SB 1107: School facilities: design-build: shade structures.
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2026-09-30
Current Status:
Passed
(2026-09-30: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1010, Statutes of 2026.)
Introduced
In Committee
Awaiting First Chamber Vote
Passed First Chamber
In Committee
Awaiting Second Chamber Vote
Passed Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
The bill lets school districts, through December 31, 2031, bundle multiple design‑build contracts (one firm doing both design and construction) for similar shade‑structure projects at different sites into a single solicitation when the combined projects exceed $1,000,000 and each project is no more than $10,000,000, while requiring each award to be a separate contract for a single project. It also limits the cost of making an accessible path of travel to a shade structure built into playground equipment, or a freestanding open‑sided shade structure, to 20% of the project’s adjusted construction cost on K–12, county, charter, and community college campuses.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Existing law authorizes a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to procure design-build contracts for public works projects in excess of $1,000,000, awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value, as provided. Existing law requires specified information relating to design-build bid proposals to be verified under penalty of perjury.
This bill would authorize a school district, on or before December 31, 2031, and with the approval of its governing board, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, if the total value of the projects exceeds $1,000,000 but does not exceed $10,000,000, awarding the bundled contracts to the lowest bid or the best value. The bill would require each contract awarded through the bundled solicitation to be a separate contract for a single project, as provided. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The Field Act requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of any school building or the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to any school building, if not exempted, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property.
The California Building Standards Code requires that specified buildings, structures, and facilities be accessible to, and useable by, persons with disabilities, including that when alterations or additions are made to existing buildings or facilities, an accessible path of travel to the specific area of alteration or addition is provided.
Existing law limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would additionally limit the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a shade structure integrated with playground equipment that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 17250.20 of the Education Code proposed by AB 1860 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1860 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law authorizes a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to procure design-build contracts for public works projects in excess of $1,000,000, awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value, as provided. Existing law requires specified information relating to design-build bid proposals to be verified under penalty of perjury.
This bill would authorize a school district, on or before December 31, 2031, and with the approval of its governing board, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, if the total value of the projects exceeds $1,000,000 but does not exceed $10,000,000, awarding the bundled contracts to the lowest bid or the best value. The bill would require each contract awarded through the bundled solicitation to be a separate contract for a single project, as provided. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The Field Act requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of any school building or the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to any school building, if not exempted, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property.
The California Building Standards Code requires that specified buildings, structures, and facilities be accessible to, and useable by, persons with disabilities, including that when alterations or additions are made to existing buildings or facilities, an accessible path of travel to the specific area of alteration or addition is provided.
Existing law limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would additionally limit the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a shade structure integrated with playground equipment that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 17250.20 of the Education Code proposed by AB 1860 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1860 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law authorizes a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to procure design-build contracts for public works projects in excess of $1,000,000, awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value, as provided. Existing law requires specified information relating to design-build bid proposals to be verified under penalty of perjury.
This bill would authorize a school district, on or before December 31, 2031, and with the approval of its governing board, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, if the total value of the projects exceeds $1,000,000 but does not exceed $10,000,000, awarding the bundled contracts to the lowest bid or the best value. The bill would require each contract awarded through the bundled solicitation to be a separate contract for a single project, as provided. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The Field Act requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of any school building or the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to any school building, if not exempted, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property.
The California Building Standards Code requires that specified buildings, structures, and facilities be accessible to, and useable by, persons with disabilities, including that when alterations or additions are made to existing buildings or facilities, an accessible path of travel to the specific area of alteration or addition is provided.
Existing law limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would additionally limit the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a shade structure integrated with playground equipment that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 17250.20 of the Education Code proposed by AB 1860 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1860 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law authorizes a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to procure design-build contracts for public works projects in excess of $1,000,000, awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value, as provided. Existing law requires specified information relating to design-build bid proposals to be verified under penalty of perjury.
This bill would authorize a school district, on or before December 31, 2031, and with the approval of its governing board, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, including, but not limited to, shade structure projects, bundled through a single solicitation, if the total value of the projects exceeds $1,000,000, $1,000,000 but does not exceed $10,000,000, awarding the bundled contracts to the lowest bid or the best value. The bill would require each contract awarded through the bundled solicitation to be a separate contract for a single project, as provided. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The Field Act requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of any school building or the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to any school building, if not exempted, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property.
The California Building Standards Code requires that specified buildings, structures, and facilities be accessible to, and useable by, persons with disabilities, including that when alterations or additions are made to existing buildings or facilities, an accessible path of travel to the specific area of alteration or addition is provided.
Existing law limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would additionally limit the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a shade structure integrated with playground equipment that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law authorizes a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to procure design-build contracts for public works projects in excess of $1,000,000, awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value, as provided. Existing law requires specified information relating to design-build bid proposals to be verified under penalty of perjury.
This bill would authorize a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable projects at various sites, including, but not limited to, shade structure projects, bundled through a single solicitation, if the total value of the projects exceeds $1,000,000, awarding the bundled contracts to the lowest bid or the best value. The bill would require each contract awarded through the bundled solicitation to be a separate contract for a single project, as provided. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The Field Act requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of any school building or the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to any school building, if not exempted, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property.
The California Building Standards Code requires that specified buildings, structures, and facilities be accessible to, and useable by, persons with disabilities, including that when alterations or additions are made to existing buildings or facilities, an accessible path of travel to the specific area of alteration or addition is provided.
Existing law limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would additionally limit the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a shade structure integrated with playground equipment that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
The Field Act requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of any school building or the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to any school building, if not exempted, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property.
The California Building Standards Code requires that specified buildings, structures, and facilities be accessible to, and useable by, persons with disabilities, including that when alterations or additions are made to existing buildings or facilities, an accessible path of travel to the specific area of alteration or addition is provided.
Existing law limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would increase the above-described limit on the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to a shade structure project to instead be 25% of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.This bill would additionally limit the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to the installation of a shade structure integrated with playground equipment that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
The Field Act requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of any school building or the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to any school building, if not exempted, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property.
The California Building Standards Code requires that specified buildings, structures, and facilities be accessible to, and useable by, persons with disabilities, including that when alterations or additions are made to existing buildings or facilities, an accessible path of travel to the specific area of alteration or addition is provided.
Existing law limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project that meets specified requirements and that is on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill would increase the above-described limit on the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to a shade structure project to instead be 25% of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)On or before December 31, 2031, a school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) but do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction. A contract entered into on or before December 31, 2031, may be completed after that date.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SEC. 1.5.Section 17250.20 of the Education Code is amended to read:17250.20.(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, or a county superintendent of schools, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)Notwithstanding any other law, the county superintendent of schools shall have exclusive authority to award design-build contracts pursuant to this chapter on behalf of a county office of education and county board of education.
