style on the UTL that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor, or that is adulterated, misbranded, or otherwise required to obtain, but has not received, a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FDA. Makes removal of a brand style effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice. Authorizes a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials within 30 days of the notice of removal, which will also be deemed confidential.
- Permits a manufacturer or importer that certified the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or declined inclusion on the list, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law, and providing additional materials. Prohibits the filing of the petition from staying the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Prohibits a person from affixing, or causing to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
- Authorizes the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000 and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits a distributor from selling any tobacco product not on the UTL or any tobacco product flavor enhancer to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Permits the AG to assess civil penalties for each tobacco product or any tobacco product flavor enhancer sold in violation of this provision against the distributor as follows:
- no more than $2,000 for the first violation;
- no more than $3,500 for the second violation;
- no more than $5,000 for the third violation within a five-year period;
- no more than $6,500 for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and
- no more than $10,000 for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Requires the court, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce the provisions of this bill, to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action. Requires awards to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Permits the AG to adopt rules and regulations deemed necessary to implement the provisions of this bill, including any further delineating tobacco product status and characterizing flavor determinations and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Deems regulations as emergency regulations to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law as necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- Specifies that the provisions of this bill do not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Prohibits the AG from including or retaining in the California Tobacco Directory any brand style that is not listed on the UTL.
- Expands the authorization for CDTFA employees to conduct investigations, and inspections, to include any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of the prohibition to sell flavored tobacco products may be discovered.
- Adds to the list of tobacco products deemed forfeited to the state upon seizure of cigarettes or tobacco products that have affixed a California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of the requirements to be listed on the UTL. Requires any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state in violation of the UTL to be destroyed.
- Requires the person from whom property was seized to be liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this bill. Requires the proceeds of the sale of forfeited property and any money forfeited to the state to be deposited in the General Fund.
COMMENTS
- Stated need for the bill
The author writes:
Despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco, use flavored tobacco products. Market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, has no business in California and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. This bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the Attorney General to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
Attorney General Rob Bonta, the sponsor of the bill, writes:
Under current law, the flavored tobacco ban prohibits the retail sale of flavored tobacco products. Despite the ban, these products are still being sold in California and are ending up in the hands of young people. Tobacco companies make and market flavored tobacco products, which come with high nicotine content in a myriad of kid-friendly flavors. Young people are predominately the consumers of these products, and the usage among youth has increased rapidly in recent years, specifically among middle school students. A 2023 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that among middle school and high school students who currently use e-cigarettes, nearly 9 in 10 use flavored e-cigarettes.[…]
AB 3218 would provide the Attorney General’s Office, as well as other state and local enforcers, with the tools and support needed to keep flavored tobacco products out of the hands of young people; helping prevent young people from entering a lifetime of addiction and harm.
- Ban on flavored tobacco
In 2020, SB 793 (Hill, Ch. 34; Stats. 2020) was enacted into law and prohibited a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. This prohibition does not apply to the sale of Hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars. SB 793 also included the menthol flavor under its ban.
The tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the November 8, 2022 ballot seeking to have voters decide whether SB 793 should take effect. Enforcement of the ban was halted pending the election. Ultimately, voters upheld SB 793 under the referendum. The following day, R.J. Reynolds, the manufacturer of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products, filed a federal lawsuit challenging the law. Both federal district and appellate courts upheld the law, and in December of 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the tobacco industry’s appeal. Two years after the passage of SB 793, the ban finally became operative, and under current law, a tobacco retailer, or agent or employee of a tobacco retailer, in violation of the ban is guilty of an infraction and punishable by a fine of $250 for each violation.
- This bill seeks to bolster the provisions of SB 793
The AG notes that “without strict enforcement in this market, noncompliant sellers provide easy access to flavored tobacco products.” To strengthen enforcement of the existing flavored tobacco product ban, AB 3218 holds noncompliant sellers accountable and reduces the availability of flavored tobacco products by, among other things:
- establishing a publicly available list of all tobacco products that are permissibly unflavored and allowed to be sold in California;
- deeming any product not on the list a flavor tobacco product prohibited to be sold in this state;
- authorizing the AG to seek civil penalties against distributors for selling products not appearing on the UTL in order to hold the distribution chain accountable at a higher level than the retail level;
- rendering products not appearing on the UTL ineligible for tax stamps so that such products will be contraband and subject to seizure;
- requiring the AG to not include on, or remove from, the UTL any brand style that the AG determines has a characterizing flavor;
- revising the definition of “characterizing flavor” to include products that impart cooling sensations distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product;
- authorizing the AG to seek injunctive relief and civil penalties against any manufacturer that certifies a brand lacks a characterizing flavor, but the AG determines otherwise; and
- authorizing the AG to omit from the UTL any tobacco products lacking FDA authorization.
The Senate Health Committee analysis of this bill notes:
According to an October 2019 report from CDPH, “Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions,” a non-flavored list, which includes all tobacco products that may be sold in a particular jurisdiction with a flavored tobacco ban, has several substantial benefits. First, developing, maintaining, and using a non-flavored list is significantly easier than a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier; unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. CDPH further states that California’s non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level. Experts also agree that developing a non-flavored list will be easier than developing a banned products list.[1]
- Limitation on the access to public records
Under the CPRA, public records are open to inspection by the public at all times during the office hours of the agency, unless exempted from disclosure. (Gov. Cod § 7922.252.) A public record is defined as any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any public agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. (Gov. Code § 7920.530.) There are several general categories of documents or information that are permissively exempt from disclosure under the CPRA essentially due to the character of the information. The exempt information can be withheld by the public agency with custody of the information, but it also may be disclosed if it is shown that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs the public’s interest in non-disclosure of the information. (CBS, Inc. v. Block (1986) 42 Cal.3d 646, at 652.). Additionally some records are prohibited from disclosure or are specifically stated to not be public records. (see Gov. Code § 7924.110(a).)
California generally recognizes that public access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business is a fundamental and necessary right.[2] At the same time, the state recognizes that this right must be balanced against the right to privacy.[3] The general right of access to public records may, therefore, be limited when records include personal information. This bill specifies that any information a manufacturer or importer submits to the AG regarding its brand style and information regarding its characterizing flavor is confidential and proprietary and therefore not subject to disclosure under the CPRA. The bill states that this limitation on public records is necessary to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG.
- Backlog of applications for FDA approval
The bill authorizes the AG to decline or remove a product that is “adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FFDCA) or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA. Tobacco products that were commercially marketed in the U.S. after February 15, 2007 and on or before August 8, 2016, were required to apply for formal FDA approval by September 9, 2020. There is currently a backlog of about 1 million applications pending approval at the FDA from the original 27 million applications submitted.[4] Some stakeholders contend that, according to the FDA, these products with pending applications are legal to sell, even though they are technically considered adulterated under the FFDCA because they have not received approval from the FDA. The DOJ does not agree with this assertion and instead posits that the FDA, under its prosecutorial discretion, has chosen not to enforce the FFDCA to some of these products with pending applications, not that the FDA has said these products are legal to sell. As evidence for their interpretation, they point to a recent press release form the FDA that notes the FDA has authorized four menthol-flavored e-cigarette products and states that:
The agency maintains a printable one-page flyer of all authorized e-cigarette products; these are the only e-cigarette products that currently may be lawfully marketed and sold in the U.S. and those manufacturing, importing, selling, or distributing e-cigarettes without the required premarket authorization risk enforcement.[5]
Stakeholders contend that they are worried that the AG may use the discretion under the bill to remove or deny a product that has a pending application with the FDA from being on the UTL, even though the product does not meet the definition of flavored tobacco under the state statute. They note that this issue is compounded by the fact that enforcement under the bill provides for seizure and destruction of products upon removal from the directory. Stakeholders have offered amendments to address this concern but the author and sponsor have declined the amendments. The sponsor argues that it would be imprudent to enact a statutory limitation based on the FDA’s enforcement priorities, as these priorities can change, and that by specifically stating these products can be sold in this state the bill may the actually run afoul of federal preemption issues.
- Statements in support
The California Children’s Hospital Association writes in support, stating:
Tobacco companies have long pushed candy-flavored products into the youth market, quietly hooking kids into a dangerous addiction to nicotine. Smoking increases the risk for respiratory infections, weakens the immune system and is a major cause of several chronic health conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease and diabetes. In addition, there is growing evidence that vaping can also harm lung health.
In November 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a dramatic increase in youth nicotine use, leading the Surgeon General and the FDA to declare youth e-cigarette use an epidemic in the United States. The disturbing rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019, with more than 1 in 4 high school students and more than 1 in 10 middle school students using e-cigarettes. Altogether, more than 5.3 million youth were current e-cigarette users in 2019, with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors.
Eighty one percent of young people who have used tobacco started with a flavored product, and 9 in 10 middle school and high school users still report they use flavored ecigarettes. These products often mimic popular candies, drinks, or snacks in both packaging and flavor, making them particularly appealing to youth. A variety of flavored tobacco products like cotton candy, bubble gum, and mango are widely available on retail shelves. Seventy-two percent of youth tobacco users have used a flavored tobacco product in the past month and at least two-thirds of youth tobacco users report using tobacco products “because they come in flavors I like.”
By providing clarity about which tobacco products are, in fact, flavorless, and giving more tools to law enforcement, AB 3218 will further protect children and adolescents from the dangers of tobacco and nicotine addiction.
- Statements in opposition
The California Fuels and Convenience Alliance writes in opposition, stating:
While we support the concept of a Tobacco Directory and clear guidance from the Attorney General (AG) on what tobacco products are allowed to be sold by retailers, we continue to be concerned with the broad discretion given to the AG to further prohibit legal products in the state based on a subjective determination of a “characterizing flavor”. […]
By making more changes to the definition of “characterizing flavor”, AB 3218 would create further uncertainty as to which products are allowed to be sold. Specifically, the bill modifies the definition to capture products with a “cooling” or “numbing” sensation, which is legally vague, and subject to interpretation by current, and future, politically elected Attorneys General. All nicotine products contain a numbing element, and could also broadly feel like cooling, making it possible for an AG to theoretically ban every single nicotine product under the provisions of this bill. We recognize that the definition is based on an “ordinary consumer” standard and what a “typical, reasonable consumer would expect or perceive under normal conditions”. Unfortunately, we believe this is legally subjective and open to interpretation from the courts.
In order to maintain a level of legal consistency, CFCA urges that the bill be amended to remove “cooling” and “numbing” from the definition of “characterizing flavor”. When SB 793 was passed, the intent was to restrict the “growing market of flavored tobacco products…undermining progress in reducing youth tobacco use in California.” The current definition in AB 3218 would go far beyond this intent and take more legal products off the shelf, bolstering the illicit market and reducing state revenues from our highly regulated stores.
SUPPORT
Attorney General Rob Bonta (sponsor)
California Children's Hospital Association
California Dental Association
California School Nurses Organization
CleanEarth4kids.org
County Health Executives Association of California
County of Santa Clara
Mendocino County Tobacco Prevention Coalition
San Francisco Marin Medical Society
OPPOSITION
California Fuels and Convenience Alliance
RELATED LEGISLATION
Pending Legislation: SB 1230 (Rubio, 2024) increases civil penalties for violations of the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act to $6,000 and $20,000 for various violations, requires flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to be seized, and adds those products to existing law regarding forfeited products to be destroyed. SB 1230 is pending in the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee.
Prior Legislation:
AB 935 (Connolly, Ch. 351, Stats. 2023) aligned violations of the prohibition on sales of flavored tobacco and civil penalties with penalties for the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act.
AB 598 (Robert Rivas, 2021) was substantially similar to this bill. AB 598 was not heard in any Committee due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
SB 793 (Hill, Ch. 34, Stats. 2020) see Comment 2), above.
PRIOR VOTES
Senate Health Committee (Ayes 9, Noes 1)
Assembly Floor (Ayes 55, Noes 4)
Assembly Appropriations Committee (Ayes 11, Noes 1)
Assembly Judiciary Committee (Ayes 10, Noes 0)
Assembly Health Committee (Ayes 12, Noes 0)
**************
Sen. Health Comm. analysis of AB 3218 (2023-24 reg. sess.) as amended May 16, 2024 at p. 6. ↑
Cal. Const., art. I, § 3; Gov. Code, § 7921.000. ↑
Cal. Const., art. I, § 1. ↑
FDA Authorizes Marketing of Four Menthol-Flavored E-Cigarette Products After Extensive Scientific Review, FDA, (Jun. 21, 2024), available at https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-marketing-four-menthol-flavored-e-cigarette-products-after-extensive-scientific. ↑
Ibid. ↑
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Senator Richard Roth, Chair
BILL NO: AB 3218
AUTHOR: | Wood | ||
VERSION: | May 16, 2024 | ||
HEARING DATE: | June 26, 2024 | ||
CONSULTANT: | Reyes Diaz | ||
SUBJECT: Unflavored Tobacco List
SUMMARY:
Requires the California Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Permits the AG to deny inclusion of a tobacco product on the UTL.
Existing law:
- Requires the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), in order to prevent tobacco-related diseases and diminish tobacco use, to establish a program to reduce tobacco use in California by conducting health education interventions and behavior change programs at the state level, in the community, and other non-school settings. Requires CDPH to conduct statewide surveillance of tobacco-related behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes, and evaluate its local and state tobacco control programs. [HSC §104375]
- Establishes the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, which requires retailers, wholesalers, and distributors to be licensed in California to sell cigarettes or tobacco products. Authorizes any peace officer, or California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) employee granted limited peace officer status, upon presenting appropriate credentials, to enter any specified place to conduct inspections. [BPC §22970, et seq.]
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. Provides there is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturer’s agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a “characterizing flavor.” [HSC §104559.5]
- Defines “characterizing flavor” as a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product, including, but not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. Prohibits a tobacco product from being determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings, or the provision of ingredient information, but rather for the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, that constitutes a characterizing flavor. [HSC §104559.5]
- Requires the AG to develop and publish on its website the California Tobacco Directory, which is required to list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with law regarding the use of stamps and meter impressions and the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) entered into by California and leading U.S. tobacco product manufacturers, as specified. [RTC §30165.1]
- Authorizes a CDTFA employee, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, to enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the MSA. [RTC §30435]
- Provides that certain tobacco products, upon seizure by CDTFA, be forfeited to the state. Requires specified property forfeited to the state to be sold by CDTFA at public auction, except for cigarettes or tobacco products, which are required to be destroyed. [RTC §30436, 30449]
This bill:
- Requires the AG to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires the AG to publish the UTL by December 31, 2025. Requires any “brand style” not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Defines “brand style” as a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a “characterizing flavor.” Expands the definition of “characterizing flavor” in existing law to also include, among the list of various flavors, a cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
- Permits the AG to deem each submission to be a request to have the brand style included on the UTL. Requires any of these submissions to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category, including, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs;
- Describes, for each brand style, whether a formal authorization, approval, or order from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sought and, if so, the status of the request; and,
- Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon the request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor, as well as additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style. Requires all this information to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires the AG to consider, in determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor, among other factors, the information from the manufacturer or importer regarding the brand style. Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Permits this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission to submit updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports a brand style listed on the UTL, or when that brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a product to be included on the UTL to do all of the following:
- Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of the provisions in this bill and of any promulgated regulations;
- Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- Identify the registered agent to the AG; and,
- Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce the provisions of this bill or regulations.
- Permits the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit a list of all brand styles that they manufacture or import into the state.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer to submit an initial application fee, and for the AG to collect an annual renewal fee, of up $1,000 per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the AG for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. Requires the fees to be deposited into the California UTL Fund, which this bill creates, be continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the AG.
- Requires the AG to decline to include, and to remove, any brand style on the UTL that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor, or that is adulterated, misbranded, or otherwise required to obtain, but has not received, a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FDA. Makes removal of a brand style effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice. Permits a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials within 30 days of the notice of removal, which will also be deemed confidential.
- Permits a manufacturer or importer that certified the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or declined inclusion on the list, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law, and providing additional materials. Prohibits the filing of the petition from staying the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Prohibits a person from affixing, or causing to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
- Permits the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000 and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits a distributor from selling any tobacco product not on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Permits the AG to assess civil penalties for each tobacco product sold in violation against the distributor as follows:
- No more than $2,000 for the first violation;
- No more than $3,500 for the second violation;
- No more than $5,000 for the third violation within a five-year period;
- No more than $6,500 for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
- No more than $10,000 for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Requires the court, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce the provisions of this bill, to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action. Requires awards to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Permits the AG to adopt rules and regulations deemed necessary to implement the provisions of this bill, including any further delineating characterizing flavor determinations and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Deems regulations as emergency regulations to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law as necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- Specifies that the provisions of this bill do not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Prohibits the AG from including or retaining in the California Tobacco Directory any brand style that is not listed on the UTL.
- Expands the authorization for CDTFA employees to conduct investigations, and inspections, to include any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of the prohibition to sell flavored tobacco products may be discovered.
- Adds to the list of tobacco products deemed forfeited to the state upon seizure of cigarettes or tobacco products that have affixed a California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of the requirements to be listed on the UTL. Requires any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state in violation of this the UTL to be destroyed.
- Requires the person from whom property was seized to be liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this bill. Requires the proceeds of the sale of forfeited property and any money forfeited to the state to be deposited in the General Fund.
- Makes findings and declarations regarding the imposition of a limitation on the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies, including information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG, which is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
FISCAL EFFECT:
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the Department of Justice states enforcement costs of this bill would be offset by the application fee this bill requires manufactures to pay (California UTL Fund). After the UTL is established, revenues for the following funds will likely decrease by an unknown, but potentially significant, amount: Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Funds, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration estimates minor workload-related special fund costs ($10,000 to $50,000) to track, calculate, and collect costs for the destruction of tobacco products from retailers.
PRIOR VOTES:
Assembly Floor: | 55 - 4 |
Assembly Appropriations Committee: | 11 - 1 |
Assembly Judiciary Committee: | 10 - 0 |
Assembly Health Committee: | 12 - 0 |
COMMENTS:
- Author’s statement. According to the author, despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco use flavored tobacco products. Market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, has no business in California, and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. This bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the Attorney General to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
- Background. Cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the U.S., or nearly one-in-five deaths. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the following causes combined: HIV, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm-related incidents. More than ten times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the U.S. Smoking causes about 90% of all lung cancer deaths. More women die from lung cancer each year than from breast cancer. Smoking causes about 80% of all deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cigarette smoking increases the risk for death from all causes in men and women. In California, smoking-related health care costs $13.29 billion per year and smoking-related losses in productivity totals $10.35 billion per year.
- California’s flavored tobacco ban. SB 793 (Hill et al, Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020) prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. SB 793 exempts the sale of hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars from the prohibition. Fueled by kid friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, 3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018. The rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019 with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors, and there are now 5.3 million young Americans who use e-cigarettes regularly. SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban. Advocates for the inclusion of menthol cigarettes in the flavored tobacco ban regularly cited that unless action was taken an estimated 1.6 million African Americans alive today, who are now under the age of 18, would become regular smokers, and about 500,000 of those would die prematurely from a tobacco-related disease. Immediately after the passage of SB 793, the tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether or not SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. The next day, R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products filed a federal lawsuit challenging California’s ban on flavored tobacco. However, in December 2022, the Supreme Court refused to block the law, clearing the way for the ban to take effect the following week. A subsequent challenge was submitted by R.J. Reynolds, but in January 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear it.
- Non-flavored list for unflavored tobacco products. According to an October 2019 report from CDPH, “Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions,” a non-flavored list, which includes all tobacco products that may be sold in a particular jurisdiction with a flavored tobacco ban, has several substantial benefits. First, developing, maintaining, and using a non-flavored list is significantly easier than a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier; unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. CDPH further states that California’s non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level. Experts also agree that developing a non-flavored list will be easier than developing a banned products list.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on tobacco use. African-American youth and young adults have significantly lower prevalence of cigarette smoking than Hispanics and Whites, and although the prevalence of cigarette smoking among African-American and White adults is the same, African Americans smoke fewer cigarettes per day. On average, African Americans initiate smoking at a later age compared to Whites; however, they are more likely to die from smoking-related diseases than Whites. American-Indian/Alaska Native youth and adults have the highest prevalence of cigarette smoking among all racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. However, it is important to note that some American Indians use tobacco for ceremonial, religious, or medicinal purposes. Regional variations in cigarette smoking exist among American Indians/Alaska Natives, with lower prevalence in the Southwest and higher prevalence in the Northern Plains and Alaska. Hispanic/Latinx adults generally have lower prevalence of cigarette smoking and other tobacco use than other racial/ethnic groups, with the exception of Asian Americans. However, prevalence varies among sub-groups within the Hispanic population. For example, 50% of Cuban men and more than 35% of Cuban women report smoking 20 or more cigarettes per day, and Mexican men and women are less likely than other Hispanic/Latinx groups to report that they smoke 20 or more cigarettes per day. Although Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders are often combined together as one group in survey data, due to smaller numbers of the individual groups surveyed, they are actually three distinct groups. Cigarette smoking among Asian-American/Pacific Islander adults is lower than other racial ethnic groups. However, prevalence among Asian sub-groups varies and can be higher than that of the general population.
Like many other minority groups, the LGBTQ+ community has been the target of tobacco industry marketing for several decades. As a result, smoking rates are disproportionately higher among LGBTQ+ individuals than the general population. About one in four LGBTQ+ adults smoke cigarettes compared with about one in six heterosexual adults. More than twice as many LGBTQ+ students report having smoked a cigarette before the age of 13 compared to heterosexual students. In November 2023, the CDC and FDA released data from the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), which found that among U.S. high school students, current overall tobacco product use declined between 2022 and 2023 (16.5% to 12.6%). This decline was primarily driven by e-cigarettes (14.1% to 10%), which translates to 580,000 fewer high school students who currently used e-cigarettes in 2023. Among high school students, declines were also observed between 2022 and 2023 for cigars and overall combustible tobacco smoking, representing all-time lows. Although a decrease in e-cigarette use was observed among high school students, there was an increase in current overall tobacco product use among middle school students (4.5% to 6.6%) and multiple tobacco product use (1.5% to 2.5%). However, among middle school students overall, no significant change was observed between 2022 and 2023 for any individual tobacco product type, including e-cigarettes. Although there were declines, e-cigarettes are still the most favored tobacco product among youth (7.7% vs 1.6% of youth who smoke cigarettes). Additionally, 10% (1.56 million) high school students and 4.6% (550,000) middle school students reported current use of e-cigarettes.
- Double referral. This bill is double referred. Should it pass out of this Committee, it will be referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- Related legislation. SB 1230 (Rubio) increases civil penalties for violations of the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act from $400 to $6,000, in current law, to $1,000 to $20,000 for various violations. SB 1230 requires flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to be seized from retail locations, as specified, and adds those products to existing law regarding forfeited products to be destroyed. SB 1230 is set for hearing on July 2, 2024, in the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee.
- Prior legislation. SB 626 (Rubio, Chapter 182, Statutes of 2023) eliminates the exemption in existing law allowing smoking in 20% of the guestroom accommodations in a hotel, motel, or similar transient lodging establishment, thereby making all such establishments 100% smoke free.
AB 935 (Connolly, Chapter 351, Statutes of 2023) aligns violations of the prohibition on sales of flavored tobacco and civil penalties with penalties for the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act. AB 935 requires civil penalties to be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund for specified enforcement activities.
AB 598 (Robert Rivas of 2021) was similar to this bill. AB 598 was not heard in the Assembly Health Committee.
SB 793 (Hill, Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020) enacted the prohibition on flavored tobacco products to be sold in the state. SB 793 exempts from this prohibition the sale of hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars.
- Support. The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, and the American Lung Association state they were cosponsors of SB 793, which was critical to reducing youth tobacco use since eight out of 10 youth who have ever used tobacco started with a flavored product. However, like any law, it can only be effective if fully enforced, and this bill will provide necessary enhancements to the enforcement of California’s flavored tobacco restriction. Supporters argue despite losing both at the Legislature and the ballot box, the tobacco industry has shown time and again they will do whatever they can to keep kid-friendly and candy-flavored tobacco products on the shelves of California retailers to hook the next generation on their deadly products. Without further action to enhance enforcement of SB 793, the tobacco industry will continue targeting and addicting kids, Black Americans, and other groups with flavored products, even violating the law to do so. Illegal flavored e-cigarettes as well as menthol-like cigarettes designed to replicate traditional menthol cigarettes continue to proliferate at California tobacco retailers. Supporters say this bill will place the burden of proof on the tobacco industry to show a product belongs on the UTL. Supporters further argue data from the CDC Foundation show that while sales of flavored e-cigarettes have declined by 70% since implementation of SB 793, over one-third of e-cigarette sales in California are still for prohibited, flavored e-cigarettes. While the proportion of California youth and young adult tobacco users who report that it is easy to access flavored tobacco products in retail stores has declined since the ban, over 70% still believe it is easy to access these products. It is clear that more work is needed to enforce this law. Supporters state that over 90% of California high school e-cigarette users report using flavored e-cigarettes, so enforcing this rule is critical to ending this public health crisis.
- Oppose unless amended. The California Fuels and Convenience Alliance (CFCA) continues to be concerned with the broad discretion given to the AG to further prohibit legal products in the state based on a subjective determination of a “characterizing flavor.” CFCA argues as they have continued to see with the implementation of SB 793, the flavor tobacco ban has not reduced consumption of these products and has only benefited bad actors in the illicit marketplace. According to the Peace Officers’ Research Association of California, 43% of cigarettes smoked in California are smuggled in from lower-tax areas out of state. Bans have not ended the sale of flavored tobacco in California, only merely shifting the location of their sale. CFCA says where previously flavored tobacco was sold in well-regulated, licensed stores with a stake in their community, now flavored tobacco products are sold by unscrupulous actors from primarily overseas, to individuals of all ages with little regulatory enforcement. CFCA says it is essential for California to get the existing flavored tobacco ban right, rather than adding more complexity. CFCA further argues that modifying the definition to capture products with a “cooling” or “numbing” sensation creates further uncertainty as to which products are allowed to be sold and that all nicotine products contain a numbing element. CFCA requests this bill be amended to remove “cooling” and “numbing” from the definition of “characterizing flavor”.
- Letter of concern. Cigar Association of America (CAA) is strongly supportive of creating a statewide UTL as a tool to combat the widespread sale of tobacco products across California that are either flavored, illegal under federal law, or both. CAA argues that while the stated purpose of this bill is to improve enforcement against the sale of illegal flavored tobacco products in California, in reality this bill is being used as a vehicle for the AG to acquire broad and unprecedented new authority to regulate and ban legal unflavored tobacco products. CAA was encouraged when the AG sponsored this bill to create a UTL to improve statewide enforcement of the flavored tobacco ban. Once created, the UTL will greatly simplify the job of local law enforcement by providing them with a list of specific tobacco products that can legally be sold in California. CAA says under the authority given in this bill, the AG may decide to block a particular brand of cigar from being included on the UTL despite the fact that it is unflavored and legal to sell pursuant to FDA regulation. This decision could be made for any reason at all, whether motivated by a legitimate concern or a political one. CAA says then consider the local retailer who is offering this particular cigar for sale knowing that the manufacturer has stated it complies with federal law and is an unflavored tobacco product pursuant to California law. A law enforcement officer then visits this retailer to perform a routine inspection, relying on the UTL as the definitive resource for products that can legally be sold in California. The officer sees this particular cigar for sale on the store shelf and checks it against the UTL only to find that it isn’t listed. Under this bill, the officer then seizes and destroys the retailer’s inventory of that cigar and cites the retailer who must now pay a fine and is placed at risk of losing their tobacco license—for selling a legal and unflavored cigar that happened to be arbitrarily excluded from the UTL. CAA also shares the concern of the opposition regarding the expanded definition of “characterizing flavor.” CAA urges this Committee to correct these critical flaws.