(3)On or before December 31, 2031, a school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) but do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction. A contract entered into on or before December 31, 2031, may be completed after that date.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SEC. 2.Section 17671 of the Education Code is amended to read:17671.(a)Projects solely for (1) the installation of shade structures integrated with playground equipment or (2) freestanding, open-sided shade structures, that are included on the Division of the State Architect pre-checked designs list where the adjusted construction cost exceeds the valuation threshold for alterations or additions on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus shall have the cost of compliance for path of travel improvements required by Section 202.4 of Chapter 11B of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations limited to 20 percent of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(b)For purposes of this section, adjusted construction cost has the same meaning as in Section 202 of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
SEC. 3.Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 17250.20 of the Education Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1860. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2027, (2) each bill amends Section 17250.20 of the Education Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1860, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 4.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)On or before December 31, 2031, a school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) but do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction. A contract entered into on or before December 31, 2031, may be completed after that date.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SEC. 1.5.Section 17250.20 of the Education Code is amended to read:17250.20.(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, or a county superintendent of schools, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)Notwithstanding any other law, the county superintendent of schools shall have exclusive authority to award design-build contracts pursuant to this chapter on behalf of a county office of education and county board of education.
(3)On or before December 31, 2031, a school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) but do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction. A contract entered into on or before December 31, 2031, may be completed after that date.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SEC. 2.Section 17671 of the Education Code is amended to read:17671.(a)Projects solely for (1) the installation of shade structures integrated with playground equipment or (2) freestanding, open-sided shade structures, that are included on the Division of the State Architect pre-checked designs list where the adjusted construction cost exceeds the valuation threshold for alterations or additions on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus shall have the cost of compliance for path of travel improvements required by Section 202.4 of Chapter 11B of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations limited to 20 percent of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(b)For purposes of this section, adjusted construction cost has the same meaning as in Section 202 of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
SEC. 3.Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 17250.20 of the Education Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1860. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2027, (2) each bill amends Section 17250.20 of the Education Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1860, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 4.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)On or before December 31, 2031, a school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) but do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction. A contract entered into on or before December 31, 2031, may be completed after that date.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SEC. 1.5.Section 17250.20 of the Education Code is amended to read:17250.20.(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, or a county superintendent of schools, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)Notwithstanding any other law, the county superintendent of schools shall have exclusive authority to award design-build contracts pursuant to this chapter on behalf of a county office of education and county board of education.
(3)On or before December 31, 2031, a school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) but do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction. A contract entered into on or before December 31, 2031, may be completed after that date.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SEC. 2.Section 17671 of the Education Code is amended to read:17671.(a)Projects solely for (1) the installation of shade structures integrated with playground equipment or (2) freestanding, open-sided shade structures, that are included on the Division of the State Architect pre-checked designs list where the adjusted construction cost exceeds the valuation threshold for alterations or additions on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus shall have the cost of compliance for path of travel improvements required by Section 202.4 of Chapter 11B of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations limited to 20 percent of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(b)For purposes of this section, adjusted construction cost has the same meaning as in Section 202 of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
SEC. 3.Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 17250.20 of the Education Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1860. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2027, (2) each bill amends Section 17250.20 of the Education Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1860, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 3.SEC. 4.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)A On or before December 31, 2031, a school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at various sites, including, but not limited to, shade structure projects, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000), ($1,000,000) but do not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction. A contract entered into on or before December 31, 2031, may be completed after that date.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SEC. 2.Section 17671 of the Education Code is amended to read:17671.(a)Projects solely for (1) the installation of shade structures integrated with playground equipment or (2) freestanding, open-sided shade structures, that are included on the Division of the State Architect pre-checked designs list where the adjusted construction cost exceeds the valuation threshold for alterations or additions on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus shall have the cost of compliance for path of travel improvements required by Section 202.4 of Chapter 11B of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations limited to 20 percent of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(b)For purposes of this section, adjusted construction cost has the same meaning as in Section 202 of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
SEC. 3.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure design-build contracts for projects in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the contract to either the low bid or the best value.
(2)A school district, with approval of its governing board, may procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable projects at various sites, including, but not limited to, shade structure projects, bundled through a single solicitation, even if the values of any individual projects are less than one million dollars ($1,000,000), if the total value of the projects exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000), awarding the bundled contracts to either the low bid or the best value. Each contract awarded through a bundled solicitation shall be a separate contract for a single project with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction.
(b)The school district shall develop guidelines for a standard organizational conflict-of-interest policy, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services for the school district relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team. This conflict-of-interest policy shall apply to each school district entering into design-build contracts authorized under this chapter.
(c)This chapter shall apply to bid requests issued on or after July 1, 2016.
SECTION 1.SEC. 2.Section 17671 of the Education Code is amended to read:17671.(a)Projects solely for (1) the installation of shade structures integrated with playground equipment or (2) freestanding, open-sided shade structures, that are included on the Division of the State Architect pre-checked designs list where the adjusted construction cost exceeds the valuation threshold for alterations or additions on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus shall have the cost of compliance for path of travel improvements required by Section 202.4 of Chapter 11B of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations limited to 20 percent of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(b)For purposes of this section, adjusted construction cost has the same meaning as in Section 202 of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
SEC. 3.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)Projects solely for (1) the installation of shade structures integrated with playground equipment or (2) freestanding, open-sided shade structures structures, that are included on the Division of the State Architect pre-checked designs list where the adjusted construction cost exceeds the valuation threshold for alterations or additions on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus shall have the cost of compliance for path of travel improvements required by Section 202.4 of Chapter 11B of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations limited to 25 20 percent of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(b)For purposes of this section, adjusted construction cost has the same meaning as in Section 202 of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
It is the intent of the Legislature to enact subsequent legislation to increase the affordability of installing heat-reducing shade structures on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus.
SEC. 2.Section 17671 of the Education Code is amended to read:17671.(a)Projects solely for the installation of freestanding, open-sided shade structures included on the Division of the State Architect pre-checked designs list where the adjusted construction cost exceeds the valuation threshold for alterations or additions on a school district, county office of education, charter school, or community college campus shall have the cost of compliance for path of travel improvements required by Section 202.4 of Chapter 11B of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations limited to 20 25 percent of the adjusted construction cost of the shade structure project.
(b)For purposes of this section, adjusted construction cost has the same meaning as in Section 202 of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1010, Statutes of 2026. |
| Sep 30, 2026 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 6026.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Aug 26, 2026 | In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. |
| Aug 26, 2026 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6617.) Ordered to the Senate. |
| Aug 26, 2026 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 13, 2026 | From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 13). |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Assembly Rule 63 suspended. |
| Aug 5, 2026 | August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 1). |
| Jun 12, 2026 | June 17 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| May 11, 2026 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4034.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | Set for hearing April 20. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3791.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Mar 23, 2026 | Set for hearing April 8. |
| Mar 23, 2026 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | Unfinished Business SB1107 Stern Concurrence | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 26, 2026 | SB 1107 Stern Senate Third Reading By Schiavo | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 13, 2026 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 1, 2026 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Education |
Passed |
|
| Apr 23, 2026 | Consent Calendar 2nd SB1107 Stern | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 8, 2026 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Senate Standing Committee on Education |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| California School Boards Association | ** Support | |
| California State PTA | ** Support | |
| Center for Ecoliteracy | ** Support | |
| Elders Climate Action Northern CA Chapter | ** Support | |
| Elders Climate Action Southern CA Chapter | ** Support | |
| Los Angeles Unified School District | ** Support | |
| Natural Resources Defense Council | ** Support | |
| Sacramento Splash | ** Support | |
| Ten Strands | ** Support | |
| UndauntedK12 | ** Support |
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-4171 | SB 1107 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1107
Author: Stern (D)
Amended: 8/13/26
Vote: 21
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE: 7-0, 4/8/26
AYES: Pérez, Ochoa Bogh, Cabaldon, Choi, Cortese, Gonzalez, Reyes
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
SENATE FLOOR: 37-0, 4/23/26 (Consent)
AYES: Allen, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Arreguín, Ashby, Becker, Blakespear, Cabaldon, Caballero, Cervantes, Choi, Cortese, Dahle, Durazo, Gonzalez, Grayson, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limón, McGuire, McNerney, Menjivar, Niello, Padilla, Pérez, Richardson, Rubio, Seyarto, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Strickland, Umberg, Valladares, Weber Pierson, Wiener
NO VOTE RECORDED: Ochoa Bogh, Reyes, Wahab
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 8/26/26 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: School facilities: design-build: shade structures
SOURCE: Los Angeles Unified School District
DIGEST:
This bill authorizes school districts to bundle multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites into a single design-build solicitation, subject to specified requirements, and expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the California Building Standards Code for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to shade structures that are integrated into playground equipment.
Assembly Amendments
authorize school districts, until January 1, 2032, to bundle multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites into a single design-build solicitation when the combined value of the projects exceeds $1 million, even if individual projects are below the $1 million threshold for use of design-build, and make related chaptering amendments.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1) Defines “construction or alteration” for purposes of school facilities projects to include any construction, reconstruction, or alteration of, or addition to, any school building.
2) Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to pass upon and approve or reject all plans for the construction or, if the estimated cost exceeds $100,000, the alteration of any school building.
3) Generally requires the governing board of each school and community college district, before adopting construction or alteration plans, to submit the plans to DGS for approval and pay all associated fees.
4) Requires construction projects over $209,208 (cost threshold) to provide “an accessible path of travel” from the building entrance to the project location.
5) Specifies that an area that has been altered without providing an accessible path of travel to that area, and subsequent alterations of that area or a different area on the same path of travel are undertaken within three years of the original alteration, the total cost of alterations for the preceding three-year period shall be considered in determining whether the cost threshold has been met.
6) Limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
7) Authorizes a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to use the design-build procurement process for public works projects in excess of $1 million and to award a design-build contract to either the low bid or the best value, as specified.
This bill:
- Authorizes a school district, until January 1, 2032, with the approval of its governing board, to bundle multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites through a single design-build solicitation if the combined value of the projects exceeds $1 million, even if an individual project is valued at less than $1 million, provided that no individual project exceeds $10 million.
- Requires each project awarded through a bundled solicitation to be a separate contract with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction, and authorizes a contract entered into by December 31, 2031, to be completed after that date.
- Expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment that are included on DSA’s approved pre-check design list.
Comments
1) Need for the bill. According to the author, “Spending time outside plays a vital role in supporting children’s overall health and academic achievement. Regular access to outdoor environments can reduce stress and inattentiveness while strengthening cognitive growth and emotional well-being. However, students in urban areas face greater exposure to extreme temperatures, which can undermine the benefits of outdoor play by increasing their vulnerability to heat-related illnesses and diminishing their ability to focus and learn. Proper shading structures are essential to lower surrounding temperatures and protect children from dangerous heat.
“We are proud to continue the important work SB 515 had started by expanding its provisions to include overheard playground structure shading, further empowering our schools to quickly and cost-effectively provide schoolyard shading that keeps our children cool while they play.”
2) Plan review for construction projects. The DSA reviews plans for public school construction and certain other state-funded building projects to ensure that plans, specifications, and construction comply with California’s building codes (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). The majority of DSA’s plan review and construction oversight focuses on new construction and alteration projects for California school and community college districts. DSA’s plan review ensures the project’s compliance with code requirements related to:
a) Structural safety, ensuring that facilities meet the high standards set in the Field Act to withstand an earthquake.
b) Fire and life safety, addressing the safety of occupants in buildings, as related to fire resistive building materials, fire alarms, fire suppression equipment, safe occupant egress, and firefighting equipment access.
c) Access compliance, ensuring that public schools and state-funded construction projects meet accessibility requirements for people with disabilities.
d) Energy efficiency, including compliance with applicable California Green Building Standards Code requirements for sustainability.
3) The Field Act. All school facilities must be built in compliance with specified earthquake safety standards, commonly known as the “Field Act.” The Field Act was enacted following a severe earthquake in Long Beach in 1933. The Field Act requires a comprehensive design specification and construction inspection process for K-12 public school educational facilities. Community college facilities may be constructed in accordance with either the Field Act or the Building Code.
The Field Act requires the DSA (within DGS) to review the construction plans for school buildings and requires school districts to hire onsite construction inspectors to ensure compliance with the structural safety standards. School and community college construction contracts may only be awarded after DSA approval of the plans and specifications on which the contracts are based.
4) State Architect’s pre-check approval process. The DSA maintains a pre-check design list that includes over 25 “off the shelf” shade structures that schools and community colleges can install according to an expedited review and approval process. The pre-check approval process is intended to streamline DSA plan review by providing a procedure for approving the design of commonly used structures prior to the submittal of plans to DSA for construction projects. The pre-check approval process allows designers to incorporate designs for structures that have already been “pre-checked” by DSA into their plans for actual site-specific construction projects.
5) Bundling shade structure projects for design-build procurement. Existing law generally authorizes a school district to use design-build procurement for public works projects exceeding $1 million. The Assembly amendments authorize a school district undertaking multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites to bundle those projects through a single design-build solicitation if their combined value exceeds $1 million, even if individual projects are valued at less than $1 million. Each project must remain a separate contract with its own contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction.
This approach may be particularly useful for districts seeking to install similar shade structures across multiple campuses. Bundling comparable projects could allow districts to reduce administrative costs, achieve economies of scale, and make design-build available for shade projects that would otherwise fall below the statutory threshold. The authority sunsets at the end of 2031, providing an opportunity to assess whether this approach reduces the cost or time associated with installing shade structures before considering whether it should be continued or applied more broadly.
6) Expanding SB 515’s exemption for shade structures. SB 515 (Stern, Chapter 489, Statutes of 2023) created a narrow exception to accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for freestanding, open-sided shade structures included DSA’s pre-check design list. That measure was intended to reduce project costs and facilitate the installation of shade structures on school campuses in response to increasing concerns about extreme heat exposure for students during outdoor activity.