- Amendments. The author requests the Committee approve amendments to this bill as follows:
- Strike the word “numbing” from the definition of “characterizing flavor”;
- Define “nicotine” as any form of the chemical nicotine, regardless of whether the chemical is naturally or synthetically derived;
- Make conforming changes regarding the definition of “tobacco products”; and,
- Correct references to “brand style” and “tobacco product flavor enhancer.”
SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
Support: American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (cosponsor)
American Heart Association (cosponsor)
American Lung Association of California (cosponsor)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (cosponsor)
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids (cosponsor)
Alameda County Board of Supervisors
California Children's Hospital Association
California Dental Association
California Medical Association
California School Nurses Organization
Cleanearth4kids.org
County Health Executives Association of California
County of Santa Clara
First 5 Mendocino
Mendocino County Tobacco Prevention Coalition
San Diego City Attorney Mara W. Elliott
San Francisco Marin Medical Society
The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition
Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee
Oppose: American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association (unless amended) California Fuels and Convenience Alliance (unless amended)
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Senator Richard Roth, Chair
BILL NO: AB 3218
AUTHOR: | Wood | ||
VERSION: | May 16, 2024 | ||
HEARING DATE: | June 19, 2024 | ||
CONSULTANT: | Reyes Diaz | ||
SUBJECT: Unflavored Tobacco List
SUMMARY:
Requires the California Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Permits the AG to deny inclusion of a tobacco product on the UTL.
Existing law:
- Requires the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), in order to prevent tobacco-related diseases and diminish tobacco use, to establish a program to reduce tobacco use in California by conducting health education interventions and behavior change programs at the state level, in the community, and other non-school settings. Requires CDPH to conduct statewide surveillance of tobacco-related behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes, and evaluate its local and state tobacco control programs. [HSC §104375]
- Establishes the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, which requires retailers, wholesalers, and distributors to be licensed in California to sell cigarettes or tobacco products. Authorizes any peace officer, or California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) employee granted limited peace officer status, upon presenting appropriate credentials, to enter any specified place to conduct inspections. [BPC §22970, et seq.]
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. Provides there is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturer’s agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a “characterizing flavor.” [HSC §104559.5]
- Defines “characterizing flavor” as a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product, including, but not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. Prohibits a tobacco product from being determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings, or the provision of ingredient information, but rather for the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, that constitutes a characterizing flavor. [HSC §104559.5]
- Requires the AG to develop and publish on its website the California Tobacco Directory, which is required to list only the tobacco product manufacturers, brand families, and brand styles of cigarettes that are compliant with law regarding the use of stamps and meter impressions and the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) entered into by California and leading U.S. tobacco product manufacturers, as specified. [RTC §30165.1]
- Authorizes a CDTFA employee, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, to enter into, and conduct an inspection of any building, facility, site, or place for which there is evidence of either the evasion of the taxes imposed, or the failure to comply with the requirements of the MSA. [RTC §30435]
- Provides that certain tobacco products, upon seizure by CDTFA, be forfeited to the state. Requires specified property forfeited to the state to be sold by CDTFA at public auction, except for cigarettes or tobacco products, which are required to be destroyed. [RTC §30436, 30449]
This bill:
- Requires the AG to establish and maintain on its website a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, known as the “Unflavored Tobacco List” (UTL). Requires the AG to publish the UTL by December 31, 2025. Requires any “brand style” not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product. Defines “brand style” as a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a “characterizing flavor.” Expands the definition of “characterizing flavor” in existing law to also include, among the list of various flavors, a cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product.
- Permits the AG to deem each submission to be a request to have the brand style included on the UTL. Requires any of these submissions to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category, including, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs;
- Describes, for each brand style, whether a formal authorization, approval, or order from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sought and, if so, the status of the request; and,
- Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon the request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor, as well as additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style. Requires all this information to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires the AG to consider, in determining whether or not a brand style has a characterizing flavor, among other factors, the information from the manufacturer or importer regarding the brand style. Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Permits this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires every manufacturer and every importer that has made a submission to submit updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports a brand style listed on the UTL, or when that brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a product to be included on the UTL to do all of the following:
- Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement of the provisions in this bill and of any promulgated regulations;
- Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- Identify the registered agent to the AG; and,
- Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce the provisions of this bill or regulations.
- Permits the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit a list of all brand styles that they manufacture or import into the state.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer to submit an initial application fee, and for the AG to collect an annual renewal fee, of up $1,000 per brand style, not to exceed the reasonable costs of processing the submissions and operating the UTL, to offset the costs incurred by the AG for processing the submissions and operating the UTL. Requires the fees to be deposited into the California UTL Fund, which this bill creates, be continuously appropriated without regard to fiscal year to the AG.
- Requires the AG to decline to include, and to remove, any brand style on the UTL that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor, or that is adulterated, misbranded, or otherwise required to obtain, but has not received, a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FDA. Makes removal of a brand style effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice. Permits a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials within 30 days of the notice of removal, which will also be deemed confidential.
- Permits a manufacturer or importer that certified the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or declined inclusion on the list, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law, and providing additional materials. Prohibits the filing of the petition from staying the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Prohibits a person from affixing, or causing to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes, or pay any tax levied on a tobacco product, unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
- Permits the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed $50,000 and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits a distributor from selling any tobacco product not on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Permits the AG to assess civil penalties for each tobacco product sold in violation against the distributor as follows:
- No more than $2,000 for the first violation;
- No more than $3,500 for the second violation;
- No more than $5,000 for the third violation within a five-year period;
- No more than $6,500 for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
- No more than $10,000 for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Requires the court, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce the provisions of this bill, to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action. Requires awards to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Permits the AG to adopt rules and regulations deemed necessary to implement the provisions of this bill, including any further delineating characterizing flavor determinations and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Deems regulations as emergency regulations to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law as necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- Specifies that the provisions of this bill do not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Prohibits the AG from including or retaining in the California Tobacco Directory any brand style that is not listed on the UTL.
- Expands the authorization for CDTFA employees to conduct investigations, and inspections, to include any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of the prohibition to sell flavored tobacco products may be discovered.
- Adds to the list of tobacco products deemed forfeited to the state upon seizure of cigarettes or tobacco products that have affixed a California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of the requirements to be listed on the UTL. Requires any cigarettes or tobacco products forfeited to the state in violation of this the UTL to be destroyed.
- Requires the person from whom property was seized to be liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this bill. Requires the proceeds of the sale of forfeited property and any money forfeited to the state to be deposited in the General Fund.
- Makes findings and declarations regarding the imposition of a limitation on the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies, including information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG, which is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
FISCAL EFFECT:
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the Department of Justice states enforcement costs of this bill would be offset by the application fee this bill requires manufactures to pay (California UTL Fund). After the UTL is established, revenues for the following funds will likely decrease by an unknown, but potentially significant, amount: Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Funds, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration estimates minor workload-related special fund costs ($10,000 to $50,000) to track, calculate, and collect costs for the destruction of tobacco products from retailers.
PRIOR VOTES:
Assembly Floor: | 55 - 4 |
Assembly Appropriations Committee: | 11 - 1 |
Assembly Judiciary Committee: | 10 - 0 |
Assembly Health Committee: | 12 - 0 |
COMMENTS:
- Author’s statement. According to the author, despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco use flavored tobacco products. Market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, has no business in California, and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. This bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the Attorney General to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
- Background. Cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the U.S., or nearly one-in-five deaths. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the following causes combined: HIV, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm-related incidents. More than ten times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the U.S. Smoking causes about 90% of all lung cancer deaths. More women die from lung cancer each year than from breast cancer. Smoking causes about 80% of all deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cigarette smoking increases the risk for death from all causes in men and women. In California, smoking-related health care costs $13.29 billion per year and smoking-related losses in productivity totals $10.35 billion per year.
- California’s flavored tobacco ban. SB 793 (Hill et al, Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020) prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. SB 793 exempts the sale of hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars from the prohibition. Fueled by kid friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, 3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018. The rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019 with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors, and there are now 5.3 million young Americans who use e-cigarettes regularly. SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban. Advocates for the inclusion of menthol cigarettes in the flavored tobacco ban regularly cited that unless action was taken an estimated 1.6 million African Americans alive today, who are now under the age of 18, would become regular smokers, and about 500,000 of those would die prematurely from a tobacco-related disease. Immediately after the passage of SB 793, the tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether or not SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. The next day, R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products filed a federal lawsuit challenging California’s ban on flavored tobacco. However, in December 2022, the Supreme Court refused to block the law, clearing the way for the ban to take effect the following week. A subsequent challenge was submitted by R.J. Reynolds, but in January 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear it.
- Non-flavored list for unflavored tobacco products. According to an October 2019 report from CDPH, “Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions,” a non-flavored list, which includes all tobacco products that may be sold in a particular jurisdiction with a flavored tobacco ban, has several substantial benefits. First, developing, maintaining, and using a non-flavored list is significantly easier than a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier; unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. CDPH further states that California’s non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level. Experts also agree that developing a non-flavored list will be easier than developing a banned products list.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on tobacco use. African-American youth and young adults have significantly lower prevalence of cigarette smoking than Hispanics and Whites, and although the prevalence of cigarette smoking among African-American and White adults is the same, African Americans smoke fewer cigarettes per day. On average, African Americans initiate smoking at a later age compared to Whites; however, they are more likely to die from smoking-related diseases than Whites. American-Indian/Alaska Native youth and adults have the highest prevalence of cigarette smoking among all racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. However, it is important to note that some American Indians use tobacco for ceremonial, religious, or medicinal purposes. Regional variations in cigarette smoking exist among American Indians/Alaska Natives, with lower prevalence in the Southwest and higher prevalence in the Northern Plains and Alaska. Hispanic/Latinx adults generally have lower prevalence of cigarette smoking and other tobacco use than other racial/ethnic groups, with the exception of Asian Americans. However, prevalence varies among sub-groups within the Hispanic population. For example, 50% of Cuban men and more than 35% of Cuban women report smoking 20 or more cigarettes per day, and Mexican men and women are less likely than other Hispanic/Latinx groups to report that they smoke 20 or more cigarettes per day. Although Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders are often combined together as one group in survey data, due to smaller numbers of the individual groups surveyed, they are actually three distinct groups. Cigarette smoking among Asian-American/Pacific Islander adults is lower than other racial ethnic groups. However, prevalence among Asian sub-groups varies and can be higher than that of the general population.
Like many other minority groups, the LGBTQ+ community has been the target of tobacco industry marketing for several decades. As a result, smoking rates are disproportionately higher among LGBTQ+ individuals than the general population. About one in four LGBTQ+ adults smoke cigarettes compared with about one in six heterosexual adults. More than twice as many LGBTQ+ students report having smoked a cigarette before the age of 13 compared to heterosexual students. In November 2023, the CDC and FDA released data from the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), which found that among U.S. high school students, current overall tobacco product use declined between 2022 and 2023 (16.5% to 12.6%). This decline was primarily driven by e-cigarettes (14.1% to 10%), which translates to 580,000 fewer high school students who currently used e-cigarettes in 2023. Among high school students, declines were also observed between 2022 and 2023 for cigars and overall combustible tobacco smoking, representing all-time lows. Although a decrease in e-cigarette use was observed among high school students, there was an increase in current overall tobacco product use among middle school students (4.5% to 6.6%) and multiple tobacco product use (1.5% to 2.5%). However, among middle school students overall, no significant change was observed between 2022 and 2023 for any individual tobacco product type, including e-cigarettes. Although there were declines, e-cigarettes are still the most favored tobacco product among youth (7.7% vs 1.6% of youth who smoke cigarettes). Additionally, 10% (1.56 million) high school students and 4.6% (550,000) middle school students reported current use of e-cigarettes.
- Double referral. This bill is double referred. Should it pass out of this Committee, it will be referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- Related legislation. SB 1230 (Rubio) increases civil penalties for violations of the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act from $400 to $6,000, in current law, to $1,000 to $20,000 for various violations. SB 1230 requires flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers to be seized from retail locations, as specified, and adds those products to existing law regarding forfeited products to be destroyed. SB 1230 is pending in the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee.
- Prior legislation. SB 626 (Rubio, Chapter 182, Statutes of 2023) eliminates the exemption in existing law allowing smoking in 20% of the guestroom accommodations in a hotel, motel, or similar transient lodging establishment, thereby making all such establishments 100% smoke free.
AB 935 (Connolly, Chapter 351, Statutes of 2023) aligns violations of the prohibition on sales of flavored tobacco and civil penalties with penalties for the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act. AB 935 requires civil penalties to be deposited in the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Compliance Fund for specified enforcement activities.
AB 598 (Robert Rivas of 2021) was similar to this bill. AB 598 was not heard in the Assembly Health Committee.
SB 793 (Hill, Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020) enacted the prohibition on flavored tobacco products to be sold in the state. SB 793 exempts from this prohibition the sale of hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars.
- Support. The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, and the American Lung Association state they were cosponsors of SB 793, which was critical to reducing youth tobacco use since eight out of 10 youth who have ever used tobacco started with a flavored product. However, like any law, it can only be effective if fully enforced, and this bill will provide necessary enhancements to the enforcement of California’s flavored tobacco restriction. Supporters argue despite losing both at the Legislature and the ballot box, the tobacco industry has shown time and again they will do whatever they can to keep kid-friendly and candy-flavored tobacco products on the shelves of California retailers to hook the next generation on their deadly products. Without further action to enhance enforcement of SB 793, the tobacco industry will continue targeting and addicting kids, Black Americans, and other groups with flavored products, even violating the law to do so. Illegal flavored e-cigarettes as well as menthol-like cigarettes designed to replicate traditional menthol cigarettes continue to proliferate at California tobacco retailers. Supporters say this bill will place the burden of proof on the tobacco industry to show a product belongs on the UTL. Supporters further argue data from the CDC Foundation show that while sales of flavored e-cigarettes have declined by 70% since implementation of SB 793, over one-third of e-cigarette sales in California are still for prohibited, flavored e-cigarettes. While the proportion of California youth and young adult tobacco users who report that it is easy to access flavored tobacco products in retail stores has declined since the ban, over 70% still believe it is easy to access these products. It is clear that more work is needed to enforce this law. Supporters state that over 90% of California high school e-cigarette users report using flavored e-cigarettes, so enforcing this rule is critical to ending this public health crisis.