Under the Building Code, alterations to existing school facilities that exceed a specified valuation threshold (currently $209,208) must also include the provision of an accessible path of travel to the area being altered. Smaller projects that fall below the valuation threshold are generally exempt from these requirements. However, if additional projects or repairs at the same campus within a three-year period cause the cumulative cost of alterations to exceed the threshold, the path-of-travel improvements may be required retroactively for the earlier project. According to the author, this framework may result in relatively small projects, such as playground shade structures, triggering broader accessibility upgrades if other campus work has occurred during the prior three years.
This bill proposes to extend the exemption created by SB 515 to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment, allowing these projects to remain subject to the 20% path-of-travel cap regardless of whether the valuation threshold would otherwise be exceeded.
7) Balancing climate adaptation with accessibility improvements. School districts and advocates increasingly view playground shade structures as an important strategy for protecting students from extreme heat during outdoor activity. For example, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) reports that approximately 380 schools lack shade over play structures. With a $40 million budget dedicated to shade shelters, LAUSD estimates it can install structures at approximately 49 schools, prioritizing campuses using its Student Equity Need Index to target investments toward communities most vulnerable to extreme heat. According to LAUSD, reducing project costs associated with accessibility triggers allows available funding to reach a greater number of campuses.
At the same time, accessible path-of-travel requirements serve an important policy purpose: ensuring that accessibility improvements are incorporated into existing school facilities over time as campuses undergo alterations. For students, staff, and visitors who use wheelchairs or have other mobility challenges, these incremental upgrades can determine whether new or improved spaces on campus are reachable. Expanding exemptions from these requirements may allow new amenities to be installed without triggering broader accessibility improvements that might otherwise occur during facility upgrades. As the Committee considers expanding the exemption created by SB 515, it may wish to weigh the benefits of facilitating additional shade installations against the potential for fewer accessibility improvements to be made on aging school campuses.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
- Ongoing General Fund costs of $1.1 million for the Labor Commissioner's Office (under the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)) to accommodate the additional number of projects subject to enforcement of skilled and trained workforce requirements by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. According to DIR, under existing law, school districts are required to use a skilled and trained workforce to perform all work for design-build projects or contracts that fall within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades.
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Division of the State Architect (DSA) within the Department of General Services (DGS).
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/26/26)
Los Angeles Unified School District (source)
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/26/26)
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0 8/26/26
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Ahrens, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Ávila Farías, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Caloza, Carrillo, Castillo, Chen, Connolly, Davies, DeMaio, Dixon, Elhawary, Ellis, Flora, Fong, Gabriel, Garcia, Gipson, Jeff Gonzalez, Mark González, Hadwick, Haney, Harabedian, Hart, Hoover, Irwin, Jackson, Johnson, Kalra, Krell, Lackey, Lee, Lowenthal, Macedo, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Patel, Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Ransom, Celeste Rodriguez, Michelle Rodriguez, Rogers, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Schiavo, Schultz, Sharp-Collins, Solache, Soria, Stefani, Ta, Tangipa, Valencia, Wallis, Ward, Wicks, Wilson, Zbur, Rivas
Prepared by: Ian Johnson / ED. / (916) 651-4105
9/22/26 11:44:40
**** END ****
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-4171 | SB 1107 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1107
Author: Stern (D)
Amended: 8/13/26
Vote: 21
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE: 7-0, 4/8/26
AYES: Pérez, Ochoa Bogh, Cabaldon, Choi, Cortese, Gonzalez, Reyes
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
SENATE FLOOR: 37-0, 4/23/26 (Consent)
AYES: Allen, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Arreguín, Ashby, Becker, Blakespear, Cabaldon, Caballero, Cervantes, Choi, Cortese, Dahle, Durazo, Gonzalez, Grayson, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limón, McGuire, McNerney, Menjivar, Niello, Padilla, Pérez, Richardson, Rubio, Seyarto, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Strickland, Umberg, Valladares, Weber Pierson, Wiener
NO VOTE RECORDED: Ochoa Bogh, Reyes, Wahab
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: Passed, 8/26/26
SUBJECT: School facilities: shade structures
SOURCE: Los Angeles Unified School District
DIGEST:
This bill authorizes school districts to bundle multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites into a single design-build solicitation, subject to specified requirements, and expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the California Building Standards Code for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to shade structures that are integrated into playground equipment.
Assembly Amendments
authorize school districts, until January 1, 2032, to bundle multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites into a single design-build solicitation when the combined value of the projects exceeds $1 million, even if individual projects are below the $1 million threshold for use of design-build, and make related chaptering amendments.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1) Defines “construction or alteration” for purposes of school facilities projects to include any construction, reconstruction, or alteration of, or addition to, any school building.
2) Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to pass upon and approve or reject all plans for the construction or, if the estimated cost exceeds $100,000, the alteration of any school building.
3) Generally requires the governing board of each school and community college district, before adopting construction or alteration plans, to submit the plans to DGS for approval and pay all associated fees.
4) Requires construction projects over $209,208 (cost threshold) to provide “an accessible path of travel” from the building entrance to the project location.
5) Specifies that an area that has been altered without providing an accessible path of travel to that area, and subsequent alterations of that area or a different area on the same path of travel are undertaken within three years of the original alteration, the total cost of alterations for the preceding three-year period shall be considered in determining whether the cost threshold has been met.
6) Limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
7) Authorizes a school district, with the approval of its governing board, to use the design-build procurement process for public works projects in excess of $1 million and to award a design-build contract to either the low bid or the best value, as specified.
This bill:
- Authorizes a school district, until January 1, 2032, with the approval of its governing board, to bundle multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites through a single design-build solicitation if the combined value of the projects exceeds $1 million, even if an individual project is valued at less than $1 million, provided that no individual project exceeds $10 million.
- Requires each project awarded through a bundled solicitation to be a separate contract with an individual contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction, and authorizes a contract entered into by December 31, 2031, to be completed after that date.
- Expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment that are included on DSA’s approved pre-check design list.
Comments
1) Need for the bill. According to the author, “Spending time outside plays a vital role in supporting children’s overall health and academic achievement. Regular access to outdoor environments can reduce stress and inattentiveness while strengthening cognitive growth and emotional well-being. However, students in urban areas face greater exposure to extreme temperatures, which can undermine the benefits of outdoor play by increasing their vulnerability to heat-related illnesses and diminishing their ability to focus and learn. Proper shading structures are essential to lower surrounding temperatures and protect children from dangerous heat.
“We are proud to continue the important work SB 515 had started by expanding its provisions to include overheard playground structure shading, further empowering our schools to quickly and cost-effectively provide schoolyard shading that keeps our children cool while they play.”