- Oppose unless amended. The California Fuels and Convenience Alliance (CFCA) continues to be concerned with the broad discretion given to the AG to further prohibit legal products in the state based on a subjective determination of a “characterizing flavor.” CFCA argues as they have continued to see with the implementation of SB 793, the flavor tobacco ban has not reduced consumption of these products and has only benefited bad actors in the illicit marketplace. According to the Peace Officers’ Research Association of California, 43% of cigarettes smoked in California are smuggled in from lower-tax areas out of state. Bans have not ended the sale of flavored tobacco in California, only merely shifting the location of their sale. CFCA says where previously flavored tobacco was sold in well-regulated, licensed stores with a stake in their community, now flavored tobacco products are sold by unscrupulous actors from primarily overseas, to individuals of all ages with little regulatory enforcement. CFCA says it is essential for California to get the existing flavored tobacco ban right, rather than adding more complexity. CFCA further argues that modifying the definition to capture products with a “cooling” or “numbing” sensation creates further uncertainty as to which products are allowed to be sold and that all nicotine products contain a numbing element. CFCA requests this bill be amended to remove “cooling” and “numbing” from the definition of “characterizing flavor”.
- Letter of concern. Cigar Association of America (CAA) is strongly supportive of creating a statewide UTL as a tool to combat the widespread sale of tobacco products across California that are either flavored, illegal under federal law, or both. CAA argues that while the stated purpose of this bill is to improve enforcement against the sale of illegal flavored tobacco products in California, in reality this bill is being used as a vehicle for the AG to acquire broad and unprecedented new authority to regulate and ban legal unflavored tobacco products. CAA was encouraged when the AG sponsored this bill to create a UTL to improve statewide enforcement of the flavored tobacco ban. Once created, the UTL will greatly simplify the job of local law enforcement by providing them with a list of specific tobacco products that can legally be sold in California. CAA says under the authority given in this bill, the AG may decide to block a particular brand of cigar from being included on the UTL despite the fact that it is unflavored and legal to sell pursuant to FDA regulation. This decision could be made for any reason at all, whether motivated by a legitimate concern or a political one. CAA says then consider the local retailer who is offering this particular cigar for sale knowing that the manufacturer has stated it complies with federal law and is an unflavored tobacco product pursuant to California law. A law enforcement officer then visits this retailer to perform a routine inspection, relying on the UTL as the definitive resource for products that can legally be sold in California. The officer sees this particular cigar for sale on the store shelf and checks it against the UTL only to find that it isn’t listed. Under this bill, the officer then seizes and destroys the retailer’s inventory of that cigar and cites the retailer who must now pay a fine and is placed at risk of losing their tobacco license—for selling a legal and unflavored cigar that happened to be arbitrarily excluded from the UTL. CAA also shares the concern of the opposition regarding the expanded definition of “characterizing flavor.” CAA urges this Committee to correct these critical flaws.
SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
Support: American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (cosponsor)
American Heart Association (cosponsor)
American Lung Association of California (cosponsor)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (cosponsor)
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids (cosponsor)
Alameda County Board of Supervisors
California Children's Hospital Association
California Dental Association
California Medical Association
California School Nurses Organization
Cleanearth4kids.org
County Health Executives Association of California
County of Santa Clara
First 5 Mendocino
Mendocino County Tobacco Prevention Coalition
San Diego City Attorney Mara W. Elliott
San Francisco Marin Medical Society
The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition
Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee
Oppose: American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association (unless amended) California Fuels and Convenience Alliance (unless amended)
-- END --
Date of Hearing: April 9, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Mia Bonta, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 3218
Author:((Wood) – As Amended Ver:April 1, 2024
SUBJECT: Unflavored Tobacco List.
SUMMARY: Requires the Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain on the AG’s website, a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL). Specifically, this bill:
- Requires every manufacturer and importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Requires any submission to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Requires categories to include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs;
- Certifies that each brand style is not adulterated as defined, or misbranded as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 United States Code, Sec. 301 et seq.); and,
- Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor.
- Requires information submitted to the AG by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this bill to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires, upon the request of the AG, a manufacturer or importer to provide additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style.
- Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Allows this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined or misbranded as defined in the FFDCA, or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FFDCA.
- Requires the AG to remove from the UTL any brand style that the AG determines has a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to remove from the UTL any brand style that is adulterated or misbranded as defined in the FFDCA, or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FFDCA. Requires the AG to promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the AG removes it from the UTL. Requires this notice to include the basis for the AG’s determination.
- Makes the removal of a brand style from the UTL effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to 7) above.
- Authorizes a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in 7) above within 30 days of the notice.
- Requires information submitted to the AG by a manufacturer or importer pursuant 9) above to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product, as defined.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer that has made a submission under the provisions of this bill to submit updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to this bill to also do all of the following:
- Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement, and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this bill;
- Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- Identify the registered agent to the AG; and,
- Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this bill or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this bill.
- Authorizes the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state.
- Allows, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the AG declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the AG that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. Prohibits the filing of the petition from operating to stay the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Authorizes a manufacturer or importer to challenge a decision by the AG pursuant to 15) above, in addition to providing additional materials to the AG pursuant to 9) above.
- Requires the AG to publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
- Prohibits any person from affixing, or causing to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes, or paying any tax levied on a tobacco product unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
- Authorizes the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the AG that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits any distributor from selling any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Authorizes the AG, for each tobacco product sold in violation of this bill, to assess civil penalties against the distributor according to the following schedule:
- A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation;
- A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation;
- A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period;
- A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
- A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Requires, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorney’s fees, and costs. Requires rewards under this bill to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Authorizes the AG to adopt those rules and regulations the AG deems necessary to implement the purposes of this bill, including regulations further delineating characterizing flavor determinations, requiring a fee for manufacturer and importer certifications, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Makes the regulations adopted to implement this bill emergency regulations, and required to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- States that this bill does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this bill, references or incorporates the UTL, or imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Defines the following, for the purposes of this bill:
- “Brand style” to mean a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification;
- “Characterizing flavor” to mean a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product;
- “Tobacco product” to mean a tobacco product as defined in existing law, but excluding looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined; and,
- “Flavored tobacco product” to means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. “Flavored tobacco product” includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the UTL established and maintained by the AG.
- Requires cigarettes or tobacco products seized by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of this bill to be forfeited to the state.
- Authorizes an employee of CDTFA, upon presentation of appropriate identification, to enter any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of the ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products has been discovered.
- Makes the provisions of this bill severable. Provides that if any provision of this bill or its application is held invalid, that invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Finds and declares that in order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to protect the public's health and help shape positive health outcomes for individuals, families and communities. Establishes the California Tobacco Control Branch within DPH, which leads statewide and local health programs, services and activities that promote a tobacco free environment. [Health and Safety Code (HSC) §131056]
- Requires CDTFA, under the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act, to administer a statewide program to license cigarette and tobacco products manufacturers, importers, distributors, wholesalers, and retailers. Prohibits selling tobacco products without a valid license, and makes violations punishable as a misdemeanor. Retailers are required to obtain a separate license for each retail location that sells cigarettes and tobacco products and pay to an annual license fee. [Business and Professions Code (BCP) §22970 et seq.]
- Requires DPH to establish and develop a program to reduce the availability of “tobacco products,” as defined, to persons under 21 years of age through authorized enforcement activities, as specified, pursuant to the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act (STAKE Act). [BCP §22952]
- Requires all persons engaging in the retail sale of tobacco products to check the identification of tobacco purchasers, to establish the age of the purchaser, if the purchaser reasonably appears to be under 21. [BPC §22956]
- Permits an enforcing agency, as specified, to assess civil penalties against any person, firm, or corporation that sells, gives, or in any way furnishes to another person who is under 21 any tobacco product, instrument, or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products, as specified, ranging from $400 to $6,000 for a first, second, third, fourth, or fifth violation within a five-year period. [BPC §22958]
- Permits an enforcing agency to assess civil penalties against any person, firm, or corporation that sells, gives, or in any way furnishes to another person who is under 21, except for military personnel 18 years of age or older, any tobacco product, instrument, or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products ranging from $400 to $6,000 for a first, second, third, fourth, or fifth violation within a five-year period. [BPC §22958]
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a “flavored tobacco product,” as defined, or a “tobacco product flavor enhancer,” and authorizes an enforcing agency (DPH, the AG, or a local law enforcement agency) to assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates this provision. [HSC §104559.5]
- Requires DPH, in addition to the civil penalties in 6) above, upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, to notify CDTFA of the violation. Requires CDTFA to assess a civil penalty of $250 and suspend or revoke a retailer’s license. [Ibid.]
- Defines “flavored tobacco product” as any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Defines “tobacco product flavor enhancer” as a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product. [Ibid.]
- Defines “characterizing flavor” to mean a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product. Includes, but are not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. Prohibits a tobacco product from being determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings or the provision of ingredient information and instead, it is the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, that constitutes a characterizing flavor.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee.
COMMENTS:
- PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco, use flavored tobacco products. The author notes that market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, have no business in California and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. The author concludes that this bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the AG to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
- BACKGROUND. Cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the United States (U.S.), or nearly one in five deaths. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the following causes combined: Human immunodeficiency virus, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm-related incidents. More than 10 times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the U.S. Smoking causes about 90% (or nine out of 10) of all lung cancer deaths. More women die from lung cancer each year than from breast cancer. Smoking causes about 80% (or eight out of 10) of all deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cigarette smoking increases the risk for death from all causes in men and women. In California, smoking-related health care costs $13.29 billion per year and smoking-related losses in productivity totals $10.35 billion per year.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on tobacco use. African American youth and young adults have significantly lower prevalence of cigarette smoking than Hispanics and whites, and although the prevalence of cigarette smoking among African American and white adults is the same, African Americans smoke fewer cigarettes per day. On average, African Americans initiate smoking at a later age compared to whites; however, they are more likely to die from smoking-related diseases than whites.
American Indian/Alaska Native youth and adults have the highest prevalence of cigarette smoking among all racial/ethnic groups in the U.S, however, it is important to note that some American Indians use tobacco for ceremonial, religious, or medicinal purposes. Regional variations in cigarette smoking exist among American Indians/Alaska Natives, with lower prevalence in the Southwest and higher prevalence in the Northern Plains and Alaska.
Hispanic/Latin adults generally have lower prevalence of cigarette smoking and other tobacco use than other racial/ethnic groups, with the exception of Asian Americans. However, prevalence varies among sub-groups within the Hispanic population, for example, 50% of Cuban men and more than 35% of Cuban women report smoking 20 or more cigarettes per day, and Mexican men and women are less likely than other Hispanic/Latinx groups to report that they smoke 20 or more cigarettes per day.
Although Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders are often combined together as one group in survey data due to smaller numbers of the individual groups surveyed, they are actually three distinct groups. Cigarette smoking among Asian American/Pacific Islander adults is lower than other racial ethnic groups, however, prevalence among Asian sub-groups varies and can be higher than that of the general population. Like many other minority groups, the LGBTQ+ community has been the target of tobacco industry marketing for several decades. As a result, smoking rates are disproportionately higher among LGBTQ+ individuals than the general population. About one in four LGBTQ+ adults smoke cigarettes compared with about one in six heterosexual/straight adults. More than twice as many LGBTQ+ students report having smoked a cigarette before the age of 13 compared to heterosexual students. - California’s flavored tobacco ban. In 2020 the Legislature passed, and Governor Newsom signed, SB 793 (Hill), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020. The law prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. It exempts the sale of Hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars from the prohibition. Fueled by kid friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, 3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018. The disturbing rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019 with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors and there are now 5.3 million young Americans who use e-cigarettes regularly. SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban, because, as the author of SB 793 noted during his bill presentation, unless action is taken, an estimated 1.6 million African Americans alive today, who are now under the age of 18, will become regular smokers; and about 500,000 of those will die prematurely from a tobacco-related disease.
Immediately after the passage of SB 793, the tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether or not SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. The next day, R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products filed a federal lawsuit challenging California’s ban on flavored tobacco. However, in December of 2022 the Supreme Court refused to block the law, clearing the way for the ban to take effect the next week. The law states that a tobacco retailer, or agent or employee of a tobacco retailer, in violation of this section is guilty of an infraction and will be punished by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each violation. This law does not specify where the enforcement authority of this statute resides, which implies local jurisdictions have authority to enforce this law. - Misbranded or adulterated tobacco products pursuant to the FFDCA. Under federal law, a tobacco product is deemed to be misbranded if: i) its labeling is false or misleading in any particular; ii) if in package form unless it bears a label containing the name and place of business of the tobacco product manufacturer, packer, or distributor, an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count; and, an accurate statement of the percentage of the tobacco used in the product that is domestically grown tobacco and the percentage that is foreign grown tobacco. A tobacco product shall be deemed to be adulterated if it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance, or is otherwise contaminated by any added poisonous or added deleterious substance that may render the product injurious to health.
- Grandfathered tobacco products. Generally, to be legally marketed in the U.S., the FFDCA requires “new tobacco products” to have a premarket authorization order in effect. A “new tobacco product” is any tobacco product that was not commercially marketed in the U.S. as of February 15, 2007, or any modified tobacco product that was commercially marketed after February 15, 2007. A marketing authorization is required for a new tobacco product unless: i) the manufacturer of the product submitted a report under the FFDCA Act and FDA issues an order finding the product substantially equivalent to a predicate tobacco product; or, ii) the manufacturer submitted a report and all modifications are covered by exemptions from the requirements of substantial equivalence granted by FDA. The FDA deems new tobacco products without required marketing authorization as adulterated and misbranded.
This bill would allow the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under the FFDCA. Although the FDA has only authorized 23 tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes to date, there are thousands of flavored and arguably flavored tobacco products that remain available for retail sale in California despite lacking FDA authorization. Many of the unauthorized products are labeled “clear” or ambiguously branded with flavor concepts (i.e. “Blue” instead of “Blueberry”) in order to avoid flavor bans.
This bill requires a manufacturer or reporter to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution (to be included on the UTL), that lack a characterizing flavor. This bill also requires the manufacturer to certify under penalty of perjury that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on tobacco use. African American youth and young adults have significantly lower prevalence of cigarette smoking than Hispanics and whites, and although the prevalence of cigarette smoking among African American and white adults is the same, African Americans smoke fewer cigarettes per day. On average, African Americans initiate smoking at a later age compared to whites; however, they are more likely to die from smoking-related diseases than whites.
d) Benefits of an UTL. According to an October 2019 DPH whitepaper, “Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions,” a non-flavored list, which includes all tobacco products that may be sold in a particular jurisdiction, has several substantial benefits. First, developing, maintaining and using a non-flavored list is significantly easier than a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier; unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. Further, California’s non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level.
- SUPPORT. AG Rob Bonta is the sponsor of this bill and states that under current law, the flavored tobacco ban prohibits the retail sale of flavored tobacco products. Despite the ban, these products are still being sold in California and are ending up in the hands of young people. Tobacco companies make and market flavored tobacco products, which come with high nicotine content in a myriad of kid-friendly flavors. Young people are predominately the consumers of these products, and the usage among youth has increased rapidly in recent years, specifically among middle school students. A 2023 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that among middle school and high school students who currently use e-cigarettes, nearly nine in 10 use flavored e-cigarettes. The AG notes that without strict enforcement in this market, noncompliant sellers provide easy access to flavored tobacco products, and this bill would hold noncompliant sellers accountable and reduce the availability of flavored tobacco products in the following ways: i) establish a publicly available list of all tobacco products that are permissibly unflavored and allowed to be sold in California (UTL) so that industry participants and law enforcement entities can easily ascertain which products can and cannot be sold; ii) authorize the AG to seek civil penalties against distributors for selling products not appearing on the UTL to hold the distribution chain accountable at a higher level than the retail level; iii) render products not appearing on the UTL ineligible for tax stamps so that such products will be contraband and subject to seizure; iv) revise the definition of “characterizing flavor,” which delineates which tobacco products are prohibited from being sold to specifically include products that impart menthol-like cooling sensations, as well as other flavors that are “distinguishable by an ordinary consumer” so that the ban will encompass “edge” products that have been subject to debate and litigation; and, v) authorize the AG to omit from the UTL any tobacco products lacking FDA authorization. The AG concludes this bill would provide the AG’s Office, as well as other state and local enforcers, with the tools and support needed to keep flavored tobacco products out of the hands of young people; helping prevent young people from entering a lifetime of addiction and harm.
- PREVIOUS LEGISLATION.
- AB 935 (Connolly), Chapter 351, Statutes of 2023, makes provisions of current law prohibiting a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer's agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, punishable by civil penalties in the same manner as the STAKE Act.
- SB 793 (Hill) prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified.
- AB 598 (Rivas) of 2021, would have required the AG to establish and maintain a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. AB 598 was not heard in the Assembly Health Committee.
- DOUBLE REFERRAL. This bill has been double-referred; upon passage of this Committee, it will be referred to the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Attorney General Rob Bonta (sponsor)
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network INC.
American Heart Association
American Lung Association of California
California Children's Hospital Association
California Dental Association
California Medical Association
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids
County Health Executives Association of California (CHEAC)
County of Santa Clara
San Diego City Attorney's Office
The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
ATR Bill Id:AB 3218
Author:(Wood)
As Amended Ver:May 16, 2024
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Requires the Attorney General (AG), no later than December 31, 2025, to establish and maintain on the AG's website, a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL). Requires each manufacturer or importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles, as defined, of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California. Requires a manufacturer or importer that submits a product to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, and describe, for each brand style, if a formal authorization, approval, or order from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sought and its status, and certify that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to charge a fee for each submission and renewal of a brand style.
Major Provisions
COMMENTS
Cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the United States (U.S.), or nearly one in five deaths. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the following causes combined: Human immunodeficiency virus, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm-related incidents. More than 10 times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the U.S. Smoking causes about 90% (or nine out of 10) of all lung cancer deaths. More women die from lung cancer each year than from breast cancer. Smoking causes about 80% (or eight out of 10) of all deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cigarette smoking increases the risk for death from all causes in men and women. In California, smoking-related health care costs $13.29 billion per year and smoking-related losses in productivity totals $10.35 billion per year.
California's flavored tobacco ban. In 2020 the Legislature passed, and Governor Newsom signed, SB 793 (Hill), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020. The law prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. It exempts the sale of Hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars from the prohibition. Fueled by kid friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, 3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018. The disturbing rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019 with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors and there are now 5.3 million young Americans who use e-cigarettes regularly. SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original FDA ban, because, as the author of SB 793 noted during his bill presentation, unless action is taken, an estimated 1.6 million African Americans alive today, who are now under the age of 18, will become regular smokers; and about 500,000 of those will die prematurely from a tobacco-related disease.
Immediately after the passage of SB 793, the tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether or not SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. The next day, R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products filed a federal lawsuit challenging California's ban on flavored tobacco. However, in December of 2022 the Supreme Court refused to block the law, clearing the way for the ban to take effect the next week. The law states that a tobacco retailer, or agent or employee of a tobacco retailer, in violation of this section is guilty of an infraction and will be punished by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each violation. This law does not specify where the enforcement authority of this statute resides, which implies local jurisdictions have authority to enforce this law.
Grandfathered tobacco products. Generally, to be legally marketed in the U.S., federal law requires "new tobacco products" to have a premarket authorization order in effect. A "new tobacco product" is any tobacco product that was not commercially marketed in the U.S. as of February 15, 2007, or any modified tobacco product that was commercially marketed after February 15, 2007. A marketing authorization is required for a new tobacco product unless: 1) the manufacturer of the product submitted a report and FDA issues an order finding the product substantially equivalent to a predicate tobacco product; or, 2) the manufacturer submitted a report and all modifications are covered by exemptions from the requirements of substantial equivalence granted by FDA. The FDA deems new tobacco products without required marketing authorization as adulterated and misbranded.
This bill would allow the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order. Although the FDA has only authorized 23 tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes to date, there are thousands of flavored and arguably flavored tobacco products that remain available for retail sale in California despite lacking FDA authorization. Many of the unauthorized products are labeled "clear" or ambiguously branded with flavor concepts (i.e. "Blue" instead of "Blueberry") in order to avoid flavor bans.
Benefits of an UTL. According to an October 2019 DPH whitepaper, "Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions," a non-flavored list, which includes all tobacco products that may be sold in a particular jurisdiction, has several substantial benefits. First, developing, maintaining and using a non-flavored list is significantly easier than a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier; unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. Further, California's non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level.
According to the Author
Children who use tobacco, use flavored tobacco products. The author notes that market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, have no business in California and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. The author concludes that this bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the AG to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
Arguments in Support
AG Rob Bonta is the sponsor of this bill and states that under current law, the flavored tobacco ban prohibits the retail sale of flavored tobacco products. Despite the ban, these products are still being sold in California and are ending up in the hands of young people. Tobacco companies make and market flavored tobacco products, which come with high nicotine content in a myriad of kid-friendly flavors. Young people are predominately the consumers of these products, and the usage among youth has increased rapidly in recent years, specifically among middle school students. A 2023 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that among middle school and high school students who currently use e-cigarettes, nearly nine in 10 use flavored e-cigarettes. The AG notes that without strict enforcement in this market, noncompliant sellers provide easy access to flavored tobacco products, and this bill would hold noncompliant sellers accountable and reduce the availability of flavored tobacco products.
Arguments in Opposition
The American Petroleum & Convenience Store Association (APCSA) is opposed to this bill unless it is amended and states that California does not need another tobacco related proposal after voters upheld the statewide flavor ban in November of 2022, which has been in effect since December of 2022. Additionally, in 2023, California passed and enacted AB 935, which is an enforcement bill specifically designed to enforce the flavor ban. APCSA contends that what the state needs to do is simply enforce their existing laws instead of adding new regulations.
APCSA concludes that because of already minimal enforcement to date on illicit products, this bill may only serve to exacerbate the illicit market on all tobacco products.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the Department of Justice states enforcement costs of this bill would be offset by the application fee manufacturers this bill requires them to pay (California Unflavored Tobacco List Fund). After the UTL is established, revenues for the following funds will likely decrease by an unknown, but potentially significant, amount: Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Funds, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration estimates minor workload-related special fund costs ($10,000 to $50,000) to track, calculate, and collect costs for the destruction of tobacco products from retailers.
VOTES
ASM HEALTH: 12-0-4
YES: Bonta, Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Wendy Carrillo, Haney, Jones-Sawyer, Maienschein, McCarty, Rodriguez, Santiago, Schiavo, Weber
ABS, ABST OR NV: Waldron, Flora, Joe Patterson, Sanchez
ASM JUDICIARY: 10-0-2
YES: Kalra, Dixon, Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Haney, Maienschein, McKinnor, Pacheco, Reyes
ABS, ABST OR NV: Sanchez, Waldron
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-1-3
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Mike Fong, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Pellerin, Villapudua
NO: Dixon
ABS, ABST OR NV: Sanchez, Jim Patterson, Ta
UPDATED
VERSION: May 16, 2024
CONSULTANT: Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0003358
Date of Hearing: May 15, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 3218
Author:(Wood) – As Amended Ver:April 1, 2024
Policy Committee: | Health | Vote: | 12 - 0 |
Judiciary | 10 - 0 | ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill requires the Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL), a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. The bill requires all manufacturers and distributors of tobacco products for sale or distribution in or into California to submit information about their products to the AG for inclusion on the UTL.
Specifically, this bill includes the following provisions, among others:
- Requires every manufacturer and importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products it manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into California and that lack a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Requires any submission to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category, and requires categories to include cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
- Certifies each brand style is not adulterated as defined, or misbranded as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
- Certifies each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category, and requires categories to include cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
- Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, as specified. Allows this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined or misbranded as defined in the FFDCA, or is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FFDCA.
- Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product, as defined.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer that has made a submission under the provisions of this bill to submit updated information to the AG when it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to these provisions to, under penalty of perjury, describe each brand style, brand, and product category, as specified, certify each brand style is not adulterated or misbranded, as defined, and certify each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Allows a manufacturer or importer to challenge as erroneous the AG’s determination that a product is not to be included on the UTL, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. Prohibits the filing of the petition from operating to stay the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Establishes a schedule of civil penalties the AG may assess against a distributor for selling products in violation of this bill.
- Requires the court, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorney’s fees, and costs. Requires rewards under this bill to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Authorizes the AG to adopt those rules and regulations the AG deems necessary to implement the purposes of this bill, including regulations further delineating characterizing flavor determinations, requiring a fee for manufacturer and importer certifications, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Makes the regulations adopted to implement this bill emergency regulations, and required to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
FISCAL EFFECT:
The Department of Justice (DOJ) estimates General Fund costs of $189,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2024-25, and $547,000 per year in FY 2025-26 and ongoing for three staff positions to prepare emergency regulations and forms; make determinations of eligibility for the UTL; coordinate with industry stakeholders on compliance and determinations; coordinate with other state agencies regarding the Unflavored Tobacco List; receive and process applications for listing on the Unflavored Tobacco List; and track administrative fees and costs.
DOJ and CDTFA note that after the UTL is established, revenues for the following funds will likely decrease by an unknown amount: Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Funds, California Electronic Cigarette Excise Tax Fund, and General Fund.
CDTFA estimates minor workload-related special fund costs ($10,000 to $50,000) to track, calculate, and collect costs for the destruction of tobacco products from retailers.
According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the General Fund faces a structural deficit in the tens of billions of dollars over the next several fiscal years.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. AG Rob Bonta is the sponsor of this bill. According to the author:
Despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, they remain readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco, use flavored tobacco products. Market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, have no business in California and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. This bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the Attorney General to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
- Background.
California’s Ban on Flavored Tobacco. Fueled by kid-friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, 3.6 million middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018. The rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019 with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors.
In 2020, California enacted SB 793 (Hill), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020, prohibiting a tobacco retailer from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. Hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars are exempt from the prohibition. SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban, because, the author of SB 793 argued, “unless action is taken, an estimated 1.6 million African Americans alive today, who are under the age of 18, will become regular smokers; and about 500,000 of them will die prematurely from a tobacco-related disease.”
Immediately after the passage of SB 793, the tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products, filed a federal lawsuit challenging California’s ban on flavored tobacco. In December 2022, the Supreme Court refused to block the law, clearing the way for the ban to take effect the following week.
AG Rob Bonta, the sponsor of this bill, states despite the ban on flavored tobacco, these products are still being sold in California and are ending up in the hands of young people. The AG cites a 2023 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that reported nearly nine in 10 middle school and high school students who use e-cigarettes use flavored e-cigarettes. The AG argues this bill would hold noncompliant sellers accountable and reduce the availability of flavored tobacco products.
Benefits of the UTL. According to an October 2019 California Department of Public Health white paper, “Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions,” a UTL has several substantial benefits. First, a non-flavored list is significantly easier to develop and maintain than is a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier because unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. Further, California’s non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states, reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level.
Analysis Prepared by: Allegra Kim / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: April 16, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Ash Kalra, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 3218
Author:(Wood) – As Amended Ver:April 1, 2024
SUBJECT: Unflavored Tobacco List
KEY ISSUE: In order to enforce the state’s existing BAN ON THE SALE OF flavored tobacco, should THE Attorney General (AG) establish and maintain a list of tobacco productS that lack a characterizing flavor, and SHOULD all manufacturers and distributors BE REQUIRED to submit information about their products to the AG IN ORDER TO BE SOLD IN CALIFORNIA?
SYNOPSIS
Confronted with disturbing trends of increased use of tobacco products among American teens (3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes) the Legislature passed, and Governor Newsom signed, SB 793 (Hill), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020. The law prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. However, without a definitive list of which tobacco products are flavored (or conversely a list of products that are not flavored), there is no way to know if a specific product is lawful in the state, making it difficult to comply with and enforce the law. This bill requires all manufacturers and distributors of tobacco products to submit information about their products to the AG for the inclusion of their products on the UTL. The bill also provides penalties and specific enforcement authority to the AG.