2) Plan review for construction projects. The DSA reviews plans for public school construction and certain other state-funded building projects to ensure that plans, specifications, and construction comply with California’s building codes (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). The majority of DSA’s plan review and construction oversight focuses on new construction and alteration projects for California school and community college districts. DSA’s plan review ensures the project’s compliance with code requirements related to:
a) Structural safety, ensuring that facilities meet the high standards set in the Field Act to withstand an earthquake.
b) Fire and life safety, addressing the safety of occupants in buildings, as related to fire resistive building materials, fire alarms, fire suppression equipment, safe occupant egress, and firefighting equipment access.
c) Access compliance, ensuring that public schools and state-funded construction projects meet accessibility requirements for people with disabilities.
d) Energy efficiency, including compliance with applicable California Green Building Standards Code requirements for sustainability.
3) The Field Act. All school facilities must be built in compliance with specified earthquake safety standards, commonly known as the “Field Act.” The Field Act was enacted following a severe earthquake in Long Beach in 1933. The Field Act requires a comprehensive design specification and construction inspection process for K-12 public school educational facilities. Community college facilities may be constructed in accordance with either the Field Act or the Building Code.
The Field Act requires the DSA (within DGS) to review the construction plans for school buildings and requires school districts to hire onsite construction inspectors to ensure compliance with the structural safety standards. School and community college construction contracts may only be awarded after DSA approval of the plans and specifications on which the contracts are based.
4) State Architect’s pre-check approval process. The DSA maintains a pre-check design list that includes over 25 “off the shelf” shade structures that schools and community colleges can install according to an expedited review and approval process. The pre-check approval process is intended to streamline DSA plan review by providing a procedure for approving the design of commonly used structures prior to the submittal of plans to DSA for construction projects. The pre-check approval process allows designers to incorporate designs for structures that have already been “pre-checked” by DSA into their plans for actual site-specific construction projects.
5) Bundling shade structure projects for design-build procurement. Existing law generally authorizes a school district to use design-build procurement for public works projects exceeding $1 million. The Assembly amendments authorize a school district undertaking multiple comparable shade structure projects at different sites to bundle those projects through a single design-build solicitation if their combined value exceeds $1 million, even if individual projects are valued at less than $1 million. Each project must remain a separate contract with its own contract value, scope of work, location, schedule, design, and construction.
This approach may be particularly useful for districts seeking to install similar shade structures across multiple campuses. Bundling comparable projects could allow districts to reduce administrative costs, achieve economies of scale, and make design-build available for shade projects that would otherwise fall below the statutory threshold. The authority sunsets at the end of 2031, providing an opportunity to assess whether this approach reduces the cost or time associated with installing shade structures before considering whether it should be continued or applied more broadly.
6) Expanding SB 515’s exemption for shade structures. SB 515 (Stern, Chapter 489, Statutes of 2023) created a narrow exception to accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for freestanding, open-sided shade structures included DSA’s pre-check design list. That measure was intended to reduce project costs and facilitate the installation of shade structures on school campuses in response to increasing concerns about extreme heat exposure for students during outdoor activity.
Under the Building Code, alterations to existing school facilities that exceed a specified valuation threshold (currently $209,208) must also include the provision of an accessible path of travel to the area being altered. Smaller projects that fall below the valuation threshold are generally exempt from these requirements. However, if additional projects or repairs at the same campus within a three-year period cause the cumulative cost of alterations to exceed the threshold, the path-of-travel improvements may be required retroactively for the earlier project. According to the author, this framework may result in relatively small projects, such as playground shade structures, triggering broader accessibility upgrades if other campus work has occurred during the prior three years.
This bill proposes to extend the exemption created by SB 515 to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment, allowing these projects to remain subject to the 20% path-of-travel cap regardless of whether the valuation threshold would otherwise be exceeded.
7) Balancing climate adaptation with accessibility improvements. School districts and advocates increasingly view playground shade structures as an important strategy for protecting students from extreme heat during outdoor activity. For example, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) reports that approximately 380 schools lack shade over play structures. With a $40 million budget dedicated to shade shelters, LAUSD estimates it can install structures at approximately 49 schools, prioritizing campuses using its Student Equity Need Index to target investments toward communities most vulnerable to extreme heat. According to LAUSD, reducing project costs associated with accessibility triggers allows available funding to reach a greater number of campuses.
At the same time, accessible path-of-travel requirements serve an important policy purpose: ensuring that accessibility improvements are incorporated into existing school facilities over time as campuses undergo alterations. For students, staff, and visitors who use wheelchairs or have other mobility challenges, these incremental upgrades can determine whether new or improved spaces on campus are reachable. Expanding exemptions from these requirements may allow new amenities to be installed without triggering broader accessibility improvements that might otherwise occur during facility upgrades. As the Committee considers expanding the exemption created by SB 515, it may wish to weigh the benefits of facilitating additional shade installations against the potential for fewer accessibility improvements to be made on aging school campuses.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
- Ongoing General Fund costs of $1.1 million for the Labor Commissioner's Office (under the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)) to accommodate the additional number of projects subject to enforcement of skilled and trained workforce requirements by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. According to DIR, under existing law, school districts are required to use a skilled and trained workforce to perform all work for design-build projects or contracts that fall within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades.
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Division of the State Architect (DSA) within the Department of General Services (DGS).
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/26/26)
Los Angeles Unified School District (source)
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/26/26)
Prepared by: Ian Johnson / ED. / (916) 651-4105
8/26/26 16:22:12
**** END ****
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 1107
Author:(Stern)
As Amended Ver:August 13, 2026
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Authorizes a school district, with approval of its governing board, through December 31, 2031, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at multiple sites through a bundled single solicitation, if the cumulative project value exceeds $1 million, but is not more than $10 million, even if individual projects within the bundle total less than $1 million.
Major Provisions
- Authorizes that projects solely for the installation of shade structures integrated with playground equipment included on the Division of the State Architect (DSA) approved pre-checked design list, that do not exceed the valuation threshold for alterations, structural repairs, or additions to existing buildings, on a school district, county office of education (COE), charter school, or community college campus are not required to comply with specified sections of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) related to providing an accessible path-of-travel.
- Addresses double jointing with AB 1860 (McKinnor) of the 2025-26 Session.
COMMENTS
Bundling multiple design-build contracts. This bill authorizes a school district, with approval of its governing board, through December 31, 2031, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at multiple sites, through a bundled single solicitation, if the cumulative project value exceeds $1 million, but is not more than $10 million, even if individual projects within the bundle total less than $1 million.
This bill expands SB 515's exemption for shade structures. SB 515 (Stern), Chapter 489, Statutes of 2023, created a narrow exception to accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for freestanding, open-sided shade structures, included on the DSA's pre-check design list. That measure was intended to reduce project costs and facilitate the installation of shade structures on school campuses in response to increasing concerns about extreme heat exposure for students during outdoor activity.
Under the Building Code, alterations to existing school facilities that exceed a specified valuation threshold (currently $209,208) must also include the provision of an accessible path of travel to the area being altered. Smaller projects that fall below the valuation threshold are generally exempt from these requirements. However, if additional projects or repairs at the same campus within a three-year period cause the cumulative cost of alterations to exceed the threshold, the path-of-travel improvements may be required retroactively for the earlier project. According to the author, this framework may result in relatively small projects, such as playground shade structures, triggering broader accessibility upgrades if other campus work has occurred during the prior three years.