This bill, co-sponsored by Attorney General Rob Bonta; Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids; American Lung Association in California; American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network; and the American Heart Association, requires the Attorney General (AG), in order to enforce the state’s existing laws that prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco in the state, to establish and maintain on the AG’s website, a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL). There are three main aspects of the bill that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee: (1) the limitations on the release of records in the possession of the AG which otherwise are open to public inspection and disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (CPRA); (2) due process for applicants to the UTL whose products are not listed on the UTL; and (3) the enforcement authority of the AG as well as civil penalties that the AG is authorized to recover and are therefore the focus of this analysis.
The bill is supported by numerous public health and youth advocacy organizations, and public officials and agencies. It is opposed (unless amended) by the American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association and California Fuels and Convenience Alliance. The bill previously was approved by the Assembly Committee on Health by a vote of 12-0.
SUMMARY: In order to enforce the state’s existing laws banning the sale of flavored tobacco, requires the Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL) and requires all manufacturers and distributors of tobacco products to submit information about their products to the AG for inclusion on the UTL. Specifically, this bill:
- Requires every manufacturer and importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Requires any submission to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Requires categories to include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
- Certifies that each brand style is not adulterated as defined, or misbranded as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 United States Code, Sec. 301 et seq.).
- Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor.
- Provides that information submitted by a manufacturer or importer in response to a request from the AG for proprietary information about flavoring and marketing shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. This information shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires, upon the request of the AG, a manufacturer or importer to provide additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style.
- Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Allows this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined or misbranded as defined in the FFDCA, or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FFDCA.
- Requires the AG to remove from the UTL any brand style that the AG determines has a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to remove from the UTL any brand style that is adulterated or misbranded as defined in the FFDCA, or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FFDCA. Requires the AG to promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the AG removes it from the UTL. Requires this notice to include the basis for the AG’s determination.
- Makes the removal of a brand style from the UTL effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to 7) above.
- Authorizes a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in 7) above within 30 days of the notice.
- Requires information submitted to the AG by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to 9) above to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product, as defined.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer that has made a submission under the provisions of this bill to submit updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to this bill to also do all of the following:
- Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement, and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this bill;
- Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- Identify the registered agent to the AG; and,
- Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this bill or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this bill.
- Authorizes the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state.
- Allows, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the AG declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the AG that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. Prohibits the filing of the petition from operating to stay the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Authorizes a manufacturer or importer to challenge a decision by the AG pursuant to 15) above, in addition to providing additional materials to the AG pursuant to 9) above.
- Requires the AG to publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
- Prohibits any person from affixing, or causing to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes, or paying any tax levied on a tobacco product unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
- Authorizes the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the AG that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits any distributor from selling any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Authorizes the AG, for each tobacco product sold in violation of this bill, to assess civil penalties against the distributor according to the following schedule:
- A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation;
- A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation;
- A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period;
- A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
- A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Requires, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorney’s fees, and costs. Requires awards under this bill to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Authorizes the AG to adopt those rules and regulations the AG deems necessary to implement the purposes of this bill, including regulations further delineating characterizing flavor determinations, requiring a fee for manufacturer and importer certifications, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Makes the regulations adopted to implement this bill emergency regulations, and required to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- States that this bill does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this bill, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Defines the following, for the purposes of this bill:
- “Brand style” to mean a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification;
- “Characterizing flavor” to mean a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product;
- “Tobacco product” to mean a tobacco product as defined in existing law, but excluding looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined; and,
- “Flavored tobacco product” to means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. “Flavored tobacco product” includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the UTL established and maintained by the AG.
- Requires cigarettes or tobacco products seized by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of this bill to be forfeited to the state.
- Authorizes an employee of CDTFA, upon presentation of appropriate identification, to enter any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of the ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products has been discovered.
- Makes the provisions of this bill severable. Provides that if any provision of this bill or its application is held invalid, that invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Finds and declares that in order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
EXISTING LAW:
- Pursuant to the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, requires the Board of Equalization to license all entities engaged in the sale of cigarettes and tobacco products in California. It also provides additional funding to Equalization to enforce the provisions of the act. (Business & Professions Code (BPC) Section 22970 et seq.)
- Requires the California Department of Health (DPH) to establish and develop a program to reduce the availability of “tobacco products,” as defined, to persons under 21 years of age through authorized enforcement activities, as specified, pursuant to the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act (STAKE Act). (BPC Section 22952.)
- Requires all persons engaging in the retail sale of tobacco products to check the identification of tobacco purchasers, to establish the age of the purchaser, if the purchaser reasonably appears to be under 21. (BPC Section 22956.)
- Permits an enforcing agency, as specified, to assess civil penalties against any person, firm, or corporation that sells, gives, or in any way furnishes to another person who is under 21 any tobacco product, instrument, or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products, as specified, ranging from $400 to $6,000 for a first, second, third, fourth, or fifth violation within a five-year period. (BPC Section 22958 (a).)
- Permits an enforcing agency to assess civil penalties against any person, firm, or corporation that sells, gives, or in any way furnishes to another person who is under 21, except for military personnel 18 years of age or older, any tobacco product, instrument, or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products ranging from $400 to $6,000 for a first, second, third, fourth, or fifth violation within a five-year period. (Id., at (b).)
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. (Health & Safety Code Section 104559.5 (b)(1).)
- Provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is a flavored tobacco product if a manufacturer or any of the manufacturer’s agents or employees, in the course of their agency or employment, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, text, color, images, or all, on the product’s labeling or packaging that are used to explicitly or implicitly communicate that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. (Id., at (b)(2).)
- Exempts these products from the prohibition in 3): premium cigars sold in cigar lounges where products are purchased and consumed only on the premises; and loose leaf tobacco or premium cigars. (Id., at (d), (e).)
- Defines “flavored tobacco product” as any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. (Id., at (a)(6).)
- Defines “characterizing flavor” to mean a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product. Includes, but are not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. Prohibits a tobacco product from being determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings or the provision of ingredient information and instead, it is the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, that constitutes a characterizing flavor. (Id., at (a)(1).)
FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.
COMMENTS: This bill, co-sponsored by Attorney General Rob Bonta; Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids; American Lung Association in California; American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network; and the American Heart Association, requires the Attorney General (AG), in order to enforce the state’s existing laws that prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco in the state, to establish and maintain on the AG’s website, a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL). According to the author:
Despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco, use flavored tobacco products. Protecting our youth from the market ploys and products that facilitates addictive behavior and harms their health has no business in California and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. This bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the Attorney General to hold those facilitating the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and enable law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
Background regarding the need to reduce consumption of tobacco products, specifically flavored tobacco products. Cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the United States, or nearly one in five deaths. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the following causes combined: Human immunodeficiency virus, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm-related incidents. More than 10 times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the U.S. Smoking causes about 90% (or nine out of 10) of all lung cancer deaths.
Confronted with disturbing trends of increased use of tobacco products among American teens (3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018; use continued to rise in 2019, with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors; leading to 5.3 million young Americans using e-cigarettes regularly by 2020), the Legislature passed, and Governor Newsom signed, SB 793 (Hill), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020. That law prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. It exempts the sale of Hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars from the prohibition. Fueled by kid friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban.
The tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. The next day, R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products, filed a federal lawsuit challenging the law. Federal district and appellate courts upheld the law; and in December of 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the tobacco industry’s appeal, clearing the way for the ban to take effect. Thus, under current law, a tobacco retailer, or agent or employee of a tobacco retailer, in violation of this section is guilty of an infraction and will be punished by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each violation.
However, without a definitive list of which tobacco products are flavored (or conversely a list of products that are not flavored), there is no way to know if a specific product is lawful in the state, making it very difficult to comply with and enforce the law. As the bill’s findings state, “Because many tobacco manufacturers do not disclose whether their products are flavored, it is difficult for government agencies, distributors, retailers, and consumers to identify whether tobacco products are flavored without actually using the products.”
The bill. In order to enforce the state’s existing laws banning the sale of flavored tobacco, the bill requires the AG to establish and maintain a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL). It requires all manufacturers and distributors of tobacco products to submit information about their products to the AG for the inclusion of their products on the UTL. And the bill provides penalties and specific enforcement authority to the AG. The underlying subject matter of the bill—the public health necessity to prevent the sale of flavored tobacco products in the state--is in the jurisdiction of the Assembly Health Committee, which recently heard and approved the bill (by a vote of 12 – 0). There are three main aspects of the bill that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee: (1) the limitations on the release of records in the possession of the AG which otherwise are open to public inspection and disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (CPRA); (2) due process for applicants to the UTL whose products are not listed on the UTL; and (3) the enforcement authority of the AG as well as civil penalties that the AG is authorized to recover and are therefore the focus of this analysis.
California Public Records Act Provisions. Access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state. (Government Code Section 7921.000.) In 2004, the right of public access was enshrined in the California Constitution with the passage of Proposition 59 (Nov. 3, 2004, statewide general election), placed on the ballot by a unanimous vote of both houses of the Legislature. SCA 1 (Burton, Ch. 1, Stats. 2004), which amended the California Constitution to specifically protect the right of the public to access and obtain government records: “The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business, and therefore . . . the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.” (Cal. Const., art. I, sec. 3 (b)(1).) In 2014, voters approved Proposition 42 (Jun. 3, 2014, statewide direct primary election), placed on the ballot by a unanimous vote of both houses of the Legislature, (SCA 3 (Leno, Ch. 123, Stats. 2013), to further increase public access to government records by requiring local agencies to comply with the CPRA and the Ralph M. Brown Act, and with any subsequent statutory enactment amending either act, as provided. (Cal. Const., art. I, sec. 3 (b)(7).)
Under the California Public Records Act (CPRA), public records are open to inspection at all times during the office hours of a public agency for inspection by the public, unless exempted. (Government Code Section 7922.525.) A public record is defined as any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any public agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. (Government Code Section 7920.530.) The CPRA allows a public agency 10 days or, in specified “unusual circumstances,” within 14 days of the 10-day period to respond to a request for the requested public record, and authorizes the agency to charge a fee for its “direct costs of duplication” of the record. (Government Code Sections 7922.530 (a), 7922.535.)
Despite the CPRA’s general rule making public records open to inspection and subject to disclosure, the CPRA provides exceptions when a document, or a portion thereof, is exempt from public disclosure. An exemption can be explicit in the CPRA itself, pursuant to another law that is incorporated by reference into the CPRA, or justified by the agency’s determination--based on the facts of the particular case—that the public interest served by not disclosing the record clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the record. (See Government Code Sections 7922.000, 7922.525, 7922.530.)
This bill provides that some information submitted to the Attorney General by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to the requirements of the bill “shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information” that “shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act[.]” However, it is important to note that this provision does not apply to all information that is submitted by a manufacturer or importer to the AG for the purposes of listing a tobacco product on the UTL. Rather, the limitation applies only to the “additional information” that the AG requests of manufacturers and importers that is specifically related to either “a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor” or “packaging or marketing of a brand style.” Given that this more limited scope of information is more likely to be proprietary, the limitation on release of that information seems reasonable. It is also consistent with CPRA limitations in similar laws.
For example:
- To enforce the state’s ban on the importation, production, manufacturing, and distribution of beer to which caffeine has been added (Business & Professions Code Section 25622 (a)), the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control may “require licensees to submit product formulas as it determines to be necessary to implement and enforce this section.” (Id.¸at (b).) The product formula information required to be provided by any licensee to the department pursuant to this section shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information that is not subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. (Ibid. [Emphasis added].)
- The CPRA has an exemption for “corporate proprietary information including trade secrets” within a contract between a local government and a private business and provides that, “Nothing in this division requires the disclosure of records that are [such records].” (Government Code Section 7927.605 (a) [Emphasis added].)
- When the State Department of Health Care Services negotiates with drug manufacturers to obtain drug discount agreements, “All information reported by a manufacturer to, negotiations with, and agreements executed with, the department or its third-party vendor pursuant to this section, shall be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information.” (Health & Safety Code Section 13506 (f).)
Due Process for applicants submitting information about their products to be listed on the UTL. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (applicable to the states via the 14th Amendment) prohibits a person from being deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. Due process protections under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments can be broken down into two categories: procedural (focused on ensuring fundamental fairness by addressing which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings); and substantive (focused on the substantive rights themselves). Both types of due process play a crucial role in safeguarding individual rights and preventing arbitrary government actions. In a regulatory scheme where the government determines whether a product is legal to sell, such as the one established by this bill, the government must provide the applicant with clear guidelines to ensure substantive due process, as well as basic fairness in the process for making its decision (notice, an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, and the right to appeal the government’s decision, etc.) in order to ensure procedural due process.
In this case, in order to have a tobacco product listed on the UTL, a manufacturer or importer would have to submit a certificate under penalty of perjury that does the following
(A) Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Categories shall include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs.
(B) Certifies that each brand style is not adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C., Sec. 301 et seq.).
(C) Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
(A) and (C) would seem to be straightforward matters for any manufacturer or importer to provide. Complying with (B), however, could be difficult or impossible, at least according to some individuals familiar with the FDA approval process. Information provided to the Committee shows that in order to be considered “unadulterated” as required by the bill, some tobacco products must be approved by the Secretary of HHS/FDA. But while the FDA (which has the authority to approve tobacco products on behalf of the Secretary of HHS) has a backlog of thousands of tobacco products that are pending review, those products are legal to sell while the review process is pending. Therefore, an applicant with a product that were pending approval by the FDA presumably could not certify that their product were “unadulterated” until that review process was complete, despite the product being legal to sell under federal law.
The California Fuels and Convenience Alliance (CFCA), which claims to represent “the majority of the 12,000 gas stations and convenience stores in the state,” makes this point in their letter of opposition to the bill (unless amended):
The bill as written requires manufacturers to submit under penalty of perjury that the product is not adulterated/misbranded (e.g., FDA authorized). However, there are many legitimate products that have been in the approval process for years but haven't been approved because of the backup in approvals at the FDA, further limiting products that can be sold.