This bill proposes extending the exemption created by SB 515 to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment, allowing these projects to remain subject to the 20% path-of-travel cap regardless of whether the valuation threshold would otherwise be exceeded.
Plan review for construction projects. The DSA reviews plans for public school construction and certain other state-funded building projects to ensure that plans, specifications, and construction comply with the Building Code. The majority of DSA's plan review and construction oversight focuses on new construction and alteration projects for California school and community college districts. DSA's plan review ensures the project's compliance with code requirements related to:
- Structural safety, ensuring that facilities meet the high standards set in the Field Act to withstand an earthquake;
- Fire and life safety, addressing the safety of occupants in buildings, as related to fire resistant building materials, fire alarms, fire suppression equipment, safe occupant egress, and firefighting equipment access;
- Access compliance, ensuring that public schools and state-funded construction projects meet accessibility requirements for people with disabilities; and
- Energy efficiency, including compliance with applicable California Green Building Standards Code requirements for sustainability.
State Architect's pre-check approval process. The DSA maintains a pre-check design list that includes over 25 "off the shelf" shade structures that schools and community colleges can install according to an expedited review and approval process. The pre-check approval process is intended to streamline DSA plan review by providing a procedure for approving the design of commonly used structures prior to the submittal of plans to DSA for construction projects. The pre-check approval process allows designers to incorporate designs for structures that have already been "pre-checked" by DSA into their plans for actual site-specific construction projects. This bill would not exempt school district projects altogether from the DSA plan review process, but only from the review of the shade structures integrated into playground equipment. Reviews would likely continue to include fire and life safety, and access compliance at a minimum. DSA notes in the document, IR A-22 Construction Projects and Items Exempt from DSA Review, "When authorizing construction of exempt projects, the school district assumes responsibility to assure compliance with all code provisions."
According to the Author
"Spending time outside plays a vital role in supporting children's overall health and academic achievement. Regular access to outdoor environments can reduce stress and inattentiveness while strengthening cognitive growth and emotional well-being. However, students in urban areas face greater exposure to extreme temperatures, which can undermine the benefits of outdoor play by increasing their vulnerability to heat-related illnesses and diminishing their ability to focus and learn. Proper shading structures are essential to lower surrounding temperatures and protect children from dangerous heat. We are proud to continue the important work of SB 515 had started by expanding its provisions to include overhead playground structure shading, further empowering our schools to quickly and cost-effectively provide schoolyard shading that keeps our children cool while they play."
Arguments in Support
The Los Angeles Unified School District writes, "Schoolyard shading mitigates the urban heat island effect and reduce ambient temperatures by at last 15 degrees, safeguarding children's physical and mental health and promoting educational progress. As school districts invest in greening projects, particularly in areas where students have the least access to parks or green space, regulatory barriers have made the installation of shade structures cost prohibitive. This measure builds off the progress from our prior collaboration, Senate Bill 515, to reduce costs and streamline the process for approving and installing schoolyard shade structures. Whereas that effort was limited to free standing, open-sided shade structures that are detached from the playground structures themselves, this version would include shade structures attached to playground equipment. In all cases, the structures will be pre-approved by the Division of the State Architect. Moreover, no general funds would be used for these projects."
Arguments in Opposition
None on file
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
- Ongoing General Fund costs of $1.1 million for the Labor Commissioner's Office (under the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)) to accommodate the additional number of projects subject to enforcement of skilled and trained workforce requirements by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. According to DIR, under existing law, school districts are required to use a skilled and trained workforce to perform all work for design-build projects or contracts that fall within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades.
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Division of the State Architect (DSA) within the Department of General Services (DGS).
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 37-0-3
YES: Allen, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Arreguín, Ashby, Becker, Blakespear, Cabaldon, Caballero, Cervantes, Choi, Cortese, Dahle, Durazo, Gonzalez, Grayson, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limón, McGuire, McNerney, Menjivar, Niello, Padilla, Pérez, Richardson, Rubio, Seyarto, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Strickland, Umberg, Valladares, Weber Pierson, Wiener
ABS, ABST OR NV: Ochoa Bogh, Reyes, Wahab
ASM EDUCATION: 8-0-1
YES: Patel, Hoover, Alvarez, Bonta, Castillo, Lowenthal, Pellerin, Zbur
ABS, ABST OR NV: Garcia
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-0-4
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Calderon, Caloza, Fong, Mark González, Krell, Pacheco, Pellerin, Sharp-Collins, Solache
ABS, ABST OR NV: Hoover, Dixon, Ta, Tangipa
UPDATED
VERSION: August 13, 2026
CONSULTANT: Marguerite Ries / ED. / (916) 319-2087 FN: 0003538
Date of Hearing: August 5, 2026
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1107
Author:(Stern) – As Amended Ver:July 2, 2026
Policy Committee: | Education | Vote: | 8 - 0 |
|
| ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill authorizes a school district, with approval of its governing board, through December 31, 2031, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at multiple sites, through a bundled single solicitation, if the cumulative project value exceeds $1 million, but is not more than $10 million, even if individual projects within the bundle total less than $1 million. The bill also expands an existing exemption from California Building Standards Code regarding path of travel compliance improvements to integrated playground shade structures by adding such structures to the Division of the State Architect’s (DSA) pre-checked designs list.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Ongoing General Fund costs of $1.1 million for the Labor Commissioner’s Office (under the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)) to accommodate the additional number of projects subject to enforcement of skilled and trained workforce requirements by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. According to DIR, under existing law, school districts are required to use a skilled and trained workforce to perform all work for design-build projects or contracts that fall within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades.
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Division of the State Architect (DSA) within the Department of General Services (DGS).
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author:
Spending time outside plays a vital role in supporting children’s overall health and academic achievement. Regular access to outdoor environments can reduce stress and inattentiveness while strengthening cognitive growth and emotional well-being. However, students in urban areas face greater exposure to extreme temperatures, which can undermine the benefits of outdoor play by increasing their vulnerability to heat-related illnesses and diminishing their ability to focus and learn. Proper shading structures are essential to lower surrounding temperatures and protect children from dangerous heat. We are proud to continue the important work of SB 515 had started by expanding its provisions to include overhead playground structure shading, further empowering our schools to quickly and cost-effectively provide schoolyard shading that keeps our children cool while they play.
- Background. Design Build. Under current law, public schools and community colleges may choose from multiple construction delivery methods for projects on their campuses. Under the design-build method, authorized for projects over $1 million, the school district first engages a general contractor, and the general contractor engages an architect or engineer to design the project and then subcontracts with a third party who builds the project. This method can lead to greater price certainty than the alternatives and is oftentimes an overall quicker process.
This bill authorizes a school district, through December 31, 2031, to procure multiple design-build contracts for comparable shade structure projects at multiple sites through a bundled single solicitation with a cumulative project value of more than $1 million, but not more than $10 million, even if individual projects within the bundle have a value of less than $1 million, and award them to either the lowest bid or the best value.
Shade Structures. DSA, housed under DGS, reviews plans for public school construction and certain other state-funded building projects to ensure that plans, specifications, and construction comply with the California Building Standards Code, including accessibility requirements for people with disabilities. To streamline plan review and approval for certain projects, DSA maintains a pre-check design list that includes over 25 “off the shelf” shade structures LEAs and community colleges may install according to an expedited review and approval process.
The California Building Standards Code requires construction projects over a certain valuation threshold (currently $195,358) to also provide “an accessible path of travel” from the building entrance to the project location. Shade structures and other small projects that fall below the threshold amount are exempt from these path of travel requirements. The California Building Standards Code also requires that if an area has been altered without providing an accessible path of travel to that area, and subsequent alterations of that area or a different area on the same path of travel are undertaken within three years of the original alteration, therefore causing the total expenditure to exceed the valuation threshold, the original path of travel alterations must be made retroactively. SB 515 (Stern), Chapter 489, Statutes of 2023, exempted LEAs and community colleges from having to make these retroactive alterations.
This bill extends that exemption to integrated play structures attached to playground equipment.
Analysis Prepared by: Aaron Heredia / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-4171 | SB 1107 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1107
Author: Stern (D)
Amended: 3/23/26
Vote: 21
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE: 7-0, 4/8/26
AYES: Pérez, Ochoa Bogh, Cabaldon, Choi, Cortese, Gonzalez, Reyes
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
SUBJECT: School facilities: shade structures
SOURCE: Los Angeles Unified School District
DIGEST:
This bill expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the California Building Standards Code (Building Code) for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to shade structures that are integrated into playground equipment.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1) Defines “construction or alteration” for purposes of school facilities projects to include any construction, reconstruction, or alteration of, or addition to, any school building.
2) Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to pass upon and approve or reject all plans for the construction or, if the estimated cost exceeds $100,000, the alteration of any school building.
3) Generally requires the governing board of each school and community college district, before adopting construction or alteration plans, to submit the plans to DGS for approval and pay all associated fees.
4) Requires construction projects over $209,208 (cost threshold) to provide “an accessible path of travel” from the building entrance to the project location.
5) Specifies that an area that has been altered without providing an accessible path of travel to that area, and subsequent alterations of that area or a different area on the same path of travel are undertaken within three years of the original alteration, the total cost of alterations for the preceding three-year period shall be considered in determining whether the cost threshold has been met.
6) Limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
This bill expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment that are included on the Division of the State Architect’s (DSA’s) approved pre-check design list.
Comments
1) Need for the bill. According to the author, “Spending time outside plays a vital role in supporting children’s overall health and academic achievement. Regular access to outdoor environments can reduce stress and inattentiveness while strengthening cognitive growth and emotional well-being. However, students in urban areas face greater exposure to extreme temperatures, which can undermine the benefits of outdoor play by increasing their vulnerability to heat-related illnesses and diminishing their ability to focus and learn. Proper shading structures are essential to lower surrounding temperatures and protect children from dangerous heat.
“We are proud to continue the important work SB 515 had started by expanding its provisions to include overheard playground structure shading, further empowering our schools to quickly and cost-effectively provide schoolyard shading that keeps our children cool while they play.”
2) Plan review for construction projects. The DSA reviews plans for public school construction and certain other state-funded building projects to ensure that plans, specifications, and construction comply with California’s building codes (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). The majority of DSA’s plan review and construction oversight focuses on new construction and alteration projects for California school and community college districts. DSA’s plan review ensures the project’s compliance with code requirements related to:
a) Structural safety, ensuring that facilities meet the high standards set in the Field Act to withstand an earthquake.
b) Fire and life safety, addressing the safety of occupants in buildings, as related to fire resistive building materials, fire alarms, fire suppression equipment, safe occupant egress, and firefighting equipment access.
c) Access compliance, ensuring that public schools and state-funded construction projects meet accessibility requirements for people with disabilities.
d) Energy efficiency, including compliance with applicable California Green Building Standards Code requirements for sustainability.
3) The Field Act. All school facilities must be built in compliance with specified earthquake safety standards, commonly known as the “Field Act.” The Field Act was enacted following a severe earthquake in Long Beach in 1933. The Field Act requires a comprehensive design specification and construction inspection process for K-12 public school educational facilities. Community college facilities may be constructed in accordance with either the Field Act or the Building Code.
The Field Act requires the DSA (within DGS) to review the construction plans for school buildings and requires school districts to hire onsite construction inspectors to ensure compliance with the structural safety standards. School and community college construction contracts may only be awarded after DSA approval of the plans and specifications on which the contracts are based.
4) State Architect’s pre-check approval process. The DSA maintains a pre-check design list that includes over 25 “off the shelf” shade structures that schools and community colleges can install according to an expedited review and approval process. The pre-check approval process is intended to streamline DSA plan review by providing a procedure for approving the design of commonly used structures prior to the submittal of plans to DSA for construction projects. The pre-check approval process allows designers to incorporate designs for structures that have already been “pre-checked” by DSA into their plans for actual site-specific construction projects.
5) Expanding SB 515’s exemption for shade structures. SB 515 (Stern, Chapter 489, Statutes of 2023) created a narrow exception to accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for freestanding, open-sided shade structures included DSA’s pre-check design list. That measure was intended to reduce project costs and facilitate the installation of shade structures on school campuses in response to increasing concerns about extreme heat exposure for students during outdoor activity.
Under the Building Code, alterations to existing school facilities that exceed a specified valuation threshold (currently $209,208) must also include the provision of an accessible path of travel to the area being altered. Smaller projects that fall below the valuation threshold are generally exempt from these requirements. However, if additional projects or repairs at the same campus within a three-year period cause the cumulative cost of alterations to exceed the threshold, the path-of-travel improvements may be required retroactively for the earlier project. According to the author, this framework may result in relatively small projects, such as playground shade structures, triggering broader accessibility upgrades if other campus work has occurred during the prior three years.
This bill proposes to extend the exemption created by SB 515 to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment, allowing these projects to remain subject to the 20% path-of-travel cap regardless of whether the valuation threshold would otherwise be exceeded.
6) Balancing climate adaptation with accessibility improvements. School districts and advocates increasingly view playground shade structures as an important strategy for protecting students from extreme heat during outdoor activity. For example, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) reports that approximately 380 schools lack shade over play structures. With a $40 million budget dedicated to shade shelters, LAUSD estimates it can install structures at approximately 49 schools, prioritizing campuses using its Student Equity Need Index to target investments toward communities most vulnerable to extreme heat. According to LAUSD, reducing project costs associated with accessibility triggers allows available funding to reach a greater number of campuses.