While the topic of tobacco sales and regulation is outside the jurisdiction of the Committee, this issue could be relevant to the due process analysis of the bill. If it were true that the FDA has a significant backlog of thousands of tobacco products that are pending review, but the products are legal to sell under federal law, manufacturers and importers of those products could argue that it is impossible for them to comply with the bill’s requirements, and the bill therefore denies them due process of law.
The author may wish to consider whether it would be reasonable to require an applicant to certify (perhaps as an alternative to the information in (B)) that the product they have submitted for listing is legal to sell under all applicable federal laws and regulations, or perhaps that it has not been determined by the FDA to be adulterated. Given that the information must be certified under penalty of perjury, this may provide sufficient assurance to the AG, and to the public, of the product’s safety.
Assuming that the applicant can establish (A)-(C), above, the AG would have to determine whether the product has a characterizing flavor and would be required to consider, among other factors, information received from the applicant. The bill provides the AG with an evidentiary presumption. The AG can presume that a product has a characterizing flavor “if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor.” It seems appropriate to assume that a manufacturer’s marketing materials are truthful, given that otherwise it would constitute unlawful false advertising.
While the AG shall decline (and remove) from the UTL a product that the AG determines to have a characterizing flavor, the AG may decline (and remove) a product that is “adulterated as defined in Section 387b of or misbranded as defined in Section 387c of the FFDCA or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under 387e(j) or 387j of the FFDCA.” This seems somewhat confusing, given that a manufacturer or importer must certify under penalty of perjury—in order for the product to be listed on the UTL—pursuant to (B), above, that the product is not adulterated. However, this may be necessary to address a situation where an applicant falsely certifies that the product is not adulterated on their application (which also would constitute a felony under Penal Code Section 118).
For a manufacturer or importer whose application were approved (and the product were listed), the AG would have the power to later remove the listed product from the UTL. The AG would be required to provide the affected party with prompt notice of the AG’s intent to remove the product from the UTL and the reason(s) for doing so. The party would have the opportunity to provide the AG with additional materials, presumably objecting to the product’s removal and contesting the evidence that the AG has relied upon. Likewise, a manufacturer or importer whose initial application for listing of their product on the UTL were denied by the AG would also have the ability to provide such additional materials to the AG.
An applicant whose application for listing of a product on the UTL, as well as a party whose listed product were removed from listing on the UTL, may seek relief from the AG’s determination. They would have the ability to file a writ of mandate pursuant to Section 1085 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. This process appears to robustly protect the rights of applicants and parties, providing fairness in terms of the evidence being considered and the ability to challenge a determination by the AG relating to the UTL.
Enforcement Authority of the Attorney General: administrative fines and civil action. The bill prohibits any distributor from selling any tobacco product that does not appear on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. The AG is authorized to assess civil penalties (which arguable should be characterized as administrative fines, especially in light of the “civil penalties” that the AG is authorized to obtain in a civil action, as described below) against the distributor for each tobacco product sold in violation of this prohibition, according to the following schedule:
A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation;
A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation;
A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period;
A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
The AG is also authorized to bring a civil action, seeking injunctive relief (to stop an unlisted product from being sold in the state, for example) and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). The AG would be able to recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the AG that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true. Any funds that were recovered would be required to be deposited in the AG’s Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
Miscellaneous additional enforcement tools for the BOE relating to the Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003. The Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, requires the Board of Equalization (BOE) to license all entities engaged in the sale of cigarettes and tobacco products in California. It also provides additional funding to BOE to enforce the provisions of the act. (Business & Professions Code Section 22970 et seq.) Although this area of the law is outside the jurisdiction of this Committee, it is noteworthy that Sections 5-7 of the bill make several fairly significant changes to the Revenue and Taxation Code, providing the BOE with new enforcement powers relating to illegal tobacco.
First, the bill allows BOE employees, upon presentation of the appropriate identification and credentials, to enter into, and conduct an inspection of “any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of Section 104559.5 of the Health and Safety Code may be discovered.”
Second, the bill makes the following subject to forfeiture and destruction upon seizure by the BOE: “Cigarettes or tobacco products to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of Section 104559.1 of the Health and Safety Code.”
Third, the bill makes a person from whom illegal tobacco products are seized “liable for the cost of the destruction of property pursuant to this section, unless that person is a consumer that made a bona fide retail purchase of the product.” And finally, the bill clarifies that “the proceeds of the sale and any money forfeited to the state shall be deposited in the General Fund.”
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Co-sponsor Attorney General Rob Bonta writes as follows to explain the need for the bill:
Under current law, the flavored tobacco ban prohibits the retail sale of flavored tobacco products. Despite the ban, these products are still being sold in California and are ending up in the hands of young people. . . .Without strict enforcement in this market, noncompliant sellers provide easy access to flavored tobacco products. AB 3218 would hold noncompliant sellers accountable and reduce the availability of flavored tobacco products[.]
AB 3218 would provide the Attorney General’s Office, as well as other state and local enforcers, with the tools and support needed to keep flavored tobacco products out of the hands of young people; helping prevent young people from entering a lifetime of addiction and harm.
The other co-sponsors of the bill, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, and the American Lung Association write as follows in support of the bill:
While the proportion of California youth and young adult tobacco users who report that it is easy to access flavored tobacco products in retail stores has declined since implementation of the ban, over 70% still believe it is easy to access these products. It is clear that more work is needed to enforce this law in California. Over 90% of California high school e-cigarette users report using flavored e-cigarettes, so enforcing this rule is critical to ending this public health crisis. . . AB 3218 will stop the industry from using these tactics to continue to target young people and communities of color.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION (UNLESS AMENDED): The American Petroleum & Convenience Store Association writes that it “Opposes Assembly Bill 3218 unless amended,” but does not propose any amendments. Rather, it seems opposed to the concept of the bill, writing as follows:
California does not need another tobacco related proposal after voters upheld the statewide flavor ban in November of 2022, which has been in effect since December of 2022. Additionally, in 2023, California passed and enacted AB 935, which is an enforcement bill specifically designed to enforce the flavor ban. What the state needs to do is simply enforce their existing laws instead of adding new regulations.
The California Fuels and Convenience Alliance writes:
[T]his bill makes yet more changes to the definition of “characterizing flavor” creating more uncertainty as to which products are allowed to be sold. Specifically, the bill modifies the definition to capture products with a “numbing” sensation, which is vague, and at the whims of the next politically elected AG. As a result, CFCA urges that the bill be amended to focus solely on creating a Department of Justice directory on flavored tobacco products and clear guidance from the Department on how to comply with the existing ban already in place.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc. (co-sponsor)
American Heart Association (co-sponsor)
American Lung Association of California (co-sponsor)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (co-sponsor)
California Children's Hospital Assn
California Dental Association
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids
Cleanearth4kids.org
County of Santa Clara
First 5 Mendocino
Mendocino County Tobacco Prevention Coalition
San Diego City Attorney's Office
The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition
Opposition (unless amended)
American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association
California Fuels and Convenience Alliance
Analysis Prepared by: Alison Merrilees / JUD. / (916) 319-2334
Date of Hearing: April 9, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Mia Bonta, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 3218
Author:((Wood) – As Amended Ver:April 1, 2024
SUBJECT: Unflavored Tobacco List.
SUMMARY: Requires the Attorney General (AG) to establish and maintain on the AG’s website, a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor, to be known as the Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL). Specifically, this bill:
- Requires every manufacturer and importer of tobacco products to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution in or into California that lack a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to deem each submission to be a request that the brand style be included on the UTL. Requires any submission to be accompanied by a certification by the manufacturer or importer, under penalty of perjury, that does all of the following:
- Describes each brand style, brand, and tobacco product category. Requires categories to include, but not be limited to, cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, electronic cigarettes, electronic pipes, and electronic hookahs;
- Certifies that each brand style is not adulterated as defined, or misbranded as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 United States Code, Sec. 301 et seq.); and,
- Certifies that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires a manufacturer or importer, upon request of the AG, to provide additional information and factual substantiation regarding a brand style’s lack of characterizing flavor.
- Requires information submitted to the AG by a manufacturer or importer pursuant to this bill to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires, upon the request of the AG, a manufacturer or importer to provide additional information and documentation regarding packaging or marketing of a brand style.
- Requires the AG to presume a brand style to have a characterizing flavor if the manufacturer or importer, or any employee or agent of the manufacturer or importer, in the course of their employment by the agency, has made a statement or claim directed to consumers or to the public that the tobacco product has or produces a characterizing flavor, including, but not limited to, any text, color, or images on the product’s labeling or packaging, that explicitly or implicitly communicates that the tobacco product has a characterizing flavor. Allows this presumption to be rebutted by the manufacturer or importer.
- Requires the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that the AG reasonably determines has a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that is adulterated as defined or misbranded as defined in the FFDCA, or that is otherwise required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FFDCA.
- Requires the AG to remove from the UTL any brand style that the AG determines has a characterizing flavor. Authorizes the AG to remove from the UTL any brand style that is adulterated or misbranded as defined in the FFDCA, or that is required to obtain and has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order from the FFDCA. Requires the AG to promptly provide the manufacturer or importer that submitted a certification regarding a brand style with written notice when the AG removes it from the UTL. Requires this notice to include the basis for the AG’s determination.
- Makes the removal of a brand style from the UTL effective 30 days after the manufacturer or importer is given notice pursuant to 7) above.
- Authorizes a manufacturer or importer to provide additional materials that the manufacturer or importer deems relevant to the determination described in 7) above within 30 days of the notice.
- Requires information submitted to the AG by a manufacturer or importer pursuant 9) above to be considered confidential and corporate proprietary information. Prohibits this information from being subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires any brand style not on the UTL to be deemed a flavored tobacco product, as defined.
- Requires every manufacturer and importer that has made a submission under the provisions of this bill to submit updated information to the AG whenever it no longer manufactures or imports for sale or distribution in or into the state a brand style listed on the UTL or when the brand style it manufactures or imports no longer lacks a characterizing flavor. Requires this updated information to be provided to the AG by the manufacturer or importer prior to or on the date upon which the manufacture or importation of the brand style ceases, or prior to or on the date upon which the brand style no longer lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Requires every manufacturer or importer that submits a product pursuant to this bill to also do all of the following:
- Consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts for the purpose of enforcement, and for enforcement of regulations adopted pursuant to this bill;
- Appoint a registered agent for service of process in this state;
- Identify the registered agent to the AG; and,
- Waive any sovereign immunity defense that may apply in an action to enforce this bill or to enforce regulations adopted pursuant to this bill.
- Authorizes the AG to require a manufacturer or importer of tobacco products that are sold or distributed in or into California, whether directly or indirectly through a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer, to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import into the state.
- Allows, upon receiving notice from the AG that a brand style is either removed from the UTL or that the AG declines to include it on the list, the manufacturer or importer that provided the certification to the AG that the brand style lacks a characterizing flavor, to challenge the AG’s determination as erroneous, seek to rebut any presumption relied upon by the AG, and seek relief from the determination, by filing a writ of mandate in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, or as otherwise provided by law. Prohibits the filing of the petition from operating to stay the AG’s determination except upon a ruling of a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Authorizes a manufacturer or importer to challenge a decision by the AG pursuant to 15) above, in addition to providing additional materials to the AG pursuant to 9) above.
- Requires the AG to publish the UTL beginning on or before December 31, 2025.
- Prohibits any person from affixing, or causing to be affixed, any tax stamp or meter impression to a package of cigarettes, or paying any tax levied on a tobacco product unless the brand style of the cigarettes or tobacco products is included on the UTL.
- Authorizes the AG to seek injunctive relief and a civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and recover reasonable attorney’s fees, investigation costs, and expert fees against an entity or individual that certifies to the AG that a brand style lacks a characterizing flavor when the certifying entity or individual had no reasonable basis to believe the certification was true.
- Prohibits any distributor from selling any tobacco product not appearing on the UTL to any retailer, wholesaler, or other person for sale in California. Authorizes the AG, for each tobacco product sold in violation of this bill, to assess civil penalties against the distributor according to the following schedule:
- A civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for the first violation;
- A civil penalty of not more than three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) for the second violation;
- A civil penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the third violation within a five-year period;
- A civil penalty of not more than six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500) for the fourth violation within a five-year period; and,
- A civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for a fifth or subsequent violation within a five-year period.
- Requires, whenever the AG prevails in a civil action to enforce this section, the court to award to the AG all costs of investigating and prosecuting the action, including expert fees, reasonable attorney’s fees, and costs. Requires rewards under this bill to be paid to the Public Rights Law Enforcement Special Fund.
- Authorizes the AG to adopt those rules and regulations the AG deems necessary to implement the purposes of this bill, including regulations further delineating characterizing flavor determinations, requiring a fee for manufacturer and importer certifications, and adopting an administrative process for the imposition of civil penalties. Makes the regulations adopted to implement this bill emergency regulations, and required to be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare.
- States that this bill does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of a local ordinance that is more restrictive than this bill, that references or incorporates the UTL, or that imposes standards or definitions for a characterizing flavor that are more restrictive than those in this bill.
- Defines the following, for the purposes of this bill:
- “Brand style” to mean a style of tobacco product within a brand that is differentiated from other styles of that brand by weight, volume, size, Universal Product Code, Stock Keeping Unit, nicotine content, characterizing flavor, logo, symbol, motto, labeling, marketing, materials, packaging, or other indicia of product identification;
- “Characterizing flavor” to mean a taste or odor, distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of a tobacco product, other than the taste or odor of tobacco, including, but not limited to, tastes or odors relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice, or cooling or numbing sensation distinguishable by an ordinary consumer during the consumption of a tobacco product;
- “Tobacco product” to mean a tobacco product as defined in existing law, but excluding looseleaf tobacco, premium cigars, and shisha tobacco products, as those terms are defined; and,
- “Flavored tobacco product” to means any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. “Flavored tobacco product” includes any tobacco product, other than looseleaf tobacco, a premium cigar, or a shisha tobacco product, that is not listed on the UTL established and maintained by the AG.