At the same time, accessible path-of-travel requirements serve an important policy purpose: ensuring that accessibility improvements are incorporated into existing school facilities over time as campuses undergo alterations. For students, staff, and visitors who use wheelchairs or have other mobility challenges, these incremental upgrades can determine whether new or improved spaces on campus are reachable. Expanding exemptions from these requirements may allow new amenities to be installed without triggering broader accessibility improvements that might otherwise occur during facility upgrades. As the Committee considers expanding the exemption created by SB 515, it may wish to weigh the benefits of facilitating additional shade installations against the potential for fewer accessibility improvements to be made on aging school campuses.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
SUPPORT: (Verified 4/16/26)
Los Angeles Unified School District (source)
OPPOSITION: (Verified 4/16/26)
Prepared by: Ian Johnson / ED. / (916) 651-4105
4/21/26 16:19:39
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Senator Sasha Renée Pérez, Chair
2025 - 2026 Regular
Bill No: Hearing Date: April 8, 2026
Author: | |||
Version: |
| ||
Urgency: | Fiscal: | ||
Consultant: | |||
Subject: .
SUMMARY
This bill expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the California Building Standards Code (Building Code) for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to shade structures that are integrated into playground equipment.
BACKGROUND
Existing law:
- Defines “construction or alteration” for purposes of school facilities projects to include any construction, reconstruction, or alteration of, or addition to, any school building.
- Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to pass upon and approve or reject all plans for the construction or, if the estimated cost exceeds $100,000, the alteration of any school building.
- Generally requires the governing board of each school and community college district, before adopting construction or alteration plans, to submit the plans to DGS for approval and pay all associated fees.
- Requires construction projects over $209,208 (cost threshold) to provide “an accessible path of travel” from the building entrance to the project location.
- Specifies that an area that has been altered without providing an accessible path of travel to that area, and subsequent alterations of that area or a different area on the same path of travel are undertaken within three years of the original alteration, the total cost of alterations for the preceding three-year period shall be considered in determining whether the cost threshold has been met.
- Limits the cost of complying with the requirement to provide an accessible path of travel to a free-standing, open-sided shade structure project to 20% of the adjusted construction cost, as defined, of the shade structure project.
ANALYSIS
This bill expands an existing exemption from accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for certain freestanding shade structures to also apply to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment that are included on the Division of the State Architect’s (DSA’s) approved pre-check design list.
STAFF COMMENTS
- Need for the bill. According to the author, “Spending time outside plays a vital role in supporting children’s overall health and academic achievement. Regular access to outdoor environments can reduce stress and inattentiveness while strengthening cognitive growth and emotional well-being. However, students in urban areas face greater exposure to extreme temperatures, which can undermine the benefits of outdoor play by increasing their vulnerability to heat-related illnesses and diminishing their ability to focus and learn. Proper shading structures are essential to lower surrounding temperatures and protect children from dangerous heat.
“We are proud to continue the important work SB 515 had started by expanding its provisions to include overheard playground structure shading, further empowering our schools to quickly and cost-effectively provide schoolyard shading that keeps our children cool while they play.”
- Plan review for construction projects. The DSA reviews plans for public school construction and certain other state-funded building projects to ensure that plans, specifications, and construction comply with California’s building codes (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). The majority of DSA’s plan review and construction oversight focuses on new construction and alteration projects for California school and community college districts. DSA’s plan review ensures the project’s compliance with code requirements related to:
- Structural safety, ensuring that facilities meet the high standards set in the Field Act to withstand an earthquake.
- Fire and life safety, addressing the safety of occupants in buildings, as related to fire resistive building materials, fire alarms, fire suppression equipment, safe occupant egress, and firefighting equipment access.
- Access compliance, ensuring that public schools and state-funded construction projects meet accessibility requirements for people with disabilities.
- Energy efficiency, including compliance with applicable California Green Building Standards Code requirements for sustainability.
- The Field Act. All school facilities must be built in compliance with specified earthquake safety standards, commonly known as the “Field Act.” The Field Act was enacted following a severe earthquake in Long Beach in 1933. The Field Act requires a comprehensive design specification and construction inspection process for K-12 public school educational facilities. Community college facilities may be constructed in accordance with either the Field Act or the Building Code.
The Field Act requires the DSA (within DGS) to review the construction plans for school buildings and requires school districts to hire onsite construction inspectors to ensure compliance with the structural safety standards. School and community college construction contracts may only be awarded after DSA approval of the plans and specifications on which the contracts are based.
- State Architect’s pre-check approval process. The DSA maintains a pre-check design list that includes over 25 “off the shelf” shade structures that schools and community colleges can install according to an expedited review and approval process. The pre-check approval process is intended to streamline DSA plan review by providing a procedure for approving the design of commonly used structures prior to the submittal of plans to DSA for construction projects. The pre-check approval process allows designers to incorporate designs for structures that have already been “pre-checked” by DSA into their plans for actual site-specific construction projects.
- Expanding SB 515’s exemption for shade structures. SB 515 (Stern, Chapter 489, Statutes of 2023) created a narrow exception to accessible path-of-travel requirements under the Building Code for freestanding, open-sided shade structures included DSA’s pre-check design list. That measure was intended to reduce project costs and facilitate the installation of shade structures on school campuses in response to increasing concerns about extreme heat exposure for students during outdoor activity.
Under the Building Code, alterations to existing school facilities that exceed a specified valuation threshold (currently $209,208) must also include the provision of an accessible path of travel to the area being altered. Smaller projects that fall below the valuation threshold are generally exempt from these requirements. However, if additional projects or repairs at the same campus within a three-year period cause the cumulative cost of alterations to exceed the threshold, the path-of-travel improvements may be required retroactively for the earlier project. According to the author, this framework may result in relatively small projects, such as playground shade structures, triggering broader accessibility upgrades if other campus work has occurred during the prior three years.
This bill proposes to extend the exemption created by SB 515 to integrated shade structures attached to playground equipment, allowing these projects to remain subject to the 20% path-of-travel cap regardless of whether the valuation threshold would otherwise be exceeded.
- Balancing climate adaptation with accessibility improvements. School districts and advocates increasingly view playground shade structures as an important strategy for protecting students from extreme heat during outdoor activity. For example, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) reports that approximately 380 schools lack shade over play structures. With a $40 million budget dedicated to shade shelters, LAUSD estimates it can install structures at approximately 49 schools, prioritizing campuses using its Student Equity Need Index to target investments toward communities most vulnerable to extreme heat. According to LAUSD, reducing project costs associated with accessibility triggers allows available funding to reach a greater number of campuses.
At the same time, accessible path-of-travel requirements serve an important policy purpose: ensuring that accessibility improvements are incorporated into existing school facilities over time as campuses undergo alterations. For students, staff, and visitors who use wheelchairs or have other mobility challenges, these incremental upgrades can determine whether new or improved spaces on campus are reachable. Expanding exemptions from these requirements may allow new amenities to be installed without triggering broader accessibility improvements that might otherwise occur during facility upgrades. As the Committee considers expanding the exemption created by SB 515, it may wish to weigh the benefits of facilitating additional shade installations against the potential for fewer accessibility improvements to be made on aging school campuses.
SUPPORT
Los Angeles Unified School District (sponsor)
OPPOSITION
None received
-- END --
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Education
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):