- Requires cigarettes or tobacco products seized by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions, or for which tax is paid, that are offered for sale, possessed, kept, stored, or owned by any person with the intent to sell the cigarettes or tobacco products in violation of this bill to be forfeited to the state.
- Authorizes an employee of CDTFA, upon presentation of appropriate identification, to enter any building, facility, site, or place where evidence of a violation of the ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products has been discovered.
- Makes the provisions of this bill severable. Provides that if any provision of this bill or its application is held invalid, that invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Finds and declares that in order to facilitate manufacturer submissions of information related to brand styles of tobacco products for consideration by the AG, it is necessary to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of that information.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to protect the public's health and help shape positive health outcomes for individuals, families and communities. Establishes the California Tobacco Control Branch within DPH, which leads statewide and local health programs, services and activities that promote a tobacco free environment. CITE….
- Requires CDTFA, under the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act, to administer a statewide program to license cigarette and tobacco products manufacturers, importers, distributors, wholesalers, and retailers. Prohibits selling tobacco products without a valid license, and makes violations punishable as a misdemeanor. Retailers are required to obtain a separate license for each retail location that sells cigarettes and tobacco products and pay to an annual license fee. CITE>>>>>>
- Requires DPH to establish and develop a program to reduce the availability of “tobacco products,” as defined, to persons under 21 years of age through authorized enforcement activities, as specified, pursuant to the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement Act (STAKE Act). [Business and Professions Code (BCP) §22952]
- Requires all persons engaging in the retail sale of tobacco products to check the identification of tobacco purchasers, to establish the age of the purchaser, if the purchaser reasonably appears to be under 21. [BPC §22956]
- Permits an enforcing agency, as specified, to assess civil penalties against any person, firm, or corporation that sells, gives, or in any way furnishes to another person who is under 21 any tobacco product, instrument, or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products, as specified, ranging from $400 to $6,000 for a first, second, third, fourth, or fifth violation within a five-year period. [BPC §22958]
- Permits an enforcing agency to assess civil penalties against any person, firm, or corporation that sells, gives, or in any way furnishes to another person who is under 21, except for military personnel 18 years of age or older, any tobacco product, instrument, or paraphernalia that is designed for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products ranging from $400 to $6,000 for a first, second, third, fourth, or fifth violation within a five-year period. [BPC §22958]
- Prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a “flavored tobacco product,” as defined, or a “tobacco product flavor enhancer,” and authorizes an enforcing agency (DPH, the AG, or a local law enforcement agency) to assess civil penalties against any person or entity that violates this provision. [HSC §104559.5]
- Requires DPH, in addition to the civil penalties in 6) above, upon the assessment of a civil penalty for the third, fourth, or fifth violation, to notify CDTFA of the violation. Requires CDTFA to assess a civil penalty of $250 and suspend or revoke a retailer’s license. [Ibid.]
- Defines “flavored tobacco product” as any tobacco product that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. Defines “tobacco product flavor enhancer” as a product designed, manufactured, produced, marketed, or sold to produce a characterizing flavor when added to a tobacco product. [Ibid.]
- Defines “characterizing flavor” to mean a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product. Includes, but are not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, vanilla, chocolate, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. Prohibits a tobacco product from being determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the use of additives or flavorings or the provision of ingredient information and instead, it is the presence of a distinguishable taste or aroma, or both, that constitutes a characterizing flavor.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee.
COMMENTS:
- PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, despite the prohibition of flavored tobacco products in California, it remains readily available within our communities and on the shelves of too many retailers. The vast majority of children who use tobacco, use flavored tobacco products. The author notes that market ploys and products that facilitate addictive behavior and harm health, especially among youth, have no business in California and we must make implementation of these laws well defined and the enforcement sound. The author concludes that this bill will provide small scale retailers much needed clarity on which products are legal, enable the AG to hold those enabling the wide scale distribution of illicit flavored tobacco products in California accountable, and empower law enforcement agencies to seize those illegal products.
- BACKGROUND. Cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths each year in the United States (U.S.), or nearly one in five deaths. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the following causes combined: Human immunodeficiency virus, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, and firearm-related incidents. More than 10 times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the U.S. Smoking causes about 90% (or nine out of 10) of all lung cancer deaths. More women die from lung cancer each year than from breast cancer. Smoking causes about 80% (or eight out of 10) of all deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cigarette smoking increases the risk for death from all causes in men and women. In California, smoking-related health care costs $13.29 billion per year and smoking-related losses in productivity totals $10.35 billion per year.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on tobacco use. African American youth and young adults have significantly lower prevalence of cigarette smoking than Hispanics and whites, and although the prevalence of cigarette smoking among African American and white adults is the same, African Americans smoke fewer cigarettes per day. On average, African Americans initiate smoking at a later age compared to whites; however, they are more likely to die from smoking-related diseases than whites.
American Indian/Alaska Native youth and adults have the highest prevalence of cigarette smoking among all racial/ethnic groups in the U.S, however, it is important to note that some American Indians use tobacco for ceremonial, religious, or medicinal purposes. Regional variations in cigarette smoking exist among American Indians/Alaska Natives, with lower prevalence in the Southwest and higher prevalence in the Northern Plains and Alaska.
Hispanic/Latin adults generally have lower prevalence of cigarette smoking and other tobacco use than other racial/ethnic groups, with the exception of Asian Americans. However, prevalence varies among sub-groups within the Hispanic population, for example, 50% of Cuban men and more than 35% of Cuban women report smoking 20 or more cigarettes per day, and Mexican men and women are less likely than other Hispanic/Latinx groups to report that they smoke 20 or more cigarettes per day.
Although Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders are often combined together as one group in survey data due to smaller numbers of the individual groups surveyed, they are actually three distinct groups. Cigarette smoking among Asian American/Pacific Islander adults is lower than other racial ethnic groups, however, prevalence among Asian sub-groups varies and can be higher than that of the general population. Like many other minority groups, the LGBTQ+ community has been the target of tobacco industry marketing for several decades. As a result, smoking rates are disproportionately higher among LGBTQ+ individuals than the general population. About one in four LGBTQ+ adults smoke cigarettes compared with about one in six heterosexual/straight adults. More than twice as many LGBTQ+ students report having smoked a cigarette before the age of 13 compared to heterosexual students. - California’s flavored tobacco ban. In 2020 the Legislature passed, and Governor Newsom signed, SB 793 (Hill), Chapter 34, Statutes of 2020. The law prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of its agents or employees from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer. It exempts the sale of Hookah water pipes and flavored shisha tobacco products, pipe tobacco, and premium cigars from the prohibition. Fueled by kid friendly flavors like cotton candy and bubblegum, 3.6 million more middle and high school students started using e-cigarettes in 2018. The disturbing rates of teen e-cigarette use continued to rise in 2019 with the overwhelming majority of youth citing use of popular fruit and menthol or mint flavors and there are now 5.3 million young Americans who use e-cigarettes regularly. SB 793 also included menthol flavor, which was excluded from the original federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban, because, as the author of SB 793 noted during his bill presentation, unless action is taken, an estimated 1.6 million African Americans alive today, who are now under the age of 18, will become regular smokers; and about 500,000 of those will die prematurely from a tobacco-related disease.
Immediately after the passage of SB 793, the tobacco industry qualified a referendum for the ballot asking the voters to decide whether or not SB 793 should take effect, and enforcement of the ban was halted pending the November 8, 2022 election. The ballot measure, Proposition 31, was approved, thus upholding SB 793. The next day, R.J. Reynolds, the maker of Newport menthol cigarettes and top-selling vaping products filed a federal lawsuit challenging California’s ban on flavored tobacco. However, in December of 2022 the Supreme Court refused to block the law, clearing the way for the ban to take effect the next week. The law states that a tobacco retailer, or agent or employee of a tobacco retailer, in violation of this section is guilty of an infraction and will be punished by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each violation. This law does not specify where the enforcement authority of this statute resides, which implies local jurisdictions have authority to enforce this law. - Misbranded or adulterated tobacco products pursuant to the FFDCA. Under federal law, a tobacco product is deemed to be misbranded if: i) its labeling is false or misleading in any particular; ii) if in package form unless it bears a label containing the name and place of business of the tobacco product manufacturer, packer, or distributor, an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count; and, an accurate statement of the percentage of the tobacco used in the product that is domestically grown tobacco and the percentage that is foreign grown tobacco. A tobacco product shall be deemed to be adulterated if it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance, or is otherwise contaminated by any added poisonous or added deleterious substance that may render the product injurious to health.
- Grandfathered tobacco products. Generally, to be legally marketed in the U.S., the FFDCA requires “new tobacco products” to have a premarket authorization order in effect. A “new tobacco product” is any tobacco product that was not commercially marketed in the U.S. as of February 15, 2007, or any modified tobacco product that was commercially marketed after February 15, 2007. A marketing authorization is required for a new tobacco product unless: i) the manufacturer of the product submitted a report under the FFDCA Act and FDA issues an order finding the product substantially equivalent to a predicate tobacco product; or, ii) the manufacturer submitted a report and all modifications are covered by exemptions from the requirements of substantial equivalence granted by FDA. The FDA deems new tobacco products without required marketing authorization as adulterated and misbranded.
This bill would allow the AG to decline to include on the UTL any brand style that has not received a formal authorization, approval, or order under the FFDCA. Although the FDA has only authorized 23 tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes to date, there are thousands of flavored and arguably flavored tobacco products that remain available for retail sale in California despite lacking FDA authorization. Many of the unauthorized products are labeled “clear” or ambiguously branded with flavor concepts (i.e. “Blue” instead of “Blueberry”) in order to avoid flavor bans.
This bill requires a manufacturer or reporter to submit to the AG a list of all brand styles of tobacco products that they manufacture or import for sale or distribution (to be included on the UTL), that lack a characterizing flavor. This bill also requires the manufacturer to certify under penalty of perjury that each brand style lacks a characterizing flavor.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on tobacco use. African American youth and young adults have significantly lower prevalence of cigarette smoking than Hispanics and whites, and although the prevalence of cigarette smoking among African American and white adults is the same, African Americans smoke fewer cigarettes per day. On average, African Americans initiate smoking at a later age compared to whites; however, they are more likely to die from smoking-related diseases than whites.
d) Benefits of an UTL. According to an October 2019 DPH whitepaper, “Challenges in Enforcing Local Flavored Tobacco Restrictions,” a non-flavored list, which includes all tobacco products that may be sold in a particular jurisdiction, has several substantial benefits. First, developing, maintaining and using a non-flavored list is significantly easier than a banned product list. Whereas a banned products list may contain thousands of products, a non-flavored list might only contain several hundred unflavored products. As a result, a non-flavored list will be easier to maintain and use for both enforcement officers and retailers looking to comply with flavored tobacco restrictions. Additionally, a non-flavored list will make enforcement easier; unflavored tobacco products are less likely to be regional in nature, as regional variations are found in flavors. Further, California’s non-flavored list could be incorporated by reference in other states reducing the duplicative work required in building regional lists. Given the relatively static roster of unflavored tobacco products, a non-flavored list will require less training for enforcement personnel and be less vulnerable to enforcement difficulties at the retail level.
- SUPPORT. AG Rob Bonta is the sponsor of this bill and states that under current law, the flavored tobacco ban prohibits the retail sale of flavored tobacco products. Despite the ban, these products are still being sold in California and are ending up in the hands of young people. Tobacco companies make and market flavored tobacco products, which come with high nicotine content in a myriad of kid-friendly flavors. Young people are predominately the consumers of these products, and the usage among youth has increased rapidly in recent years, specifically among middle school students. A 2023 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that among middle school and high school students who currently use e-cigarettes, nearly nine in 10 use flavored e-cigarettes. The AG notes that without strict enforcement in this market, noncompliant sellers provide easy access to flavored tobacco products, and this bill would hold noncompliant sellers accountable and reduce the availability of flavored tobacco products in the following ways: i) establish a publicly available list of all tobacco products that are permissibly unflavored and allowed to be sold in California (UTL) so that industry participants and law enforcement entities can easily ascertain which products can and cannot be sold; ii) authorize the AG to seek civil penalties against distributors for selling products not appearing on the UTL to hold the distribution chain accountable at a higher level than the retail level; iii) render products not appearing on the UTL ineligible for tax stamps so that such products will be contraband and subject to seizure; iv) revise the definition of “characterizing flavor,” which delineates which tobacco products are prohibited from being sold to specifically include products that impart menthol-like cooling sensations, as well as other flavors that are “distinguishable by an ordinary consumer” so that the ban will encompass “edge” products that have been subject to debate and litigation; and, v) authorize the AG to omit from the UTL any tobacco products lacking FDA authorization. The AG concludes this bill would provide the AG’s Office, as well as other state and local enforcers, with the tools and support needed to keep flavored tobacco products out of the hands of young people; helping prevent young people from entering a lifetime of addiction and harm.
- PREVIOUS LEGISLATION.
- AB 935 (Connolly), Chapter 351, Statutes of 2023, makes provisions of current law prohibiting a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer's agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale, a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, punishable by civil penalties in the same manner as the STAKE Act.
- SB 793 (Hill) prohibits a tobacco retailer, or any of the tobacco retailer’s agents or employees, from selling, offering for sale, or possessing with the intent to sell or offer for sale a flavored tobacco product or a tobacco product flavor enhancer, as specified.
- AB 598 (Rivas) of 2021, would have required the AG to establish and maintain a list of tobacco product brand styles that lack a characterizing flavor. AB 598 was not heard in the Assembly Health Committee.
- DOUBLE REFERRAL. This bill has been double-referred; upon passage of this Committee, it will be referred to the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Attorney General Rob Bonta (sponsor)
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network INC.
American Heart Association
American Lung Association of California
California Children's Hospital Association
California Dental Association
California Medical Association
Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids
County Health Executives Association of California (CHEAC)
County of Santa Clara
San Diego City Attorney's Office
The Greater Sacramento Smoke and Tobacco Free Coalition
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Floor
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary
Senate Standing Committee on Health
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Assembly Standing Committee on Health
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):